1,181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Users’ experiences of intensive robotic-assisted gait training post-stroke – “a push forward or feeling pushed around?”

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3861-3868 | Received 18 Aug 2021, Accepted 23 Oct 2022, Published online: 07 Nov 2022

References

  • Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245–254.
  • Balaban B, Tok F. Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. PM R. 2014;6(7):635–642.
  • Bohannon RW, Andrews AW, Smith MB. Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Int J Rehabil Res. 1988;11:181–184.
  • Harris JE, Eng JJ. Goal priorities identified through client-centred measurement in individuals with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2004;56(3):171–176.
  • Krishnan S, Pappadis MR, Weller SC, et al. Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(12):1401–1409.
  • Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754.
  • Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Elsner B. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8(8):CD002840.
  • Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen E, Van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987.
  • Hornby TG, Reisman DS, Ward IG, et al. Clinical practice guideline to improve locomotor function following chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(1):49–100.
  • Nindorera F, Nduwimana I, Thonnard JL, et al. Effectiveness of walking training on balance, motor functions, activity, participation and quality of life in people with chronic stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of recent randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:3760–3771.
  • Pennycott A, Wyss D, Vallery H, et al. Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2012;9:65.
  • Díaz I, Gil JJ, Sánchez E. Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: literature review and challenges. J Rob. 2011;2011:1–11.
  • Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13(1):53.
  • Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, et al. Electromechanical‐assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5(5):CD006185.
  • Nedergård H, Arumugam A, Sandlund M, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted gait training on objective biomechanical measures of gait in persons post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021;18(1):64.
  • Tedla JS, Dixit S, Gular K, et al. Robotic-assisted gait training effect on function and gait speed in subacute and chronic stroke population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Neurol. 2019;81(3–4):103–111.
  • Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:48.
  • Geroin C, Mazzoleni S, Smania N, et al. Systematic review of outcome measures of walking training using electromechanical and robotic devices in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(10):987–996.
  • Mikolajczyk T, Ciobanu I, Badea DI, et al. Advanced technology for gait rehabilitation: an overview. Adv Mech Eng. 2018;10:1–19. 10:1687814018783627.
  • Kinnett-Hopkins D, Mummidisetty CK, Ehrlich-Jones L, et al. Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2020;17(1):124.
  • Phelan SK, Gibson BE, Wright FV. What is it like to walk with the help of a robot? Children’s perspectives on robotic gait training technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(24):2272–2281.
  • Palmcrantz S, Wall A, Vreede KS, et al. Impact of intensive gait training with and without electromechanical assistance in the chronic phase after stroke–a multi-arm randomized controlled trial with a 6 and 12 months follow up. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:660726.
  • Kawamoto H, Kamibayashi K, Nakata Y, et al. Pilot study of locomotion improvement using hybrid assistive limb in chronic stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:141.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
  • Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;56:29–34.
  • Lindgren BM, Lundman B, Graneheim UH. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;108:103632.
  • Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on. Trustworthiness. 2014;4(1):215824401452263.
  • Nicholson S, Sniehotta FF, van Wijck F, et al. A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(5):357–364.
  • Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698–1708.e10.
  • Damush TM, Plue L, Bakas T, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs. 2007;32(6):253–260, 262.
  • Rimmer J, Wang E, Smith D. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):315–322.
  • Lloyd A, Bannigan K, Sugavanam T, et al. Experiences of stroke survivors, their families and unpaid carers in goal setting within stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018;16(6):1418–1453.
  • Signal N, McPherson K, Lewis G, et al. What influences acceptability and engagement with a high intensity exercise programme for people with stroke? A qualitative descriptive study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39(4):507–517.
  • Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors’ experiences of rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18(3):163–171.
  • Schönberger M, Humle F, Teasdale TW. Subjective outcome of brain injury rehabilitation in relation to the therapeutic working alliance, client compliance and awareness. Brain Inj. 2006;20(12):1271–1282.
  • White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):593–600.
  • Gubrium JF, Rittman MR, Williams C, et al. Benchmarking as everyday functional assessment in stroke recovery. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58(4):S203–S11.
  • Vanmulken DA, Spooren AI, Bongers HM, et al. Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(7):547–551.
  • Ueba T, Hamada O, Ogata T, et al. Feasibility and safety of acute phase rehabilitation after stroke using the hybrid assistive limb robot suit. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(5):287–290.
  • Nilsson A, Vreede KS, Häglund V, et al. Gait training early after stroke with a new exoskeleton - the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2014;11:92.
  • Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, et al. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 4):866–872.
  • Kawamoto H, Hayashi T, Sakurai T, et al. Development of single leg version of HAL for hemiplegia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:5038–5043.
  • Thomassen GK, Jørgensen V, Normann B. “Back at the same level as everyone else”-user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5:103.
  • Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, et al. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2020;17(1):123.
  • Bragoni M, Broccoli M, Iosa M, et al. Influence of psychologic features on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with subacute stroke trained with robotic-aided walking therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(10 Suppl 2):e16–e25.
  • Young AJ, Ferris DP. State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(2):171–182.
  • Schmidt M, Blum M, Valkanover S, et al. Motor ability and self-esteem: the mediating role of physical self-concept and perceived social acceptance. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2015;17:15–23.
  • Resnick B, Orwig D, Yu-Yahiro J, et al. Testing the effectiveness of the exercise plus program in older women post-hip fracture. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(1):67–76.