Return to work among workers recovering from severe COVID-19 in Slovenia: a focus group study

References

• Asaba E, Sy M, Pineda RC, et al. Return to work after COVID-19: an international perspective. World Fed Occup Ther Bull. 2022 March 9;1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bratun U, Asaba E. Experiences and motives of retirement-aged workers during the first wave of COVID-19 in Slovenia: “this was the first time in 40 years that I really saw spring”. J Aging Stud. 2021;58:100954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürlimann O, Decavel P, Annoni J-M, et al. Return to work after hospitalisation for COVID-19 infection. Eur J Intern Med. 2022;97:110–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239–1242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin DA, Gulick RM, Martinez FJ. Severe covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(25):2451–2460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Rehabilitation after COVID-19: an evidence-based approach. Clin Med (Lond). 2020;20(4):359–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamdar BB, Suri R, Suchyta MR, et al. Return to work after critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2020;75(1):17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramirez DC, Normand K, Zhaoyun Y, et al. Long-term impact of COVID-19: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Biomedicines. 2021;9(8):900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. E Clin Med. 2021;38:101019.
   Google Scholar
• Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, et al. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE, Besen E, Choi Y. The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker’s expectations for return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1808–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmark L, Westgren N, Asaba E. Returning to work after spinal cord injury: exploring young adults’ early expectations and experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25–26):2553–2558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, et al. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):215–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampere M, Gimeno D, Serra C, et al. Return to work expectations of workers on long-term non-work-related sick leave. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Eriksson G, et al. Return to work in the context of everyday life 7–11 years after spinal cord injury – a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(24):2875–2883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Hultling C, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of ReWork-SCI: a person-centred intervention for return-to-work after spinal cord injury. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e036000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan I, Briggs T, Chew-Graham C. Supporting patients with long COVID return to work. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(712):508–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergström G, et al. Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Public Health. Dnevno spremljanje okužb s SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). [Daily report on SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infections]. 2022. Available from: https://www.nijz.si/sl/dnevno-spremljanje-okuzb-s-sars-cov-2-Covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Jeren B, Kofol-Bric T. Evidenca začasne/trajne odsotnosti z dela zaradi bolezni, poškodb, nege, spremstva in drugih vzrokov. [The register of short and long-term absence from work due to illness, injury, caretaking and other reasons]. Ljubljana:National Institute for Public Health; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jeren B. Evidenca začasne/trajne odsotnosti z dela zaradi bolezni, poškodb, nege, spremstva in drugih vzrokov. [The register of short and long-term absence from work due to illness, injury, caretaking and other reasons]. Ljubljana: National Institute for Public Health; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Keber D. Utrjevanje vrednot in vzpodbujanje sprememb: Zdravstvena reforma 2003 [Strengthening values and encouraging changes: Health Reform 2003]. Zdrav Vestn. 2003;72(2):57–58.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness and Disability Insurance in Slovenia: new evidence, key challenges and OECD conclusions; Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. Act on intervention measures to assist in mitigating the consequences of the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic (ZIUPOPDVE). 2020. Available from: http://pisrs.si
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Slovenia. Quarantene at home. Portal GOVSI [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 November 29]. Available from: https://www.gov.si/teme/koronavirus-sars-cov-2/karantena-na-domu/
   Google Scholar
• Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(5):690–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jankola A, et al. Work ability index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health;1998.
   Google Scholar
• Asaba E, Farias L, Åkesson E. Return to work after COVID-19: A Stockholm study. In manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaba E, Aldrich RM, Gabrielsson H, et al. Challenging conceptualisations of work: revisiting contemporary experiences of return to work and unemployment. J Occup Sci. 2021;28(1):81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratun U, Zurc J. The motives of people who delay retirement: an occupational perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;29(6):484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wind A, van der Pas S, Blatter BM, et al. A life course perspective on working beyond retirement-results from a longitudinal study in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Farrow A, Blank A. “Otherwise it would be nothing but cruises”: exploring the subjective benefits of working beyond 65. Int J Ageing Later Life. 2012;7(1):79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. Extending working life: what do workers want? 2017 [cited 2022 April 10]. Available from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2017/eu-member-states/extending-working-life-what-do-workers-want.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund Å, Kristofferzon M-L, Boman E, et al. Are return to work beliefs, psychological well-being and perceived health related to return-to-work intentions among women on long-term sick leave for common mental disorders? A cross-sectional study based on the theory of planned behaviour. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzwedel A, Reibis R, Hadzic M, et al. Patients’ expectations of returning to work, co-morbid disorders and work capacity at discharge from cardiac rehabilitation. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel N, Steinberg C, Patel R, et al. Description and functional outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(12):1124–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavson AM, Rud B, Sullivan EK, et al. Role and impact of interdisciplinary rehabilitation in an acute COVID‐19 recovery unit. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(4):878–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadel L, Marcinow M, Sandercock J, et al. A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: more consultation, less partnership. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0257880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Côté P. The work disability paradigm and its public health implications. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability. New York (NY): springer New York; 2013. p. 59–67. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6214-9_5
   Google Scholar
• O'Hagan FT, Coutu MF, Thomas SG, et al. Work reintegration and cardiovascular disease: medical and rehabilitation influences. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutu M-F, Gaudreault N, Major M-E, et al. Return to work following total knee arthroplasty: a multiple case study of stakeholder perspectives. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(6):920–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Hellman T, Engblom M, et al. Coordination of return-to-work for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: facilitators and barriers. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44:3113–3121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Guidetti S, Eriksson G, et al. Return-to-work: exploring professionals’ experiences of support for persons with spinal cord injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(7):571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öst Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Asaba E, et al. Being a co-worker or a manager of a colleague returning to work after stroke: a challenge facilitated by cooperation and flexibility. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):213–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent M, Pahor M. Patient involvement in Europe – a comparative framework. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(5):546–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AE, Choi Y. Work-related factors considered by sickness-absent employees when estimating timeframes for returning to work. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0163674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kools L, Koning P. Graded return-to-work as a stepping stone to full work resumption. J Health Econ. 2019;65:189–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand M-J, Vézina N, Richard M-C. Concept of margin of manoeuvre in return to work. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of return to work. Vol. 1. Handbooks in health, work, and disability. Boston (MA): Springer US; 2016. p. 53–65. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7627-7_3
   Google Scholar