266
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The patient-practitioner interaction in post bariatric surgery consultations: an interpersonal process recall study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 4440-4449 | Received 10 Jun 2022, Accepted 23 Nov 2022, Published online: 09 Dec 2022

References

  • Toombs K. The meaning of illness. Dordrecht, Netherlands: kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993.
  • Carel H. Phenomenology of illness. Oxford, UK: oxford University Press; 2016.
  • Toombs K. The meaning of illness: a phenomenological approach to the patient-physician relationship. J Med Philos. 1987;12(3):219–240.
  • Toombs K. The role of empathy in clinical practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2001;8(5-7):5–7.
  • Carel H. Illness: the cry of the flesh. Durham, England: acumen Publishing; 2008.
  • Dieppe P, Fussell I, Warber SL. The power of caring in clinical encounters. BMJ. 2020;371:m4100.
  • Carel H, Macnaughton J. “How do you feel?”: oscillating perspectives in the clinic. The Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2334–2335.
  • Franklin M, Lewis S, Willis K, et al. Controlled, constrained, or flexible? How Self-Management goals are shaped By patient–provider interactions. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(4):557–567.
  • Portacolone E, Covinsky KE, Johnson JK, et al. Expectations and concerns of older adults With cognitive impairment About their relationship With medical providers: a call for therapeutic alliances. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(10):1584–1595.
  • Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76(4):390–393.
  • Matusitz J, Spear J. Effective doctor-patient communication: an updated examination. Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(3):252–266.
  • Jumbe S, Meyrick J. Contrasting views of the post-bariatric surgery experience between patients and their practitioners: a qualitative study [journal article]. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2447–2456. March 12.
  • Kirk SFL, Price SL, Penney TL, et al. Shame, and lack of support: a multilevel study on obesity management. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(6):790–800.
  • Raves DM, Brewis A, Trainer S, et al. Bariatric surgery patients’ perceptions of Weight-Related stigma in healthcare settings impair post-surgery dietary adherence. Front Psychol. 7:1497.
  • Ward N, Ogden J. ‘Damned one way or another’: Bariatric surgeons’ reflections on patients’ suboptimal outcomes from weight loss surgery. Psychol Health. 2019;34(4):385–402.
  • Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 1945/2012.
  • Benjamin J. Beyond doer And done To: an intersubjective view Of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 2004;73(1):5–46.
  • Zahavi D. Self & other. Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
  • Dahlberg H, Dahlberg K. Open and reflective lifeworld research: a third way. Qualitative Inquiry. 2019;26(5):1077800419836696.
  • Dahlberg K, Nyström M, Dahlberg H. Reflective lifeworld research. 2nd ed. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur; 2008.
  • Kagan N, Kagan H. Interpersonal process recall. In: Dowrick PW, editor. Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. p. 221–230.
  • Larsen D, Flesaker K, Stege R. Qualitative interviewing using interpersonal process recall: investigating internal experiences during Professional-Client conversations. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;7(1):18–37.
  • Macaskie J, Lees J, Freshwater D. Talking about talking: interpersonal process recall as an intersubjective approach to research. Psychodynamic Practice. 2015;21(3):226–240.
  • Husserl E. The crisis of european sciences and trancendental phenomenology. In: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press; 1954/1970.
  • Gibson BE. Videorecording. In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2008.
  • Abma T, Banks S, Cook T, et al. Participatory research for health and social Well-Being. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019.
  • Moltu C, Stefansen J, Svisdahl M, et al. Negotiating the coresearcher mandate - service users’ experiences of doing collaborative research on mental health. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(19):1608–1616.
  • Morse J. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res. 1995;5(2):147–149.
  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2009.
  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
  • Ummel D, Achille M. How not to let secrets Out when conducting qualitative research With dyads. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(6):807–815.
  • Eisikovits Z, Koren C. Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(12):1642–1655.
  • Collaço N, Wagland R, Alexis O, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative dyadic data in health research. Qual Health Res. 2021;31(8):1555–1564.
  • Dolezal L. The body and shame. London: lexington Books; 2015.
  • Owen-Smith A, Coast J, Donovan JL. Self-responsibility, rationing and treatment decision making - managing moral narratives alongside fiscal reality in the obesity surgery clinic. Health Expect. 2018;21(3):606–614.
  • Kaplan LM, Golden A, Jinnett K, et al. Perceptions of barriers to effective obesity care: results from the national ACTION study. Obesity. 2018;26(1):61–69.
  • Zulman DM, Haverfield MC, Shaw JG, et al. Practices to foster physician presence and connection With patients in the clinical encounter. JAMA. 2020;323(1):70–81.
  • Ogden J, Ratcliffe D, Snowdon-Carr V. British obesity metabolic surgery society endorsed guidelines for psychological support pre- and post-bariatric surgery. Clin Obes. 2019;9(6):e12339.
  • Boehmer KR, Gionfriddo MR, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, et al. Patient capacity and constraints in the experience of chronic disease: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):127.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.