Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 45, 2023 - Issue 26
Submit an article Journal homepage
250
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test using decision rules for skipping items in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a retrospective study

Satoru Amanoa Occupational Therapy Course, Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan;b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Atsushi Umejic Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital, Nishinomiya, JapanView further author information
,
Kayoko Takahashia Occupational Therapy Course, Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, JapanView further author information
,
Takashi Takebayashid Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, JapanView further author information
,
Yuki Uchiyamab Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, JapanView further author information
&
Kazuhisa Domenb Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, JapanView further author information
Pages 4471-4477 | Received 28 Feb 2022, Accepted 25 Nov 2022, Published online: 08 Dec 2022

References

  • Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792.
  • Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–360.
  • Pike S, Lannin NA, Wales K, et al. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Action Research Arm Test in neurorehabilitation. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65(5):449–471.
  • Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483–492.
  • van der Lee JH, Roorda LD, Beckerman H, et al. Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(6):646–653.
  • Daghsen L, Fleury L, Bouvier J, et al. Evaluation of a shortened version of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) for upper extremity function after stroke: the Mini-ARAT. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(9):1257–1266.
  • Persson HC, Alt Murphy M, Danielsson A, et al. A cohort study investigating a simple, early assessment to predict upper extremity function after stroke – a part of the SALGOT study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:92.
  • Zonjee VJ, Selles RW, Roorda LD, et al. Reducing the number of test items of the action research arm test poststroke: a decision tree analysis(✰). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(8):1582–1591.
  • Amano S, Umeji A, Uchita A, et al. Clinimetric properties of the action research arm test for the assessment of arm activity in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(2):127–136.
  • Amano S, Umeji A, Uchita A, et al. Clinimetric properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment with adapted guidelines for the assessment of arm function in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(7):1–6.
  • Platz T. Arm rehabilitation measurement: manual for performance and scoring of the Fugl-Meyer test (arm section). Action research arm test, and the box-and-Block test. Berlin: Deutscher Wissenschafts-Verlag; 2005.
  • Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404–411.
  • Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2493–2496.
  • Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2018. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002; 21(9):1331–1335.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  • van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2369–2375.
  • Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
  • Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med. 1994; 13(23–24):2437–2453.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.