Strategy-training post-stroke via tele-rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial

References

• Palstam A, Sjödin A, Sunnerhagen KS. Participation and autonomy five years after stroke: a longitudinal observational study. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhamoon MS, Longstreth WT, Bartz TM, et al. Disability trajectories before and after vascular events: the cardiovascular health study. Stroke. 2015;46(suppl_1):A142.
   Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo S, Feigin VL, Parag V, et al. Auckland stroke outcomes study: part 2: cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1608–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, et al. Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(10):1091–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singam A, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Participation in complex and social everyday activities six years after stroke: predictors for return to pre-stroke level. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):439–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strilciuc S, Grad DA, Radu C, et al. The economic burden of stroke: a systematic review of cost of illness studies. J Med Life. 2021;14(5):606–619.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, et al. Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(8):2361–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezekiel L, Collett J, Mayo NE, et al. Factors associated with participation in life situations for adults with stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(5):945–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwyk RJ, Mihaljcic T, Wong DK, et al. Poststroke cognitive impairment negatively impacts activity and participation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(2):748–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TB, Marshall RS, Lazar RM. Stroke, cognitive deficits, and rehabilitation: still an incomplete picture. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(1):38–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K, et al. The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018;90(16):e1364-71–e1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipskaya-Velikovsky L, Zeilig G, Weingarden H, et al. Executive functioning and daily living of individuals with chronic stroke: measurement and implications. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(2):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso HM, Hietanen M, Melkas S, et al. Executive function subdomains are associated with post‐stroke functional outcome and permanent institutionalization. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(3):546–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanton R, Gustafsson L, Froude E, et al. Cognitive strategy training for adults with neurological conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effect on occupational performance. Br J Occup Ther. 2020;83(12):723–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MP, et al. Inter-task transfer of meaningful, functional skills following a cognitive-based treatment: results of three multiple baseline design experiments in adults with chronic stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20(4):541–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, et al. Using the cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP) with adults with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(2):115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, Binns MA, Hunt A, et al. Occupation-based strategy training for adults with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(10):1959–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob J, Lai WY, Khanukayeva S, et al. A systematic review of cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) on motor outcomes for adults with acquired brain injury. Am J Occ Ther. 2020;74(4_Supplement_1):7411520492p1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob J, Khanukayeva S, Jacob, Lai WY, et al. Effectiveness of CO-OP to improve motor performance for adults with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Unpublished manuscript. Available from: [email protected]
   Google Scholar
• Houldin A, McEwen SE, Howell MW, et al. The cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach and transfer: a scoping review. OTJR. 2018;38(3):157–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamit T, Shames J, Rand D. Effectiveness of the functional and cognitive occupational therapy (FaCoT) intervention for improving daily functioning and participation of individuals with mild stroke: a randomized controlled trial. IJERPH. 2021;18(15):7988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin DJ, Finklestein SP, Cramer SC. New directions in treatments targeting stroke recovery. Stroke. 2018;49(12):3107–3114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver KE, Adey‐Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1(1):CD010255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beit Yosef A, Jacobs JM, Shenkar S, et al. Activity performance, participation, and quality of life among adults in the chronic stage after acquired brain injury—the feasibility of an occupation-based telerehabilitation intervention. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beit Yosef A, Jacobs JM, Shames J, et al. A performance-based teleintervention for adults in the chronic stage after acquired brain injury: an exploratory pilot randomized controlled crossover study. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):213. 3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson EB, Heinemann AW. Rasch analysis of the executive interview (the EXIT-25) and introduction of an abridged version (the quick EXIT). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Spencer M, Folstein M. The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1988;1(2):111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Williams LS, Brizendine EJ, Plue L, et al. Performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression after stroke. stroke. 2005;36(3):635–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson T. Skype security evaluation [Internet]. Palo Alto, CA: Anagram Laboratories; 2005. Available from: http://www.anagram.com/berson/skyeval.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mandich A, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation in children: the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, McEwen S, Polatajko H. Enabling participation across the lifespan: advancements, adaptations and extensions of the CO-OP approach. Bethesda (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chui A, Dawson DR, McEwen S, et al. CO-OP approach toolkit. In: Dawson DR, McEwen S, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling participation across the lifespan: advancements, adaptations and extensions of the CO-OP approach. Bethesda (MD): AOTA Press; 2017. p. 227–254.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. Second edition (WASI-II). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampshire A, Highfield RR, Parkin BL, et al. Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron. 2012;76(6):1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine B, Bacopoulos A, Anderson ND, et al. Validation of a novel computerized test battery for automated testing. Poster session presented at: Rotman Research Institute Conference; 2013 March 8–11; Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, et al. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Planning. 1979;2(3):197–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The Hopkins rehabilitation engagement rating scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(7):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Carswell A, Law M. Research on the Canadian occupational performance measure: an annotated resource. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71(4):210–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourget N, Deblock-Bellamy A, Blanchette AK, et al. Use and psychometric properties of the reintegration to normal living index in rehabilitation: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61(4):262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(5):625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Winocur G, Craik FI, Levine B, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation in the elderly: overview and future directions. J Int Neuropsych Soc. 2007;13(1):166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen S, Polatajko H, Baum C, et al. Combined cognitive-strategy and task-specific training improve transfer to untrained activities in subacute stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(6):526–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Polatajko H, Baum C, et al. Combined cognitive-strategy and task-specific training affects cognition and upper-extremity function in subacute stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(2):7002290010p1–7002290010p10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C, Lee O, Woo H. Cognitive strategy on upper extremity function for stroke: a randomized controlled trials. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(1):61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen S, Houldin A. Generalization and transfer in the CO-OP approach. In: Dawson DR, McEwen S, Polatajko HJ, editors. Enabling participation across the lifespan: advancements, adaptations and extensions of the CO-OP approach. Bethesda (MD): AOTA Press; 2017. p. 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Geusgens CA, Winkens I, van Heugten C, et al. Occurrence and measurement of transfer in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(6):425–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadi-Najafabadi S, Zwicker JG. White matter changes with rehabilitation in children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; p. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf TJ, Doherty M, Kallogjeri D, et al. The feasibility of using metacognitive strategy training to improve cognitive performance and neural connectivity in women with chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment. Oncology. 2016;91(3):143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar