Training prosthesis users to switch between modes of a multi-articulating prosthetic hand

References

• Heerschop A, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Transfer of mode switching performance: from training to upper-limb prosthesis use. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021;18(1):85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belter JT, Segil JL, Dollar AM, et al. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(5):599–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atzori M, Müller H. Control capabilities of myoelectric robotic prostheses by hand amputees: a scientific research and market overview. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:162. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4663252/.
   Google Scholar
• Kuiken TA, Miller LA, Turner K, et al. A comparison of pattern recognition control and direct control of a multiple degree-of-Freedom transradial prosthesis. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. 2016;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zheng Y-P, Guo J-Y, et al. Sonomyography (SMG) control for powered prosthetic hand: a study with normal subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(7):1076–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K, et al. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):318–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farina D, Jiang N, Rehbaum H, et al. The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper-limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(4):797–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilarino M, Moon J, Pool KR, et al. Outcomes and perception of a conventional and alternative myoelectric control strategy: a study of experienced and new multiarticulating hand users. J. Prosthetics Orthotics. 2015;27:10.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk L, van Sluis CK, van der Dijk HW, et al. Learning an EMG controlled game: task-specific adaptations and transfer. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk L, van Sluis CK, van der Dijk HW, et al. Task-oriented gaming for transfer to prosthesis use. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24:1384–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerschop A, van der Sluis CK, Otten E, et al. Looking beyond proportional control: the relevance of mode switching in learning to operate multi-articulating myoelectric upper-limb prostheses. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;55:101647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, et al. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):479–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franzke AW, Kristoffersen MB, Bongers RM, et al. Users’ and therapists’ perceptions of myoelectric multi-function upper limb prostheses with conventional and pattern recognition control. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen MB, Franzke AW, Bongers RM, et al. User training for machine learning controlled upper limb prostheses: a serious game approach. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021;18(1):32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Changes in performance over time while learning to use a myoelectric prosthesis. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2014;11(1):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. Learning to control opening and closing a myoelectric hand. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9):1442–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romkema S, Bongers RM, van der Sluis CK. Intermanual transfer in training with an Upper-Limb myoelectric prosthesis simulator: a mechanistic, randomized, pretest–posttest study. Phys Ther. 2013;93(1):22–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: CRC Press; 1995, p. 189.
   Google Scholar
• Rozevink SG, van der Sluis CK, Garzo A, et al. HoMEcare aRm rehabiLItatioN (MERLIN): telerehabilitation using an unactuated device based on serious games improves the upper limb function in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021;18(1):48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangor A. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 2009;4:10.
   Google Scholar
• Hussaini A, Kyberd P. Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(3):294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasluian E, Bongers RM, Reinders-Messelink HA, et al. Preliminary study of the Southampton hand assessment procedure for children and its reliability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ. Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):776–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Cancio JM, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Southampton hand assessment procedure (SHAP) in a sample of upper limb prosthesis users. J. Hand Therapy. 2021; [cited 2021 Sep 25]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113021001113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor A, Bateman S, Scheme E. Evaluation of myoelectric control learning using multi-session game-based training. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018;26(9):1680–1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrove L, Miller L, Turner KL, et al. Myoelectric pattern recognition outperforms direct control for transhumeral amputees with targeted muscle reinnervation: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radhakrishnan SM, Baker SN, Jackson A. Learning a novel myoelectric-controlled interface task. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100(4):2397–2408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison M, Artemiadis P. Enhancing practical multifunctional myoelectric applications through implicit motor control training systems. 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Chicago, IL: IEEE; 2014. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. p. 3525–3528. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6944383/.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf G, Prinz W. Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8(4):648–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totsika V, Wulf G. The influence of external and internal foci of attention on transfer to novel situations and skills. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(2):220–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peh SY-C, Chow JY, Davids K. Focus of attention and its impact on movement behaviour. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(1):70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poolton JM, Maxwell JP, Masters RSW, et al. Benefits of an external focus of attention: common coding or conscious processing? J Sports Sci. 2006;24(1):89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar