The influence of facemasks on communication in healthcare settings: a systematic review

References

• Garcia LP. Use of facemasks to limit COVID-19 transmission. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2020;29(2):e2020023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Morgenstern C, Kelly J, et al. The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission across 130 countries and territories. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi K, Lwin C. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e041383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perra N. Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Phys Rep. 2021;913:1–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Health Protection. Coronavirus, Wearing of Face-Coverings in a Relevant Place (England) Regulations 2020. UK Statutory Instruments 2020 No 791. UK Government; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mahase E. Covid-19: are cloth masks still effective? And other questions answered. BMJ. 2021;372:n432–n432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Round M, Isherwood P. Speech intelligibility in respiratory protective equipment – Implications for verbal communication in critical care. Trends Anaesth Critl Care. 2021;36:23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd M. Broken communication in nursing can kill: teaching communication is vital. Creat Nurs. 2013;19(2):101–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trotter AR, Matt SB, Wojnar D. Communication strategies and accommodations utilized by health care providers with hearing loss: a pilot study. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(1):7–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel L, Gardino J, Atcherson S. Speech understanding using surgical masks: a problem in health care? Am J Audiol. 2008;19:686–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzke I, Rosenbaum M, Cox C, et al. Effect of clear vs standard covered masks on communication with patients during surgical clinic encounters: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(4):372–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer EC, Sellers DE, Browning DM, et al. Difficult conversations: improving communication skills and relational abilities in health care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10(3):352–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corey R, Jones U, Singer A. Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2020;148(4):2371–2375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüfner K, Hofer A, Sperner-Unterweger B. On the difficulties of building therapeutic relationships when wearing face masks. J Psychosom Res. 2020;138:110226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmiero A, Symons D, Morgan IJ, et al. Facemasks and air-purifying respirators. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016;13(12):960–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson H. USA: objections to protective respirators. Lancet. 1992;340(8827):1088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atcherson S, McDowell B, Howard M. Acoustic effects of non-transparent and transparent face coverings. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021;149(4):2249–2254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens-Hofman M, Terband H, Snik A, et al. Speech characteristics and intelligibility in adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2016;68(4):175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppel D. Speech perception. In Social cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, clinical brain mapping. Vol 3. Elsevier Inc. 2015. p.429–434.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Addressing the rising prevalence of hearing loss. ISBN 978-92-4-155026-0 © 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Turton L, Smith P. Prevalence & characteristics of severe and profound hearing loss in adults in a UK national health service clinic. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(2):92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasserson TJ, Thomas J, Higgins JPT. Chapter 1: starting a review. In: higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated february 2021). Cochrane, 2021. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):e78–336–b2535.
   Google Scholar
• Moskalewicz A, Oremus M. No clear choice between Newcastle–Ottawa scale and appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies to assess methodological quality in cross-sectional studies of health-related quality of life and breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;120:94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses, 2012. Available from: http://wwwohrica/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxfordasp.
   Google Scholar
• Llamas C, Harrison P, Donnelly D, et al. Effects of different types of face coverings on speech acoustics and intelligibility. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2. 2008;9:80–104. http://www.york.ac.uk/language/ypl/ypl2issue9/YPL9_04_Llamas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bottalico P, Murgia S, Puglisi G, et al. Effect of masks on speech intelligibility in auralized classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;148(5):2878–2884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Mohanty AR. HVAC noise control using natural materials to improve vehicle interior sound quality. Appl Acoust. 2018;140:100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Munjal SK, Sharma A, et al. Effect of face masks on speech understanding: a clinical perspective during speech audiometry. J Otol. 2022;17(3):140–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou P, Zong S, Xi X, et al. Effect of wearing personal protective equipment on acoustic characteristics and speech perception during COVID-19. Appl Acoust. 2022;197:108940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon IJ, Jo M, Kim GY, et al. How does a face mask impact speech perception? Healthcare. 2022;10(9):1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandaru S, Augustine A, Lepcha A, et al. The effects of N95 mask and face shield on speech perception among healthcare workers in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic scenario. J Laryngol Otol. 2020;134(10):895–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee M, Lewis C, Noffs G, et al. Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: implications for peri-pandemic protocols. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;148(6):3562–3568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radonovich L, Yanke R, Cheng J, et al. Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010;7(1):63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter E, Miller C, Morse J, et al. Impact of masks on speech recognition in adult patients with and without hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2022;84(4):302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutz SE, Rowe HP, Tilton-Bolowsky VE, et al. Speaking with a KN95 face mask: a within-subjects study on speaker adaptation and strategies to improve intelligibility. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022;7(1):73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atcherson S, Mendel L, Baltimore W, et al. The effect of conventional and transparent surgical masks on speech understanding in individuals with and without hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2017;28:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton T, Crunkhorn R, Lowe N, et al. Speech discrimination challenges of healthcare professionals whilst wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Authorea. 2020; http://www.york.ac.uk/language/ypl/ypl2issue9/YPL9_04_Llamas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weiss R, Guchlerner L, Weissgerber T, et al. Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16(1):43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans NC, Vroegop JL. The impact of face masks on the communication of adults with hearing loss during COVID-19 in a clinical setting. Int J Audiol. 2022; 61(5):365–370. Epub 2021 Jul 28. PMID: 34319825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95(2):1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution (BSI). 2011. EN 60268-16:2011: sound system equipment. Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. British Standards Institute: London. https://bsol-bsigroup-com.ezproxy.napier.ac.uk/Bibliographic/BibliographicInfoData/000000000030249993
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Care 2022. Guidance document: transparent face mask technical specification. Cabinet Office, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-specifications-for-personal-protective-equipment-ppe/transparent-face-mask-technical-specification#:∼:text=A%20transparent%20face%20mask%20can,and%20those%20with%20learning%20disabilities
   Google Scholar
• Pörschmann C, Lübeck T, Arend J. Impact of face masks on voice radiation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;148(6):3663–3670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976;264(5588):746–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chládková K, Podlipský V, Nudga N, et al. The McGurk effect in the time of pandemic: age-dependent adaptation to an environmental loss of visual speech cues. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021;28(3):992–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar