Measuring mealtime performance in older adults with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia: an updated systematic review of psychometric properties

References

• Rivelsrud MC, Hartelius L, Bergström L, et al. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults in different healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):76–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sire A, Ferrillo M, Lippi L, et al. Sarcopenic dysphagia, malnutrition, and oral frailty in elderly: a comprehensive review. Nutrients. 2022;14(5):982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonschot RJ, Baijens LW, Vanbelle S, et al. Affective symptoms in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2017;97:102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan K, Speyer R, Heijnen BJ, et al. Living with oropharyngeal dysphagia: effects of bolus modification on health-related quality of life–a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(10):2447–2456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westmark S, Melgaard D, Rethmeier LO, et al. The cost of dysphagia in geriatric patients. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;10:321–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan TN, Ho WC, Wang LH, et al. Prevalence and methods for assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JCM. 2022;11(9):2605.
   Google Scholar
• Speyer R, Cordier R, Farneti D, et al. White paper by the European society for swallowing disorders: screening and non-instrumental assessment for dysphagia in adults. Dysphagia. 2022;37(2):333–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brates D, Troche MS, Molfenter SM. The role of fatigue in the aging swallow: a review. OBM Geriat. 2020;05(02):166.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nund RL, Brown B, Ward EC, et al. What are we really measuring? A content comparison of swallowing outcome measures for head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Dysphagia. 2019;34(4):575–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Kjaersgaard A, Faber J. Measuring elderly dysphagic patients’ performance in eating–a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21–22):1931–1940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaru Y, Matsugi A, Masaki S, et al. Premature oral pre-shaping for feeding in elderly population with risk of aspiration pneumonia. PLOS One. 2021;16(2):e0246804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen KT, Wæhrens EE. Occupational therapy evaluation: use of self-report and/or observation? Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(1):13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Boers M, van der Vleuten CPM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher AG, Griswold LA. Performance skills: implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In: Schell BAB & Gillen G, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. p. 335–350
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer JC, Damanik R, Ho MH, et al. Review of food intake difficulty assessment tools for people with dementia. West J Nurs Res. 2021;43(12):1132–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung D, Lee K, De Gagne JC, et al. Eating difficulties among older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Prinsen CA, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual. 2018. https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Vet HC, Prinsen CA, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual. 2018. https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, de Boers M, van der Vleuten C, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instrument. User manual. 2021. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/user-manual-COSMIN-Risk-of-Bias-tool_v4_JAN_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison H, Griffin SJ, Kuhn I, et al. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice. Philadelphia (PA): FA Davis; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu MF, Miao NF, Chen IH, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese feeding difficulty index (Ch-FDI) for people with dementia. PLOS One. 2015;10(7):e0133716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Lin YF, Chiu CH, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with food intake difficulties among residents with dementia. PLOS One. 2017;12(2):e0171770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully MW, Matrakas KL, Muir J, et al. The eating behavior scale: a simple method of assessing functional ability in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol Nurs. 1997;23(7):9–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLaren SMG, Dickerson WT. Measurement of eating disability in an acute stroke population. Clin Eff Nurs. 2000;4:109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Maeda K, Shamoto H, Wakabayashi H, et al. Reliability and validity of a simplified comprehensive assessment tool for feeding support: Kuchi-Kara Taberu index. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(12):e248–e252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonosaki K, Yonenaga K, Ono S, et al. Swallowing evaluation by the Kuchikara Taberu Balance Chart and videoendscopic examination reveals that respiratory conditions, chewing, and position are strongly related to dysphagia. Odontology. 2021;109(2):448–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzorni N, Valentini D, Gilardone M, et al. The mealtime assessment scale (MAS): part 1 – Development of a scale for meal assessment. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(3):169–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzorni N, Valentini D, Gilardone M, et al. The mealtime assessment scale (MAS): part 2 – Preliminary psychometric analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(3):182–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi G, Galeoto G, Amitrano A, et al. Development and validation of a new mealtime assessment tool (MAT) for patients with dysphagia: a cross sectional study. Clin Ter. 2020;171(4):e346–e356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergren A, Mitra Unosson M, Ohlsson O, et al. Eating difficulties, assisted eating and nutritional status in elderly (65 years) patients in hospital rehabilitation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;39(3):341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergren A, Lindholm C, Mattsson A, et al. Minimal Eating Observation Form: reliability and validity. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(1):6–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergren A. The minimal Eating Observation Form-version II revisited: validity and reliability. J Nurs Meas. 2019;27(3):478–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Gisel EG, Groher ME, et al. McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA): development and first field test of an evaluation of functional ingestive skills of elderly persons. Dysphagia. 2003;18(2):101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Abrahamowicz M, Groher ME, et al. The McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment predicts time to death in an elderly population with neurogenic dysphagia: preliminary evidence. Dysphagia. 2005;20(2):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert HC, Gisel EG, Groher ME, et al. Psychometric testing of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60(4):409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmine FB, Wood-Dauphinee S, Gisel E. The discriminative validity of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment. Phys. Occup. Ther. 2013;31(2):148–158.
   Google Scholar
• Wang T, Jiang H, Westergren A, et al. The Minimal Eating Observation Form-II (MEOF-II): cross-cultural validation of the Chinese version for people with stroke. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(2):207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergren A, Melgaard D. The Minimal Eating Observation Form-II Danish version: psychometric and metrological aspects. J Nurs Meas. 2020;28(1):168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Lambert HC, Faber J. Content validation of a Danish version of “the McGill ingestive skills assessment” for dysphagia management. Scand J Occup Ther. 2011;18(4):282–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Lambert HC, Faber J. Validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment using classical test theory and the Rasch model. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(10):859–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T. Further validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment (MISA-DK): Rasch analysis. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2014;21:26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Lambert HC, Faber J. Reliability of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment for observation-based measures during meals. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(6):488–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen T, Melgaard Kristiansen D. Revisiting the psychometric properties of a revised Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment. Cogent Med. 2017;4(1):1281558.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen K, Kreiner S, Mesbar M. Rasch models in health. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna SP, Heaney A. Setting and maintaining standards for patient-reported outcome measures: can we rely on the COSMIN checklists? J Med Econ. 2021;24(1):502–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Peipert JD, Chapman R, et al. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2729–2754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar