431
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Family Empowerment Scale

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 856-869 | Received 17 Jun 2022, Accepted 06 Feb 2023, Published online: 26 Feb 2023

References

  • World Health Organization. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. p. 37.
  • Early TJ. Measures for practice with families from a strengths perspective. Fam Soc. 2001;82(3):225–232.
  • Herbert RJ, Gagnon AJ, Rennick JE, et al. A systematic review of questionnaires measuring health-related empowerment. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2009;23(2):107–132.
  • Cyril S, Smith BJ, Renzaho AMN. Systematic review of empowerment measures in health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):809–826.
  • Koren PE, DeChillo N, Friesen BJ. Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: a brief questionnaire. Rehabil Psychol. 1992;37(4):305–321.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
  • Vuorenmaa M, Halme N, Åstedt‐Kurki P, et al. The validity and reliability of the Finnish Family Empowerment Scale (FES): a survey of parents with small children. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40(4):597–606.
  • Hayslip B, Smith GC, Montoro-Rodriguez J, et al. The utility of the family empowerment scale with custodial grandmothers. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36(3):320–350.
  • Segers EW, van den Hoogen A, van Eerden IC, et al. Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the family empowerment scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: a mixed-methods study. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(1):111–120.
  • Singh NN, Curtis WJ, Ellis CR, et al. Psychometric analysis of the family empowerment scale. J Emot Behav Disord. 1995;3(2):85–91.
  • Kageyama M, Nakamura Y, Kobayashi S, et al. Validity and reliability of the family empowerment scale for caregivers of adults with mental health issues. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23(8):521–531.
  • Wakimizu R, Fujioka H, Furuya K, et al. Development of the Japanese version of family empowerment scale (J-FES). J Health Welfare Stat. 2010;11:33–41.
  • Nieuwboer CC, Fukkink RG, Hermanns JMA. Single session email consultation for parents: an evaluation of its effect on empowerment. Br J Guid Couns. 2015;43(1):131–143.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) – User manual [internet]. The Netherlands: VU University Medical Center; 2018. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018-1.pdf
  • Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs – User manual [Internet]. The Netherlands: VU University Medical Center; 2017. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf
  • Lee J, Lee E-H, Moon SH. Systematic review of the measurement properties of the depression anxiety stress scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(9):2325–2339.
  • COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments). COSMIN definitions of domains, measurement properties, and aspects of measurement properties [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-definitions-domains-measurement-properties.pdf
  • Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software, Melbourne Australia [Internet]; 2022. Available from: www.covidence.org
  • Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ. 2005;331(7524):1064–1065.
  • Gardner PL. Measuring attitudes to science: unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited. Research in Science Education. 1995;25(3):283–289.
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Chapter 2. Basic concepts. Health measurement Scales - A practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 7–18.
  • Kane M. The Argument-Based approach to validation. Sch Psychol Rev. 2013;42(4):448–457.
  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
  • Florian V, Elad D. The impact of mothers’ sense of empowerment on the metabolic control of their children with juvenile diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 1998;23(4):239–247.
  • Gerkensmeyer JE, Perkins SM, Scott EL, et al. Depressive symptoms among primary caregivers of children with mental health needs: mediating and moderating variables. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008;22(3):135–146.
  • Huscroft-D'Angelo J, Hurley KD, Lambert M, et al. Investigating the factor structure and validity of the family empowerment scale for parents of children with emotional disturbance in middle school. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;86:14–20.
  • Lambert MC, Trout AL, Huscroft-D’Angelo J, et al. Psychometrics of family empowerment scale scores for caregivers of youth transitioning from therapeutic residential care. J Public Child Welf. 2020;15:1–16.
  • Boztepe H, Çınar S, Kanbay Y, et al. Validity and reliability of the family empowerment scale for parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate. Child. 2022;48(2):277–285.
  • Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435–441.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau releases 2014–2018 ACS 5-year estimates [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=United%20States
  • Samuel PS, Tarraf W, Marsack C. Family quality of life survey (FQOLS-2006): evaluation of internal consistency, construct, and criterion validity for socioeconomically disadvantaged families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018;38(1):46–63.
  • Hagell P, Hedin P-J, Meads DM, et al. Effects of method of translation of Patient-Reported health outcome questionnaires: a randomized study of the translation of the rheumatoid arthritis quality of life (RAQoL) instrument for Sweden. Value Health. 2010;13(4):424–430.
  • Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):212–232.
  • Hambleton RK, Patsula L. Increasing the validity of adapted tests: myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. JATT. 1999;1:1–13.
  • Reise SP, Morizot J, Hays RD. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(S1):19–31.
  • Weiss JA, Cappadocia MC, MacMullin JA, et al. The impact of child problem behaviors of children with ASD on parent mental health: the mediating role of acceptance and empowerment. Autism. 2012;16(3):261–274.
  • Weiss JA, Robinson S, Fung S, et al. Family hardiness, social support, and self-efficacy in mothers of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7(11):1310–1317.
  • Cohen SR, Holloway SD, Domínguez-Pareto I, et al. Support and self-efficacy among Latino and White parents of children with ID. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;120(1):16–31.
  • Resendez MG, Quist RM, Matshazi DGM. A longitudinal analysis of family empowerment and client outcomes. J Child Fam Stud. 2000;9(4):449–460.
  • Tse YJ, McCarty CA, Stoep AV, et al. Teletherapy delivery of caregiver behavior training for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(6):451–458.
  • Lucksted A, Medoff D, Burland J, et al. Sustained outcomes of a peer-taught family education program on mental illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127(4):279–286.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association; 2013.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.