Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI/T) in patients with cervicogenic headache

References

• Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(3):193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Raggi A. A narrative review on the burden of migraine: when the burden is the impact on people’s life. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaastad O, Bakketeig LS. Prevalence of cervicogenic headache: vaga study of headache epidemiology. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008; Mar117(3):173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony M. Cervicogenic headache: prevalence and response to local steroid therapy. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000;18(2 Suppl 19):S59–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman S, Dagenais S. Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review. Spine J. 2001;1(1):31–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Headache Classification Committee of the İnternational Headache Society (IHS). The ınternational classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen TA, Hovdal H, Sjaastad O. Cervicogenic headache: clinical manifestation. Cephalalgia. 1987;7(2):147–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote P, Yu H, Shearer HM, et al. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: a clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(6):1051–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull G, Amiri M, Bullock-Saxton J, et al. Cervical musculoskeletal impairment in frequent intermittent headache. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(7):793–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson N. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18(7):435–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borusiak P, Biedermann H, Bosserhoff S, et al. Lack of efficacy of manual therapy in children and adolescents with suspected cervicogenic headache: results of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and blinded trial. Headache. 2010;50(2):224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell MB, Rasmussen BK, Brennum J, et al. Presentation of a new instrument: the diagnostic headache diary. Cephalalgia. 1992;12(6):369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunning J, Butts R, Zacharko N, et al. Spinal manipulation and perineural electrical dry needling in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Spine J. 2021;21(2):284–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari M, Bahrpeyma F, Togha M. Effect of ischemic compression for cervicogenic headache and elastic behavior of active trigger point in the sternocleidomastoid muscle using ultrasound imaging. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(4):933–939.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park MS, Choi HJ, Yang JS, et al. Clinical efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency treatment targeting the mid-cervical medial branches for intractable cervicogenic headache. Clin J Pain. 2021;37(3):206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satpute K, Bedekar N, Hall T. Effectiveness of Mulligan manual therapy over exercise on headache frequency, intensity and disability for patients with migraine, tension-type headache and cervicogenic headache – a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aal NM, Elsayyad MM, Megahed AA. Short-term effect of adding Graston technique to exercise program in treatment of patients with cervicogenic headache: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;57(5):758–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashif M, Manzoor N, Safdar R, et al. Effectiveness of sustained natural apophyseal glides in females with cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(3):597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Guo T, Xu L, et al. Cervicogenic headache treated by acupuncture based on jin theory: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dikmen PY, Bozdağ M, Güneş M, et al. Reliability and validity of turkish version of headache ımpact test (HIT-6) in patients with migraine. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021;58(4):300–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ertaş M, Siva A, Dalkara T, Turkish MIDAS group, et al. Validity and reliability of the turkish migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache. 2004; 44(8):786–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson GP, Ramadan NM, Aggarwal SK, et al. The Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Neurology. 1994;44(5):837–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco LR, García FJC, Picabia IB. Conductas de dolor y discapacidad en migrañas y cefaleas tensionales. Adaptación Española Del Pain Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ) y Del Headache Disability Inventory (HDI). Análisis y Modificación De Conducta. 2000;26(109):739–762.
   Google Scholar
• Pradela J, Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Cristina Chaves T, et al. Brazilian Portuguese version of the headache disability ınventory: cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(2):156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbari S, Salahzadeh Z, Sarbakhsh P, et al. Validity and reliability of Persian version of henry ford hospital headache disability ınventory questionnaire. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(10):752–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakoç A, Dönmez L. Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2014;13(40):39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Keeves JP. Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook. Pergamon Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, et al. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(8):963–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability ındex: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine. 2009;34(16):1732–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskin M, Harlak H, Demirkiran F, et al. The adaptation of the perceived stress scale into turkish: a reliability and validity analysis. New Symp J. 2013;51(3):132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981;15(3 Pt 1):221–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kucukdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, et al. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham health profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arikan H, Citaker S, Ucok C. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Tturkish version of the craniofacial pain and disability ınventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(3):523–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldhof GJ, Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ. Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods. 2014;19(1):72–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting ıntraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prion S, Haerling KA. Making sense of methods and measurement: spearman-rho ranked-order correlation coefficient. Clin Sim Nurs. 2014;10(10):535–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice. FA Davis; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56(1):27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalili Y, Ly N, Murphy PB. Cervicogenic headache. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Arica Polat BS, Sarilar AC. The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among turkish patients with primary headache. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(4):1994–1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys. Headache. 2021;61(1):60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar