Sex-related differential item functioning of neck disability index

References

• Vernon H. The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):491–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young IPD, Dunning JPD, Butts RPP, et al. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(12):1328–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, et al. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine. 2002;27(5):515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailliet L, Knol DL, Rubinstein SM, et al. Definition of the construct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of validity. The neck disability index as an example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):775–782. quiz 782.e1–782.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen JB, Andelic N, Bakke E, et al. Measurement properties of the norwegian version of the neck disability index in chronic neck pain. Spine. 2013;38(10):851–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Velde G, Beaton D, Hogg-Johnston S, et al. Rasch analysis provides new insights into the measurement properties of the neck disability index. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):544–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DM, MacDermid JC. A brief 5-item version of the neck disability index shows good psychometric properties. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20—79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997;26(1):15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massy-Westropp NM, Gill TK, Taylor AW, et al. Hand grip strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunn AJ, Gregg I. New regression equations for predicting peak expiratory flow in adults. BMJ. 1989;298(6680):1068–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitt R. A study of the sit-up type of test as a means of measuring strength and endurance of the abdominal muscles. Res Q Am Assoc Health Phys Educ. 2013;15(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Gelin M, Zumbo B. Differential item functioning results may change depending on how item is scored: an illustration with the center for epidemiologicstudies depression scale. Educ Psychol Meas. 2003;63(1):65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleishman JA, Spector WD, Altman BM. Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability. J Gerontol Part B. 2002;57B(5):10.
   Google Scholar
• Merril SS, Kasl S, Bergman L. Gender differences in the comparison of self-reported disability and performance measures. J Gerontol Part A. 1997;52A(1):8.
   Google Scholar
• Bingefors K, Isacson D. Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain–a gender perspective. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(5):435–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering G, Jourdan D, Eschalier A, et al. Impact of age, gender and cognitive functioning on pain perception. Gerontology. 2002;48(2):112–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley EJ, Fillingim RB. Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(1):52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comins J, Brodersen J, Wedderkopp N, et al. Psychometric validation of the danish version of the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2020;45(16):1143–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson M. Rasch analysis of three versions of the oswestry disability questionnaire. Man Ther. 2008;13(3):222–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu YM, Wu YY, Hsieh CL, et al. Measurement precision of the disability for back pain scale-by applying rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker FB. The basics of item reponse theory. 2nd ed. College Park (MD): ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• De Boeck PW. Explanatory item response models. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ. Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. J Educational Measurement. 1990;27(4):361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkers NF, Galan I, Kerbrat A, et al. Differential item functioning of the arm function in multiple sclerosis questionnaire (AMSQ) by language, a study in six countries. Mult Scler. 2021;27(1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DJ, Werth PM, Christensen DD, et al. Differential item functioning to validate setting of delivery compatibility in PROMIS-global health. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(7):2189–2200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penton H, Dayson C, Hulme C, et al. An investigation of age-related differential item functioning in the EQ-5D-5L using item response theory and logistic regression. Value Health. 2022;25(9):1566–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnhoven HA, de Vet HC, Picavet HS. Explaining sex differences in chronic musculoskeletal pain in a general population. Pain. 2006;124(1–2):158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, et al. “Brave men” and “emotional women”: a theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018;2018:6358624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley RW, Adams MC. Sex, gender, and pain: an overview of a complex field. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieretti S, Di Giannuario A, Di Giovannandrea R, et al. Gender differences in pain and its relief. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(2):184–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernardes SF, Keogh E, Lima ML. Bridging the gap between pain and gender research: a selective literature review. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(4):427–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh E. The gender context of pain. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;15(3):454–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveille SG, Resnick HE, Balfour J. Gender differences in disability: evidence and underlying reasons. Aging. 2000;12(2):106–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjogren K, Stjernberg L. A gender perspective on factors that influence outdoor recreational physical activity among the elderly. BMC Geriatr. 2010;10:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. TED: The Economics Daily image. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2020/men-spent-5-point-5-hours-per-day-in-leisure-activities-women-4-point-9-hours-in-2019.htm
   Google Scholar