Prevalence of secondary prosthesis use in lower limb prosthesis users

References

• Schaffalitzky E, NiMhurchadha S, Gallagher P, et al. Identifying the values and preferences of prosthetic users: a case study series using the repertory grid technique. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keszler MS, Heckman JT, Kaufman GE, et al. Advances in prosthetics and rehabilitation of individuals with limb loss. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019;30(2):423–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll K, Rheinstein J, Pollard E. Understanding and selecting prosthetic feet. In: Chui KC, Jorge M, Yen SC, Lusardi MM, editors. Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation; 2020. p. 566–576.
   Google Scholar
• Langford J, Dillon MP, Granger CL, et al. Physical activity participation amongst individuals with lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(9):1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobler L, Derman W. Sport-specific limb prostheses in Para sport. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018;29(2):371–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragaru M, Dekker R, Geertzen JH. Sport prostheses and prosthetic adaptations for the upper and lower limb amputees: an overview of peer reviewed literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(3):290–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonsiri J, van Putten SWE, Ausma AT, et al. Are consumers satisfied with the use of prosthetic sports feet and the provision process? A mixed-methods study. Med Hypotheses. 2020;143:109869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aetna Inc. Lower limb prostheses; 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 26]. http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/500_599/0578.html
   Google Scholar
• Cigna Companies. Medical coverage policy: prosthetic devices; 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 26]. https://static.cigna.com/assets/chcp/pdf/coveragePolicies/medical/mm_0536_coveragepositioncriteria_prosthetic_devices.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kars C, Hofman M, Geertzen JH, et al. Participation in sports by lower limb amputees in the province of Drenthe, The Netherlands. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(4):356–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta D, Vaidya SP, Alsindi Z. Analyses of prosthetic episodes in trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1999;23(1):9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair A, Hanspal RS, Zahedi MS, et al. Analyses of prosthetic episodes in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(1):42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal RS, Nieveen R. Water activity limbs. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2002;26(3):218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll K. Adaptive prosthetics for the lower extremity. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6(2):371–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sepp LA, Baum BS, Nelson-Wong E, et al. Joint work and ground reaction forces during running with daily-use and running-specific prostheses. J Biomech. 2020;101:109629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum BS, Hobara H, Koh K, et al. Amputee locomotion: joint moment adaptations to running speed using running-specific prostheses after unilateral transtibial amputation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(3):182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobara H, Baum BS, Kwon HJ, et al. Amputee locomotion: lower extremity loading using running-specific prostheses. Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):386–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schvirtz E, Bensoussan L, Tourret Couderc B, et al. Return to surfing using an adapted prosthesis: a case report. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(4):455–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis S, Callaway A, Dyer B. The influence of lower-limb prostheses technology on paracanoeing time-trial performance. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(6):568–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amtmann D, Abrahamson D, Morgan S, et al. The plus-M: item bank of mobility for prosthetic limb users. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:39–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly VE, Morgan SJ, Amtmann D, et al. Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, Balkman GS, et al. Modifying the Five-Time Sit-To-Stand test to allow use of the upper limbs: assessing initial evidence of construct validity among lower limb prosthesis users. PLOS One. 2023;18(2):e0279543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, et al. Construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (plus-M) in adults with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):277–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M™) version 1.2 short forms users guide; 2014 [cited 2022 Apr 25]. http://www.plus-m.org
   Google Scholar
• Morgan SJ, Liljenquist KS, Kajlich A, et al. Mobility with a lower limb prosthesis: experiences of users with high levels of functional ability. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(13):3236–3244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees II: comorbidities and mobility in lower limb prosthesis users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(11):782–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, et al. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): normative mobility values for lower limb prosthesis users of varying age, etiology, and amputation level. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(9):850–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shutze W, Gable D, Ogola G, et al. Sex, age, and other barriers for prosthetic referral following amputation and the impact on survival. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(5):1659–1667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A, et al. Gender differences in amputation outcome. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):122–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed T, Vafaei A, Auais M, et al. Gender roles and physical function in older adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Mobility in Aging Study (IMIAS). PLOS One. 2016;11(6):e0156828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárcamo C, Moreno A, del Barrio C. Girls do not sweat: the development of gender stereotypes in physical education in primary school. Hum Arenas. 2021;4(2):196–217.
   Google Scholar
• Lancet Public Health. Time to tackle the physical activity gender gap. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(8):e360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colella TJ, Gravely S, Marzolini S, et al. Sex bias in referral of women to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation? A meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(4):423–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Torgé CJ, Fristedt S, et al. Relationships and gender differences within and between assessments used in Swedish Home Rehabilitation – a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålnacke BM, Haukenes I, Lehti A, et al. Is there a gender bias in recommendations for further rehabilitation in primary care of patients with chronic pain after an interdisciplinary team assessment? J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(4):365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M. Predicting prosthetic prescription after major lower-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(6):641–652.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinglass J, Rucker-Whitaker C, Lindquist L, et al. Racial differences in primary and repeat lower extremity amputation: results from a multihospital study. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(5):823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller TA, Campbell JH, Bloom N, et al. Racial disparities in health care with timing to amputation following diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(10):2336–2341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odonkor CA, Esparza R, Flores LE, et al. Disparities in health care for black patients in physical medicine and rehabilitation in the United States: a narrative review. PM&R. 2021;13(2):180–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradies Y, Ben J, Denson N, et al. Racism as a determinant of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2015;10(9):e0138511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agénor M, et al. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1453–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFave SE, Suen JJ, Seau Q, et al. Racism and older Black Americans’ health: a systematic review. J Urban Health. 2022;99(1):28–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etter K, Borgia M, Resnik L. Prescription and repair rates of prosthetic limbs in the VA Healthcare System: implications for national prosthetic parity. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(6):493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin B, Harvey IS. Ageism in the fitness and health industry: a review of the literature. J Aging Phys Act. 2021;29(1):99–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnes D, Sheppard C, Henderson CR Jr., et al. Interventions to reduce ageism against older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(8):e1–e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SS, Brownell KD, Wadden TA. The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(10):1333–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabin JA, Marini M, Nosek BA. Implicit and explicit anti-fat bias among a large sample of medical doctors by BMI, race/ethnicity and gender. PLOS One. 2012;7(11):e48448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardeman RR, Hardeman-Jones SL, Medina EM. Fighting for America’s Paradise: the struggle against structural racism. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021;46(4):563–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar