“Are we there yet?” expectations and experiences with lower limb robotic exoskeletons: a qualitative evaluation of the therapist perspective

References

• World Health Organisation. Spinal cord injury. 2013 [cited 2020 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury
   Google Scholar
• Whyte E, Skidmore E, Aizenstein H, et al. Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions. PM R. 2011;3(6 Suppl 1):S45–S51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postol N, Marquez J, Spartalis S, et al. Do powered over-ground lower limb robotic exoskeletons affect outcomes in the rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(8):764–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannick MS, Beghi E, Blake N, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:459–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan C, Farris R. The futire promise of lower limb robotic exoskeletons. J Nurse Life Care Plan. 2015;15:854–859.
   Google Scholar
• Viteckova S, Kutilek P, Jirina M. Wearable lower limb robotics: a review. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2013;33:96–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PM R. 2017;9(1):46–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manns PJ, Hurd C, Yang JF. Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton C, Evans R, Shamley D, et al. Effectiveness of over-ground robotic locomotor training in improving walking performance, cardiovascular demands, secondary complications and user-satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injuries: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(10):723–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstenbach- Waelen A, Seelen HAM. Embracing change: practical and theoretical considerations for successful implementation of technology assisting upper limb training in stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:52–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J. Neurological rehabilitation: optimising motor performance. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, et al. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015;6(1):8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgey AS. Robotic exoskeletons: the current pros and cons. World J Orthop. 2018;9(9):112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrò R, Cacciola A, Bertè F, et al. Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? Neurol Sci. 2016;37(4):503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo AE, Maher JL, Baunsgaard CB, et al. Clinician-focused overview of bionic exoskeleton use after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23(3):234–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C-Y, Delgado AD, Weinrauch WJ, et al. Exoskeletal-assisted walking during acute inpatient rehabilitation leads to motor and functional improvement in persons with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(4):607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex Bionics. REX product information. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.rexbionics.com/product-information/
   Google Scholar
• ReWalk Robotics. ReWalk. 2019 [cited 2019 Sep 18]. Available from: https://rewalk.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pinto D, Garnier M, Barbas J, et al. Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI model systems. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17:4–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupal BS, Rafique S, Singla A, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons: research trends and regulatory guidelines in medical and non-medical applications. Int J Robot Syst. 2017;14:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, et al. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17:123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Pysklywec A, Chau L, et al. Therapists’ experience of training and implementing an exoskeleton in a rehabilitation Centre. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;44:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam MY, Tatla SK, Lohse KR, et al. Perceptions of technology and its use for therapeutic application for individuals with hemiparesis: findings from Adult and Pediatric Focus Groups. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;2(1):e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurse Health. 2000;23:334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Making Strides. The making strides experience: ReWalk exoskeleton. [cited 2020 June 3]. Available from: https://www.makingstrides.com.au
   Google Scholar
• ReWalk Robotics. Rewalk: Distribution and Point of Sale. [cited 2020 June 10]. Available from: https://rewalk.com/locations/mobility-solutions-centre-dunedin/
   Google Scholar
• Spinal Cord Injuries Australia. [cited 2020 Oct 28]. Available from: https://scia.org.au
   Google Scholar
• Spinal Cord Injuries Australia. Neuromoves: specialised exercise therapy for improved health, mobility and independence. [cited 2020 Oct 28]. Available from: https://scia.org.au/neuromoves-exercise/
   Google Scholar
• MS Research Australia. [cited 2020 Oct 28]. Available from: https://msra.org.au
   Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoom Video Communications Inc. About Zoom. [cited 2020 June 3]. Available from: https://zoom.us/about
   Google Scholar
• Fisher K. The qualitative interview and challenges for clinicians undertaking research: a personal reflection. Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(1):102–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. Nvivo. [cited 2020 June 3]. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/about/nvivo
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Jayaraman A, Mummidisetty CK, et al. Experience of robotic exoskeleton use at four spinal cord injury model systems centers. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(4):256–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen GK, Jorgensen V, Normann B. “Back at the same level as everyone else”-user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5(1):103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, et al. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:208–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D, Holloway CS, Morgado Ramirez DZ, et al. What are user perspectives of exoskeleton technology? A literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(2):160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz H, Patzer D, Galen SS. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: promises, pitfalls, and opportunities. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):560–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar