Providing evidence for content validity of the most frequently used hip specific recovery outcome measures in hip fracture studies: an International Classification of Functioning approach

References

• Sing CW, Lin TC, Bartholomew S, et al. Global epidemiology of hip fractures: a study protocol using a common analytical platform among multiple countries. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e047258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant DM, Sanders DW, Coles CP, et al. Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(6):434–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, et al . Physical rehabilitation outcome measures : a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner D, Norman GR, Cairney J, et al. Health measurement scales : a practical guide to their development and use [internet]. 5th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2011 May 24]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25(5):508–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2011 May 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Moriello C, Asano M, et al. The extent to which common health-related quality of life indices capture constructs beyond symptoms and function. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(5):621–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1225–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, et al. Comparing the content of participation instruments using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. 2002. Available from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borchers M, Cieza A, Sigl T, et al. Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Clin Rheumatol. 2005;24(2):139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang-Kim A, Schemitsch E, Kulkarni AV, et al. Methodological challenges in the use of hip-specific composite outcomes: linking measurements from hip fracture trials to the international classification of functioning, disability and health framework. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):219–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang-Kim A, Beaton D, Bhandari M, et al. The need to standardize functional outcome in randomized trials of hip fracture: a review using the ICF framework. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(1):e1–e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, et al. Refinements of the ICF linking rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):574–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF browser [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing outcomes in rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty capture issues relevant to patients? Results of a systematic review and ICF linking process. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(5):374–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschiesner U, Rogers SN, Harreus U, et al. Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(6):627–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) core sets for rheumatoid arthritis: a way to specify functioning. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;2(Suppl 2):ii40–ii45.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood KL, Griffin XL, Achten J, et al. Developing a core outcome set for hip fracture trials. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1016–1023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andresen EM, Lollar DJ, Meyers AR. Disability outcomes research: why this supplement, on this topic, at this time? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S1–S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12 Suppl 2):S10–S14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett DJ, Chiarello LA, McCoy SW, et al. The move & PLAY study: an example of comprehensive rehabilitation outcomes research. Phys Ther. 2010;90(11):1660–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaul E, Barron J, Rosenzweig JP, et al. An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musich S, Wang SS, Ruiz J, et al. The impact of mobility limitations on health outcomes among older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(2):162–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison SR, Magaziner J, McLaughlin MA, et al. The impact of post-operative pain on outcomes following hip fracture. Pain. 2003;103(3):303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagel S, Lindqvist E, Petersson IF, et al. Validation of outcome measurement instruments used in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention for patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis: linking of the international classification of functioning, disability and health, construct validity and responsiveness to change. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(5):411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J, et al. The role of environment in the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11–12):588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara I, Vrotsou K, Orive M, et al. Factors related to functional prognosis in elderly patients after accidental hip fractures: a prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Halligan PW. The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):995–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan RH, Bell JW, Samuel LT, et al. Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142(8):1753–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards PK, Queen RM, Butler RJ, et al. Are range of motion measurements needed when calculating the Harris Hip Score? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):815–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Stucki G. The international classification of functioning disability and health: its development process and content validity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmen E, Zarzar K, Kamble S. The correlation between patient report outcomes and clinician reported outcomes. Value Health. 2013;16(3):A43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdravkovic A, Grote V, Pirchl M, et al. Comparison of patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures in lower back rehabilitation: introducing a new integrated performance measure (t2D). Qual Life Res. 2022;31(1):303–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bily W, Jauker J, Nics H, et al. Associations between patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in patients after traumatic injuries of the lower limb. IJERPH. 2022;19(5):3140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, et al. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:48–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballert CS, Hopfe M, Kus S, et al. Using the refined ICF linking rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):584–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanigan D, Everhart J, Glassman A. Psychological factors affecting rehabilitation and outcomes following elective orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(9):563–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm ES, Resnick B, Orwig D, et al. Exploration of informal caregiving following hip fracture. Geriatr Nurs. 2010;31(4):254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar