Wearable sensor-based measures of step-up transfers are supplementary to patient-reported outcome measures following total joint arthroplasty

References

• Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens-Lapsley JE, Schenkman ML, Dayton MR. Comparison of self-reported knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score to performance measures in patients after total knee arthroplasty. Pm R. 2011;3(6):541–549; quiz 549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1331–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(9):1145–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabinger C, Geissler A. Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22(6):734–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabinger C, Lothaller H, Geissler A. Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23(10):1664–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(10):2606–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(9):1134–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, et al. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna IE, Kehlet H, Wede HR, et al. Objectively measured early physical activity after total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33(3):509–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JAN, et al. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(4):576–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varacallo M, Chakravarty R, Denehy K, et al. Joint perception and patient perceived satisfaction after total hip and knee arthroplasty in the American population. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):495–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylde V, Bertram W, Sanderson E, et al. The STAR care pathway for patients with pain at 3 months after total knee replacement: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022;4:188–197.
   Google Scholar
• Smith TO, Hawker GA, Hunter DJ, et al. The OMERACT-OARSI core domain set for measurement in clinical trials of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(8):981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;146(3):435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris K, Dawson J, Gibbons E, et al. Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;7:101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowsey MM, Choong PFM. The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery. Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, van der Slikke RMA, van Lummel RC, et al. Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(7):724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolink SAAN, Grimm B, Heyligers IC. Patient-reported outcome measures versus inertial performance-based outcome measures: a prospective study in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):618–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(8):1042–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugade V, Wu A, Jewett B, et al. Gait asymmetry following an anterior and anterolateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech . 2010;25(7):675–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornetti P, Maillefert JF, Laroche D, et al. Gait analysis as a quantifiable outcome measure in hip or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Jt Be Spine. 2010;77(5):421–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, et al. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):123–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer R, Lanting B, Marsh J, et al. Postoperative gait mechanics after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(11):e1–e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader MW, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky MC, et al. Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(6):1476–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth MH, Stilling M, Lorenzen ND, et al. Block-step asymmetry 5 years after large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty is related to lower muscle mass and leg power on the implant side. Clin Biomech . 2014;29(6):684–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra MC, Schreurs BW, Verdonschot N. The sit-to-stand movement: differences in performance between patients after primary total hip arthroplasty and revision total hip arthroplasty with acetabular bone impaction grafting. Phys Ther. 2011;91(4):547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolink SAAN, van Laarhoven SN, Lipperts M, et al. Inertial sensor motion analysis of gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: differentiating knee patients from healthy controls. Physiol Meas. 2012;33(11):1947–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom AW, Artz N, Beswick AD, et al. Improving patients’ experience and outcome of total joint replacement: the RESTORE programme. Programme Grants Appl Res. 2016;4(12):1–508.
   Google Scholar
• Wylde V, Blom AW, Bolink S, et al. Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unnanuntana A, Mait JE, Shaffer AD, et al. Performance-Based tests and Self-Reported questionnaires provide distinct information for the preoperative evaluation of total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(5):770–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolink SAAN, Naisas H, Senden R, et al. Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(3):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, et al. What is the minimum clinically important difference for the womac index after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2005–2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senden R, Grimm B, Meijer K, et al. The importance to including objective functional outcomes in the clinical follow up of total knee arthroplasty patients. Knee. 2011;18(5):306–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttl B. Measurement of individual differences: lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychol Sci. 2005;16(6):460–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhang Z, McArdle JJ, et al. Investigating ceiling effects in longitudinal data analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 2009;43(3):476–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain FS, Patel S, Fernandez MA, et al. A performance based patient outcome score for active patients following total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(1):51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolink SAAN, Lenguerrand E, Brunton LR, et al. Assessment of physical function following total hip arthroplasty: inertial sensor based gait analysis is supplementary to patient-reported outcome measures. Clin Biomech. 2016;32:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Clements KE, et al. Measuring functional improvement after total knee arthroplasty requires both performance-based and patient-report assessments. A longitudinal analysis of outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(5):728–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar