The safety, feasibility, and efficacy of an 18-week exercise intervention for adults with primary brain cancer – the BRACE study

References

• GBD 2016 Brain and Other CNS Cancer Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other CNS cancer, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(4):376–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Brain and other Central nervous system cancers. Canberra: AIHW; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Cancer in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sterckx W, Coolbrandt A, de Casterlé BD, et al. The impact of a high-grade glioma on everyday life: a systematic review from the patient’s and caregiver’s perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(1):107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandana SR, Movva S, Arora M, et al. Primary brain tumors in adults. American Family Physician. 2008;77(10):1423–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(11):2375–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenreich CM, Stone CR, Cheung WY, et al. Physical activity and mortality in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020;4(1):pkz080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Newton RU, Spence RR, et al. The exercise and sports science Australia position statement: exercise medicine in cancer management. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(11):1175–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Spence RR, Hayes SC. Is exercise really safe, feasible, and effective for all people diagnosed with cancer? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2022;18(1):156–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler CX, Matsuyama M, Jones TL, et al. Physical activity and exercise in adults diagnosed with primary brain cancer: a systematic review. J Neurooncol. 2021;153(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence RR, Sandler CX, Newton RU, et al. Physical activity and exercise guidelines for people with cancer: why are they needed, who should use them, and when? Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(5):151075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown WJ, Bauman AE, Bull F, et al. Development of Evidence-based Physical Activity Recommendations for Adults (18–64 years). Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Health, August 2012 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Spence RR, Galvão DA, et al. Australian association for exercise and sport science position stand: optimising cancer outcomes through exercise. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(4):428–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Spence RR, Sandler CX, Singh B, et al. A randomised, comparative, effectiveness trial evaluating low- versus high-level supervision of an exercise intervention for women with breast cancer: the SAFE trial. Cancers. 2022;14(6):1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton K, Norton L. Pre-exercise screening. Guide to the Australian adult pre-exercise screening system exercise and sports science Australia. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzner MA, Meyers CA, Gelke CK, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors. Cancer. 1995;75(5):1151–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, et al. General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):192–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, et al. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;13(2):63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhan MA, Frey M, Büchi S, et al. The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985; 10(3):141–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, et al. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(7):631–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994;49(2):M85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cella D, Eton DT, Lai J-S, et al. Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002; 24(6):547–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasekaba T, Lee AL, Naughton MT. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Internal Medicine Journal. 2009 2009/08/01;39(8):495-501.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Wei S, Shi Y, et al. The dose-response effect of physical activity on cancer mortality: findings from 71 prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(6):339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan JA, Cella D, Hays RD. Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(12):1217–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capozzi LC, Boldt KR, Easaw J, et al. Evaluating a 12-week exercise program for brain cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2016;25(3):354–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence RR, Sandler CX, Jones TL, et al. Practical suggestions for harms reporting in exercise oncology: the exercise harms reporting method (ExHaRM). BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e067998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen SN, Lahart IM, Thomsen LM, et al. Harms of exercise training in patients with cancer undergoing systemic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished controlled trials. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;59:101937.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh B, Hayes SC, Spence RR, et al. Exercise and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise safety, feasibility and effectiveness. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Spence RR, Steele ML, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety, feasibility, and effect of exercise in women with stage II + breast cancer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(12):2621–2636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayotte SL, Harro CC. Effects of an individualized aerobic exercise program in individuals with a brain tumor undergoing inpatient rehabilitation [article.] Rehabilitation Oncology. 2017;35(4):163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring K, Kloek CJ, Aaronson NK, et al. Feasibility of a home-based exercise intervention with remote guidance for patients with stable grade II and III gliomas: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(3):352–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen A, Søgaard K, Minet LR. Development of an exercise intervention as part of rehabilitation in a glioblastoma multiforme survivor during irradiation treatment: a case report. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1608–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin GT, Greenwood KM, Singh F, et al. Exercise improves physical function and mental health of brain cancer survivors: two exploratory case studies. Integr Cancer Ther. 2016;15(2):190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbury K, Liao Z, Shannon V, et al. Dyadic yoga program for patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy and their family caregivers: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2019;28(3):615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbury K, Mallaiah S, Mahajan A, et al. Yoga program for high-grade glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy and their family caregivers. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018; 17(2):332–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin EG, Hayes SC, Haas MR, et al. Healthy living after cancer: a dissemination and implementation study evaluating a telephone-delivered healthy lifestyle program for cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin EG, Lawler SP, Winkler EA, et al. A randomized trial of a telephone-delivered exercise intervention for non-urban dwelling women newly diagnosed with breast cancer: exercise for health. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 43(2):229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Rye S, DiSipio T, et al. Exercise for health: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a pragmatic, translational exercise intervention on the quality of life, function and treatment-related side effects following breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):175–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson C, Bacon R, Dwyer R, et al. The role of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic across the interdisciplinary cancer team: implications for practice. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020;36(6):151090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, et al. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amireault S, Godin G. The Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire: validity evidence supporting its use for classifying healthy adults into active and insufficiently active categories. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;120(2):604–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, et al. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(9):556–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, et al. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. J Aging Health. 2012;24(5):863–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar