Developing multidimensional participation profiles after traumatic brain injury: a TBI model systems study

References

• Nagi SZ. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976;54(4):439–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, 5th ed. 2016. World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/246208
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Workshop on Disability in America: A New Look: Summary and Background Papers. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/read/11579/chapter/5.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. 2002. [cited 2020 December 14]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health. : ICF. World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; November90(11 Suppl):S22–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang F-H, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA. Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; April 194(4):771–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers MPJM, Gordon WA, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004; December19(6):459–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, et al. Development of the participation assessment with recombined tools-objective for use after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; April92(4):542–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Clark A, Pappadis MR. What is community integration anyway?: defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 April;25(2):121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseotto MC, Morris PG, Gillespie DC, et al. Post-traumatic growth and value-directed living after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022;32(1):84–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pais Hons C, Ponsford JL, Gould KR, et al. Role of valued living and associations with functional outcome following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019; 29(4):625–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper K, Visser-Meily JMA, Hendrikx A, et al. Participation of people with acquired brain injury: Insiders perspectives. Brain Inj. 2011;25(9):832–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Carlson P, Johnston J, et al. The definition of community integration: perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Inj. 1998; 12(1):15–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Pappadis MR, Davis LC, et al. Relationship of race/ethnicity and income to community integration following traumatic brain injury: investigation in a non-rehabilitation trauma sample. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(1):15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(2):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala C, Waterhouse C, Evans E, et al. Conceptualization of participation: a qualitative synthesis of brain injury stakeholder perspectives. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3:908615.
   Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Pappadis MR, Clark AN, et al. Perceptions of community integration in an ethnically diverse sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011; 26(2):158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juengst SB, Erler KS, Neumann D, et al. Participation importance and satisfaction across the lifespan: a traumatic brain injury model systems study. Rehabil Psychol. 2022;67(3):344–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Magasi S, Bode RK, et al. Measuring enfranchisement: Importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(11):2157–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Lai J-S, Magasi S, et al. Measuring participation enfranchisement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(4):564–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersey J, McCue M, Skidmore E. Domains and dimensions of community participation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2020 May 11;34(6):708–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis KA, Evans MB, Mortenson WB, et al. Broadening the conceptualization of participation of persons with physical disabilities: a configurative review and recommendations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(2):395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erler KS, Whiteneck GG, Juengst SB, et al. Predicting the trajectory of participation after traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal analysis. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 August;33(4):257–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C, et al. US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(6):E1-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeier JP, Hammond FM, O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, et al. Refining understanding of life satisfaction in elderly persons with traumatic brain injury using age-defined cohorts: a TBI model systems study. Brain Inj. 2021; 35(10):1284–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehi Aroogh M, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F. Social participation of older adults: a concept analysis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2020; 8:55–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dizon L, Wiles J, Peiris-John R. What is meaningful participation for older people? An analysis of aging policies. Gerontologist. 2020; 60(3):396–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascialino G, Hirshson C, Egan M, et al. Objective and subjective assessment of long-term community integration in minority groups following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;24(1):29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Chiaravalloti ND, Sander AM, et al. The community integration questionnaire: factor structure across racial/ethnic groups in persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013; 28(6):E14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lygnegård F, Almqvist L, Granlund M, et al. Participation profiles in domestic life and peer relations as experienced by adolescents with and without impairments and long-term health conditions. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019; 22(1):27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar PCM, Campbell CG. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(2):112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP, Marwitz JH, Harrison-Felix C. Thirty years of national institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems center Research-An update. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018; 33(6):363–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Program. Traumatic brain injury model systems national database. 2022. [ cited 1 May 2022]. Available from http://www.tbindsc.org.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 May;74(5):531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E. Understanding scores on the satisfaction with life scale 2006. February 13 [cited 2014 February 9]. Available from: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/∼ediener/Documents/Understanding%20SWLS%20Scores.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49(1):71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M, Cicerone KD, Heinemann A, et al. Poster 89: PART-S: a new measure of satisfaction with participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):e39.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner JA, Whiteneck GG, Corrigan JD, et al. Comparison of scoring methods for the participation assessment with recombined tools-objective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(4):552–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner J, Bellon K, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, et al. Participation assessment with recombined tools-objective (PART-O). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013; 28(4):337–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Hammel J, Heinemann A, et al. Participation: a comparative analysis of multiple rehabilitation stakeholders’ perspectives. J Rehabil Med. 2009; 41(11):936–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang F-H, Chang K-H, Liou T-H, et al. Validation of the participation measure–3 domains, 4 dimensions (PM-3D4D). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(12):2498–2506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins L, Lanza S. Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6:461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2007;14(4):535–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Y, Mendell NR, Rubin DB. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika. 2001; 88(3):767–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn K. Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In The oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Vol. 2. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 551–611.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: using the BCH method in mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model.: 80. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Residual associations in latent class and latent transition analysis. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2015; 22(2):169–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anon. Structural equation modeling: applications using Mplus, 2nd Edition | Wiley. Wiley.com [Internet]. [cited 2022. February 16]. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Structural+Equation+Modeling%3A+Applications+Using+Mplus%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119422723.
   Google Scholar
• Mair P. Modern psychometrics with R. Available from: https://pdfcoffee.com/modern-psychometrics-with-r-patrick-mair-1-pdf-free.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brasure M, Lamberty GJ, Sayer NA, et al. Multidisciplinary postacute rehabilitation for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK98993/
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Vuolo M, Bogner J, et al. Do state supports for persons with brain injury affect outcomes in the 5 years following acute rehabilitation? Health Place. 2021; 72:102674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arango-Lasprilla JC, Kreutzer JS. Racial and ethnic disparities in functional, psychosocial, and neurobehavioral outcomes after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(2):128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asemota AO, George BP, Cumpsty-Fowler CJ, et al. Race and insurance disparities in discharge to rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013; 30(24):2057–2065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arango-Lasprilla JC, Ketchum JM, Lewis AN, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in employment outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal investigation 1-5 years after injury. Pm R. 2011; 3(12):1083–1091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao S, Kumar RG, Wisniewski S, et al. Disparities in health care utilization of adults with traumatic brain injuries are related to insurance, race and ethnicity: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(3):E40–E50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Cardoso E, Romero MG, Chan F, et al. Disparities in vocational rehabilitation services and outcomes for hispanic clients with traumatic brain injury: do they exist? J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007; 22(2):85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadi A, Bannon S, Watson E, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities associated with traumatic brain injury across the continuum of care: a narrative review and directions for future research. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9(3):786–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taubert A, Giacino J, Bergin M, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in participation after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101(11):e83.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin PB, Krch D, Sutter M, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in mental health over the first two years after traumatic brain injury: a model systems study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(12):2288–2295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frier A, Barnett F, Devine S. The relationship between social determinants of health, and rehabilitation of neurological conditions: a systematic literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(10):941–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalbers MB. ‘When the banks withdraw, slum landlords take over’ : the structuration of neighbourhood decline through redlining, drug dealing, speculation and immigrant exploitation. Urban Stud. 2006; 43(7):1061–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009; 24(3):195–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AD, Hassen N, Craig-Neil A. Employment interventions in health settings: a systematic review and synthesis. Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(5):447–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersey J, Terhorst L, Heinemann AW, et al. Construct validity of the enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators. Clin Rehabil. 2022; 36(2):263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersey J, Terhorst L, Hammel J, et al. Detecting change in community participation with the enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators. Clin Rehabil. 2022; 36(2):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar