167
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Six-month outcomes and patterns of recovery for people with lateropulsion following stroke

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2405-2413 | Received 19 Sep 2022, Accepted 02 Jun 2023, Published online: 13 Jun 2023

References

  • Karnath H, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000;55(9):1298–1304. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.9.1298.
  • Pérennou D, Amblard B, Laassel M, et al. Understanding the pusher behaviour of some stroke patients with spatial deficits: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(4):570–575. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.31198.
  • Pérennou D, Mazibrada G, Chauvineau V, et al. Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship? Brain. 2008;131(Pt 9):2401–2413. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn170.
  • Dai S, Piscicelli C, Clarac E, et al. Lateropulsion after hemispheric stroke: a form of spatial neglect. Neurology. 2021;96(17):e2160–e2171. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011826.
  • Abe H, Kondo T, Oouchida Y, et al. Prevalence and length of recovery of pusher syndrome based on cerebral hemispheric lesion side in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1654–1656. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.638379.
  • Dai S, Lemaire C, Piscicelli C, et al. Lateropulsion prevalence after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2022;98(15):e1574–e1584. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200010.
  • Pedersen P, Wandel A, Jorgensen H, et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(1):25–28. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90215-4.
  • Baccini M, Paci M, Nannetti L, et al. Scale for contraversive pushing: cutoff scores for diagnosing “pusher behavior” and construct validity. Phys Ther. 2008;88(8):947–955. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070179.
  • Clark E, Hill K, Punt T. Responsiveness of 2 scales to evaluate lateropulsion or pusher syndrome recovery after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1):149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.017.
  • Krewer C, Luther M, Müller F, et al. Time course and influence of pusher behavior on outcome in a rehabilitation setting: a prospective cohort study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(4):331–339. doi: 10.1310/tsr2004-331.
  • Danells C, Black S, Gladstone D, et al. Poststroke “pushing”: natural history and relationship to motor and functional recovery. Stroke. 2004;35(12):2873–2878. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000147724.83468.18.
  • Nolan J, Godecke E, Spilsbury K, et al. Post-stroke lateropulsion and rehabilitation outcomes: a retrospective analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(18):5162–5170.
  • Babyar S, White H, Shafi N, et al. Outcomes with stroke and lateropulsion: a case-matched controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(4):415–423. doi: 10.1177/1545968307313511.
  • Babyar S, Peterson G, Reding M. Time to recovery from lateropulsion dependent on key stroke deficits: a retrospective analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(3):207–213. doi: 10.1177/1545968314541330.
  • Babyar S, Peterson G, Reding M. Case-control study of impairments associated with recovery from “pusher syndrome” after stroke: logistic regression analyses. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(1):25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.08.024.
  • Karnath H, Johannsen L, Broetz D, et al. Prognosis of contraversive pushing. J Neurol. 2002;249(9):1250–1253. doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0824-z.
  • Barra J, Oujamaa L, Chauvineau V, et al. Asymmetric standing posture after stroke is related to a biased egocentric coordinate system. Neurology. 2009;72(18):1582–1587. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a4123a.
  • Birnbaum M, Brock K, Clark R, et al. Standing weight-bearing asymmetry in adults with lateropulsion following stroke. Gait Posture. 2021;90:427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.172.
  • Mansfield A, Danells C, Zettel J, et al. Determinants and consequences for standing balance of spontaneous weight-bearing on the paretic side among individuals with chronic stroke. Gait Posture. 2013;38(3):428–432. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.005.
  • Pereira L, Botelho A, Martins E. Relationships between body symmetry during weight-bearing and functional reach among chronic hemiparetic patients. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(3):229–266.
  • de Haart M, Geurts A, Huidekoper S, et al. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(6):886–895.
  • Babyar S, Peterson M, Bohannon R, et al. Clinical examination tools for lateropulsion or pusher syndrome following stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(7):639–650. doi: 10.1177/0269215509104172.
  • Chow E, Parkinson S, Jenkin J, et al. Reliability and validity of the four-point pusher score: an assessment tool for measuring lateropulsion and pusher behaviour in adults after stroke. Physiother Can. 2019;71(1):34–42. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2017-69.
  • Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, et al. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired: reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64(1):35–40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.
  • D’Aquila M, Smith T, Organ D, et al. Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(1):102–109. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr709oa.
  • Birnbaum M, Brock K, Parkinson S, et al. Rasch analysis of the burke lateropulsion scale (BLS). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021;28(4):268–275. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1824724.
  • Benaim C, Pérennou D, Villy J, et al. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the postural assessment scale for stroke patients (PASS). Stroke. 1999;30(9):1862–1868. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.9.1862.
  • Mao H, Hsueh I, Tang P, et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1022–1027. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000012516.63191.c5.
  • Linacre J, Heinemann A, Wright B, et al. The structure and stablity of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):127–132. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90384-0.
  • Fielder R. Article III – The Rasch measurement model. UDS Med Res Update. 1993;7(1):1–2.
  • Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinée S. Reliability of scores on the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (STREAM) measures. Phys Ther. 1999;79(1):8–23. doi: 10.1093/ptj/79.1.8.
  • Fugl-Meyer A, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. JRM. 1975;7(1):13–31. doi: 10.2340/1650197771331.
  • Azouvi P, Marchal F, Samuel C, et al. Functional consequences and awareness of unilateral neglect: study of an evaluation scale. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996;6(2):133–150. doi: 10.1080/713755501.
  • Smith PM, Illig SB, Fiedler RC, et al. Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the functional independence measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(5):431–435. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90029-5.
  • Mukaka MM. A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.
  • Lin J, Hsieh C, Lo S, et al. Prediction of functional outcomes in stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2003;102(10):695–700.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.