1,550
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

An assessment of the content and properties of extended and instrumental activities of daily living scales: a systematic review

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1990-1999 | Received 09 Jan 2023, Accepted 27 May 2023, Published online: 06 Jul 2023

References

  • Mirzadeh FS, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Sharifi F, et al. Validity and reliability: the Iranian version of Lawton IADL in elderly community dwellers. JPMH. 2020;19(3):241–250. doi: 10.1108/JPMH-05-2020-0036.
  • Fried TR, Tinetti ME, Iannone L, et al. Health outcome prioritization as a tool for decision making among older persons with multiple chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(20):1856–1858. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.424.
  • Edemekong PF, Bomgaars DL, Sukumaran S, et al. Activities of daily living. Encycl Neurol Sci [Internet]. 2022. 47–8.
  • Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.
  • Wicklund AH, Johnson N, Rademaker A, et al. Profiles of decline in activities of daily living in non-Alzheimer dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21(1):8–13. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3180324549.
  • Tozlu M, Cankurtaran M, Yavuz BB, et al. Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: a validation study of the Turkish version of the disability assessment for dementia scale. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014;(4):237–246. doi: 10.1177/0891988714532014.
  • Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations. World population ageing. 2019. P. 1–64.
  • Asunta P, Viholainen H, Ahonen T, et al. Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):1–13.
  • Sikkes SAM, De Lange-De Klerk ESM, Pijnenburg YAL, et al. A systematic review of instrumental activities of daily living scales in dementia: room for improvement. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(1):7–12. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.155838.
  • Mokkink Cecilia AC, Prinsen Donald L, Patrick Jordi Alonso Lex M, et al. COSMIN manual for systematic reviews of PROMs COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual. 2018. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: www.cosmin.nl.
  • Mokkink LB, De Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient‐reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
  • Johnson G. Measurement scales used in elderly care abhaya gupta radcliffe measurement scales used in elderly care £24.95 168pp 9781846192661 1846192668. Nurs Older People. 2009;21(10):10–10. doi: 10.7748/nop.21.10.10.s9.
  • McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the Kappa statistic. Biochem Medica. 2012;22(3):276.
  • Garin O. Ceiling effect. Encycl Qual Life Well-Being Res. 2014;31:631–633.
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;3:n71.
  • Johnson N, Barion A, Rademaker A, et al. The activities of daily living questionnaire: a validation study in patients with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18(4):223–230.
  • Erzigkeit H, Lehfeld H, Peña-Casanova J, et al. The Bayer-activities of daily living scale (B-ADL): results from a validation study in three European countries. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2001;12(5):348–358. doi: 10.1159/000051280.
  • Cole MG. Interrater reliability of the blessed dementia scale. Can J Psychiatry. 1990;35(4):328–330.
  • Bucks RS, Ashworth DL, Wilcock GK, et al. Assessment of activities of daily living in dementia: development of the Bristol activities of daily living scale. Age Ageing. 1996;25(2):113–120. doi: 10.1093/ageing/25.2.113.
  • Patterson MB, Mack JL. Cleveland scale for activities of daily living (CSADL): its reliability and validity. J Clin Geropsychology. 2001;7(1):15–28.
  • Gelinas I, Gauthier L, McIntyre M. Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: the disability assessment for dementia. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(2):471–481.
  • Böhm P, Peña-Casanova J, Aguilar M, et al. Clinical validity and utility of the interview for deterioration of daily living in dementia for Spanish-speaking communities NORMACODEM group. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998;10(3):261–270.
  • Tong AYC, Man DWK. The validation of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale for institutionalized elderly persons OTJR: occupation, participation and health. 2002
  • Siriwardhana DD, Walters K, Rait G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the sinhala version of lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199820.
  • Isik EI, Yilmaz S, Uysal I, et al. Adaptation of the lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale to turkish: validity and reliability study. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020;24(1):35–40. doi: 10.4235/agmr.19.0051.
  • Hassani Mehraban A, Soltanmohamadi Y, Akbarfahimi MT. Validity and reliability of the persian version of Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale in patients with dementia. J Islam Repub Iran. 2014;3(28):25.
  • Vergara I, Bilbao A, Orive M, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Lawton IADL scale for its application in elderly people. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-130.
  • Ng TP, Niti M, Chiam PC, et al. Physical and cognitive domains of the instrumental activities of daily living: validation in a multiethnic population of asian older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(7):726–735. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.7.726.
  • Wang CY, Hu MH, Chen HY, et al. Self-reported mobility and instrumental activities of daily living: test-retest reliability and criterion validity. J Aging Phys Act. 2012;20(2):186–197. doi: 10.1123/japa.20.2.186.
  • Kadar M, Ibrahim S, Razaob NA, et al. Validity and reliability of a Malay version of the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale among the Malay speaking elderly in Malaysia. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65(1):63–68. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12441.
  • Chen HM, Lin HF, Huang MF, et al. Validation of Taiwan performance-based instrumental activities of daily living (TPIADL), a performance – based measurement of instrumental activities of daily living for patients with vascular cognitive impairment. PLoS One 2016;11(11):e0166546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166546.
  • Chuang IC, Hsu WC, Chen CL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of an ICF-Based instrumental activities of daily living assessment with older adults with cognitive decline. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(6):7406205050p1–7406205050p8.
  • Özkeskin M, Özden F, Şahin S. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the turkish version of the self-care ability scale for the elderly. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021;25(2):122–128. doi: 10.4235/agmr.21.0046.
  • Stringer G, Leroi I, Sikkes SAM, et al. Enhancing “meaningfulness” of functional assessments: UK adaptation of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire. Int Psychogeriatr. 2021; 33(1):39–50. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219001881.
  • Sikkes SAM, Knol DL, Pijnenburg YAL, et al. Validation of the Amsterdam IADL questionnaire, a new tool to measure instrumental activities of daily living in dementia. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41(1):35–41. doi: 10.1159/000346277.
  • Harwood RH, Ebrahim S, Harwood RH, et al. Disability and rehabilitation the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the nottingham extended activities of daily living scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. 2009. [cited 2022 Sep 2]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=idre20.
  • Chen HM, Yeh YC, Su WL, et al. Development and validation of a new performance-based measurement of instrumental activities of daily living in Taiwan. Psychogeriatrics. 2015; 15(4):227–234. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12096.
  • Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226–1232.
  • Hokoishi K, Ikeda M, Maki N, Nomura M, Torikawa S, Fujimoto N, Fukuhara R, Komori K, Tanabe H. Interrater reliability of the physical self-maintenance scale and the instrumental activities of daily living scale in a variety of health professional representatives. Aging Ment Health. 2001;5(1):38–40.
  • Pérez L, Antonio J, Menor J. Development and validation of a performance-based test to assess instrumental activities of daily living in Spanish older adults. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2018;34(6):386–398. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000352.
  • Hopman-Rock M, van Hirtum H, de Vreede P, et al. Activities of daily living in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(7):917–925. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-1034-6.
  • A guide for cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments in mental health [Internet]. [cited 2022 Sep 6]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285334108_A_guide_for_cross-cultural_validation_of_measurement_instruments_in_mental_health.