Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a mixed-methods systematic review

References

• 2016 Global Burden of Disease Study Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1211–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen M, Madhavan T, Bell J. Combined analysis of 3 cross-sectional surveys of pain in 14 countries in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and Asia: impact on physical and emotional aspects and quality of life. Scand J Pain. 2020; 20(3):575–589. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Tallawy SN, Nalamasu R, Salem GI, et al. Management of musculoskeletal pain: an update with emphasis on chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Ther. 2021; 10(1):181–209. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00235-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin I, Wiles L, Waller R, et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(2):79–86. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadro J, O’Keeffe M, Maher C. Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e032329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham J, Doyle F, Ryan JM, et al. Primary care-based models of care for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol. HRB Open Res. 2021;4:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13260.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Østerås N, Moseng T, van Bodegom-Vos L, et al. Implementing a structured model for osteoarthritis care in primary healthcare: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. PLOS Med. 2019;16(10):e1002949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzat AM, Esculier J-F, Ferguson SL, et al. Canadian physiotherapists integrate virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy Canada. 2022;:e20220092. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2022-0092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk M, Rudel D, R R. Definitions of terms in telehealth. Informatica Medica Slovenica. 2011;16:28–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes LG, Devan H, Fioratti I, et al. At my own pace, space, and place: a systematic review of qualitative studies of enablers and barriers to telehealth interventions for people with chronic pain. Pain. 2022; 163(2):e165–e181. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, et al. Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Phys Ther. 2020;100(8):1260–1264. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostini M, Moja L, Banzi R, et al. Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015; 21(4):202–213. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15572201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP, et al. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(5):625–638. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malliaras P, Merolli M, Williams CM, et al. It’s not hands-on therapy, so it’s very limited’: telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;52:102340. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton CJ, Ezzat AM, Merolli M, et al. It’s second best": a mixed-methods evaluation of the experiences and attitudes of people with musculoskeletal pain towards physiotherapist delivered telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;58:102500–102500. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede SN, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Vliet Vlieland TP, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with non-Surgical treatment use for osteoarthritis patients in orthopaedic practice. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O’Leary SP, et al. Service provider perceptions of telerehabilitation as an additional service delivery option within an Australian neurosurgical and orthopaedic physiotherapy screening clinic: a qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(5):682–694. doi: 10.1177/1049732314528809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskins Z, Bullock L, Manning F, et al. Acceptability of, and preferences for, remote consulting during COVID-19 among older patients with two common long-term musculoskeletal conditions: findings from three qualitative studies and recommendations for practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05273-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O’Leary SP, et al. Patients are willing to use telehealth for the multidisciplinary management of chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional survey. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(7):445–452. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17706605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01478-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennell KL, Lawford BJ, Metcalf B, et al. Physiotherapists and patients report positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. J Physiother. 2021;67(3):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin J, Ahmad B, Amin S, et al. Rehabilitation professional and patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:7366063. doi: 10.1155/2022/7366063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluye P, Hong QN. Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):29–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Pluye P, Bujold M, et al. Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern C, Lizarondo L, Carrier J, et al. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2108–2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson A, White H, Bath-Hextall F, et al. A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2015;13(3):121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Shoesmith A, Hall A, Wolfenden L, et al. Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01134-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Barry Walsh C, Ezzat A, et al. Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review. HRB Open Res. 2022;5:37. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13551.1.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. PAIN. 2015;156(6):1003–1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Studies Checklist 2018. cited 2021 19/4/2021]. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
   Google Scholar
• Kanavaki AM, Rushton A, Efstathiou N, et al. Barriers and facilitators of physical activity in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(12):e017042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009; 9:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennell KL, Marshall CJ, Dobson F, et al. Does a Web-Based exercise programming system improve home exercise adherence for people with musculoskeletal conditions?: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(10):850–858. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Hinman RS. Consumer perceptions of and willingness to use remotely delivered service models for exercise management of knee and hip osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional survey. Arthritis Care Res . 2017;69(5):667–676. doi: 10.1002/acr.23122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Kasza J, et al. Physical therapists’ perceptions of telephone- and internet video-mediated service models for exercise management of people with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2018a;70(3):398–408. doi: 10.1002/acr.23260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranen K, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, et al. Toward patient-centered telerehabilitation design: understanding chronic pain patients’ preferences for web-based exercise telerehabilitation using a discrete choice experiment . J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen-Kosterink S, Huis In ‘t Veld R, Wever D, et al. Introducing remote physical rehabilitation for patients with chronic disorders by means of telemedicine. Health Technol. 2015; 5(2):83–90. doi: 10.1007/s12553-015-0111-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selter A, Tsangouri C, Ali SB, et al. An mHealth app for self-management of chronic lower back pain (limbr): pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(9):94–94.
   Google Scholar
• Smittenaar P, Erhart-Hledik JC, Kinsella R, et al. Translating comprehensive conservative care for chronic knee pain into a digital care pathway: 12-week and 6-month outcomes for the hinge health program. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong YK, Hui E, Woo J. A community-based exercise programme for older persons with knee pain using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(6):310–315. doi: 10.1258/1357633054893346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayaka T, Nakandala P, Sanjeewa C. Physiotherapists’ perceptions and barriers to use of telerehabilitation for exercise management of people with knee osteoarthritis in Sri Lanka. Disability and Rehabilitation: assistive Technology. 2022;12:1–10. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2122606.
   Google Scholar
• Fioratti I, Miyamoto GC, Fandim VJ, et al. Feasibility, usability, and implementation context of an internet-based pain education and exercise program for chronic musculoskeletal pain: pilot trial of the ReabilitaDOR program JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(8):e35743. doi: 10.2196/35743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özden F, Sarı Z, Karaman ÖN, et al. The effect of video exercise-based telerehabilitation on clinical outcomes, expectation, satisfaction, and motivation in patients with chronic low back pain. Ir J Med Sci. 2022;191(3):1229–1239. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02727-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tore NG, Oskay D, Haznedaroglu S. The quality of physiotherapy and rehabilitation program and the effect of telerehabilitation on patients with knee osteoarthritis . Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42(3):903–915. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06417-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arensman R, Kloek C, Pisters M, et al. Patient perspectives on using a smartphone app to support home-based exercise during physical therapy treatment: qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(3):e35316. doi: 10.2196/35316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cranen K, Drossaert CHC, Brinkman ES, et al. An exploration of chronic pain patients’ perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect. 2012;15(4):339–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00668.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronström A, Dahlberg LE, Nero H, et al. I would never have done it if it hadn’t been digital’: a qualitative study on patients’ experiences of a digital management programme for hip and knee osteoarthritis in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e028388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinman RS, Nelligan RK, Bennell KL, et al. Sounds a bit crazy, but it was almost more personal: a qualitative study of patient and clinician experiences of physical therapist-prescribed exercise for knee osteoarthritis via skype. Arthritis Care Res. 2017;69(12):1834–1844. doi: 10.1002/acr.23218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL, et al. “I was really sceptical…but it worked really well”: a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018b;26(6):741–750. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty AWA, Roberts LC, Stanford R, et al. Exploring patients’ experiences of internet-based self-management support for low back pain in primary care. Pain Med. 2020; 21(9):1806–1817. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasani F, Malliaras P, Haines T, et al. Telehealth sounds a bit challenging, but it has potential: participant and physiotherapist experiences of gym-based exercise intervention for achilles tendinopathy monitored via telehealth. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03907-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tilburg M, Kloek C, Staal JB, et al. Feasibility of a stratified blended physiotherapy intervention for patients with non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(2):286–298. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1756015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel KV, Hoffman EV, Phelan EA, et al. Remotely delivered exercise to rural older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022;4(8):735–744. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kloek CJJ, Bossen D, de Vries HJ, et al. Physiotherapists’ experiences with a blended osteoarthritis intervention: a mixed methods study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(5):572–579. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1489926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann ZK, Eberman LE, Games KE. Telemedicine experiences of athletic trainers and orthopaedic physicians for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. J Athl Train. 2020; 55(8):768–779. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-388-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry H, Nadeem S, Mundi R. How satisfied are patients and surgeons with telemedicine in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(1):47–56. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenforde AS, Iaccarino MA, Borgstrom H, et al. Telemedicine during COVID-19 for outpatient sports and musculoskeletal medicine physicians. Pm R. 2020; 12(9):926–932. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Åkesson KS, Sundén A, Hansson EE, et al. Experiences of osteoarthritis guidelines in primary health care – an interview study. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01611-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson J, Walsh N, Carter D, et al. Developing a web-based version of an exercise-based rehabilitation program for people with chronic knee and hip pain: a mixed methods study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(2):e67. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buabbas AJ, Albahrouh SE, Alrowayeh HN, et al. Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: patients and physical therapists’ experiences. Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(2):156–164. doi: 10.1159/000523775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthias MS, Evans E, Porter B, et al. Patients’ experiences with telecare for chronic pain and mood symptoms: a qualitative study. Pain Med. 2020;21(10):2137–2145. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, et al. The patient’s perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(9):3998–4011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10093998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T, Hartley N, Gillespie N. Service provider’s experiences of service separation: the case of telehealth. J Serv Res. 2016;19(4):477–494. doi: 10.1177/1094670516666674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(1):4–12. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16674087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar