Professional reintegration among professionally active Portuguese stroke survivors: a multicentric study

References

• GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-​4422​(21)​00252-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JD, Kapoor A, Linkewich E, et al. Return to work after young stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(3):243–256. doi: 10.1177/1747493017743059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett ML, Glozier N, Jan S, et al. Returning to paid employment after stroke: the psychosocial outcomes in stroke (POISE) cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kemp J, Kruithof WJ, Nijboer TCW, et al. Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(4):638–653. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1313746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Ramel E, Iwarsson S. Quality of life after stroke: well-being, life satisfaction, and subjective aspects of work. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12(2):89–95. doi: 10.1080/11038120510031770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel K, Wolfe CD, Busch MA, et al. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40(6):e431–e440. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.534487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strilciuc S, Grad DA, Radu C, et al. The economic burden of stroke: a systematic review of cost of illness studies. J Med Life. 2021;14(5):606–619. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, et al. Working after a stroke: survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–1869. doi: 10.1080/09638280601143356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):127–131. doi: 10.1080/16501970310010475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura A, Teixeira F, Amorim M, et al. A scoping review on studies about the quality of life of informal caregivers of stroke survivors. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(4):1013–1032. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02988-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrving B, Barrick J, Davalos A, et al. Action plan for stroke in Europe 2018-2030. Eur Stroke J. 2018;3(4):309–336. doi: 10.1177/2396987318808719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman AM, Mick Tyerman R. Vocational and occupational rehabilitation for people with brain injury. In: Wilson BA, Winegardner J, van Heugten CM, Ownsworth T, editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation: the international handbook. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p. 378–388.
   Google Scholar
• Burns SP, Schwartz JK, Scott SL, et al. Interdisciplinary approaches to facilitate return to driving and return to work in mild stroke: a position paper. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(11):2378–2388. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canhete Pereira RM, Monteiro I. Vocational rehabilitation and return to work: integrative review. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2019;17(3):441–455. doi: 10.5327/Z1679443520190350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dongen CH, Goossens PH, van Zee IE, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes of a vocational rehabilitation program for patients with acquired brain injury in the Netherlands. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):523–530. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9738-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl MJ, et al. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32–32. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hiltunen S, Putaala J, Haapaniemi E, et al. Long-term outcome after cerebral venous thrombosis: analysis of functional and vocational outcome, residual symptoms, and adverse events in 161 patients. J Neurol. 2016;263(3):477–484. doi: 10.1007/s00415-015-7996-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Toyonaga T, Hashimoto H. Functional and occupational characteristics associated with very early return to work after stroke in Japan. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(5):743–748. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntsiea MV, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, et al. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(7):663–673. doi: 10.1177/0269215514554241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L, Jusufovic M, et al. Ischaemic stroke at a young age is a serious event–final results of a population-based long-term follow-up in Western Norway. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20(5):818–823. doi: 10.1111/ene.12073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Toyonaga T, Hashimoto H. Functional and occupational characteristics predictive of a return to work within 18 months after stroke in Japan: implications for rehabilitation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(4):445–453. doi: 10.1007/s00420-013-0883-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner B, Pillai R, Sarma PS, et al. Factors predictive of return to work after stroke in patients with mild-moderate disability in India. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(3):548–553. Mardoi: 10.1111/ene.12887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bin Zainal MN, Pei Wen PK, Sien NY, et al. Supporting people with stroke to return to work in Singapore: findings from a pilot vocational rehabilitation program. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(6):7406205040p1–7406205040p9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.041376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz B, Claros-Salinas D, Streibelt M. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):28–44. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saúde D-GD. Acidente vascular cerebral: prescrição de medicina física e de reabilitação. Number 054/2011. Lisboa: Departamento de Qualidade da Saúde, Direção Geral da Saúde, 2011:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério do Trabalho, Solidariedade e Segurança Social. Regulamento da medida de qualificação de pessoas com deficiência e incapacidade. Diário Da República. 2015; 2.a série; N.° 147: 21182-(2)- 21182-(16).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch EA, Cadilhac DA, Luker JA, et al. Inequities in access to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: an international scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(8):619–626. Decdoi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1366010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempler I, Woitha K, Thielhorn U, et al. Post-stroke care after medical rehabilitation in Germany: a systematic literature review of the current provision of stroke patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3235-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–2089. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam M, Kostense PJ, Festen JM, et al. The relationship between hearing status and the participation in different categories of work: demographics. Work. 2013;46(2):207–219. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE). Classificação Portuguesa das Profissões: 2010. Lisboa: INE, 2011. Available from: https://www.ine.pt/xurl/pub/107961853
   Google Scholar
• Philp I, Brainin M, Walker MF, et al. Development of a poststroke checklist to standardize follow-up care for stroke survivors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22(7):e173–e180. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38(3):1091–1096. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo F, Pais-Ribeiro J, Oliveira A, et al. Validação do índice de barthel numa amostra de idosos não institucionalizados. Revista Portuguesa De Saúde Pública. 2007;25:59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Han J, Lee HI, Shin YI, et al. Factors influencing return to work after stroke: the Korean Stroke Cohort for Functioning and Rehabilitation (KOSCO) study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e028673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Johansson U, Ekbladh E, et al. Work potential and work performance during the first try-out of the person-centred return to work rehabilitation programme rework-stroke: a case study. Healthcare. 2020;8(4):454. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker-Cools BH, Daams JG, Wind H, et al. Effective return-to-work interventions after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):113–131. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1090014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, et al. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–340. doi: 10.1310/tsr1804-325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbari Ghoshchi S, De Angelis S, Morone G, et al. Return to work and quality of life after stroke in Italy: a study on the efficacy of technologically assisted neurorehabilitation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):5233–5345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YC, Kapellusch J, Garg A. Important factors influencing the return to work after stroke. Work. 2014;47(4):553–559. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brannigan C, Galvin R, Walsh ME, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with return to work after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(3):211–222. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1141242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glader EL, Jonsson B, Norrving B, et al. Socioeconomic factors’ effect on return to work after first stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(6):608–613. doi: 10.1111/ane.12639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmedo-Vega V, Aguilar-Idáñez MJ, Arenillas-Lara JF. [Comprehensive post-stroke rehabilitation: its long-term effects and the socio-environmental factors conditioning access to it]. Rev Neurol. 2021;73(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyldgård VB, Johnsen SP, Støvring H, et al. Socioeconomic status and acute stroke care: has the inequality gap been closed? Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:933–941. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S218322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer G, van Niekerk M. Vocational rehabilitation for young stroke survivors in Gauteng public healthcare: occupational therapists’ perceptions1. Work. 2021;69(1):91–107. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh ME, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(18):1599–1608. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.974834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank AO. Rehabilitation after critical illness: how to facilitate a successful return to work. BMJ. 2021;373:n1453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kobylańska M, Kowalska J, Neustein J, et al. The role of biopsychosocial factors in the rehabilitation process of individuals with a stroke. Work. 2018;61(4):523–535. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehnerer S, Hotter B, Padberg I, et al. Social work support and unmet social needs in life after stroke: a cross-sectional exploratory study. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1451-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padberg I, Knispel P, Zöllner S, et al. Social work after stroke: identifying demand for support by recording stroke patients’ and carers’ needs in different phases after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0626-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens E, Emmett E, Wang Y, et al. The Burden of Stroke in Europe: The challenge for policy makers. London: Stroke Alliance for Europe. 2017:1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Farinha Rodrigues C. Inequality and Poverty in Portugal: does location matters? SOCIOLOGIA ON LINE. 2019;19:15–32. doi: 10.30553/sociologiaonline.2019.19.1
   Google Scholar
• Brey JK, Wolf TJ. Socioeconomic disparities in work performance following mild stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(2):106–112. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.909535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pindus DM, Mullis R, Lim L, et al. Stroke survivors’ and informal caregivers’ experiences of primary care and community healthcare services – a systematic review and meta-ethnography. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XW, Shafei MN, Abdullah JM, et al. Reliability of telephone interview for assessment of long-term stroke outcomes: evidence from interrater analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(3-4):214–219. doi: 10.1159/000497238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Worrall L, Eames S, et al. Measuring outcomes in people who have had a stroke and their carers: can the telephone be used? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(2):119–127. doi: 10.1310/tsr1702-119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimonides S, Cavuoto MG, De Silva L, et al. The role of subjective cognitive complaints and depressive symptoms in social re-integration following stroke: a mediation explanation in a cross-sectional sample. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018; 25(7): 514–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abzhandadze T, Reinholdsson M, Palstam A, et al. Transforming self-reported outcomes from a stroke register to the modified rankin scale: a cross-sectional, explorative study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):17215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73082-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers MS, Pittman AC, Kendzerska T, et al. Self-reported sleep disturbances among people who have had a stroke: a cross-sectional analysis. Can Med Assoc J. 2023;195(10):e354–e362. 14doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Gavilan E, Montiel E, Baladas M, et al. Added value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after an acute stroke and early predictors of 90 days PROMs. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022;6(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00472-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lapin BR, Thompson NR, Schuster A, et al. Magnitude and variability of stroke patient-proxy disagreement across multiple health domains. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(3):440–447. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oczkowski C, O’Donnell M. Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;19(5):410–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapin BR, Thompson NR, Schuster A, et al. The validity of proxy responses on patient-reported outcome measures: are proxies a reliable alternative to stroke patients’ self-report? Qual Life Res. 2021;30(6):1735–1745. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02758-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar