“Wasting time”: a qualitative study of stroke survivors’ experiences of boredom in non-therapy time during inpatient rehabilitation

References

• Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(1):18–29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac D, Dalli L, Morrison J, et al. The Australian Stroke Clinical Registry Annual Report 2020. The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; December 2021, Report No. 13. p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management [Accessed 2022 September 7]. Available from: https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management
   Google Scholar
• Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014; 45(7):2053–2058. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016;62(4):182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittins M, Vail A, Bowen A, et al. Factors influencing the amount of therapy received during inpatient stroke care: an analysis of data from the UK Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(7):981–991. doi: 10.1177/0269215520927454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng XW, Brauer SG, Kuys SS, et al. Factors affecting the ability of the stroke survivor to drive their own recovery outside of therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:626538. doi: 10.1155/2014/626538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical, cognitive and social activity levels of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation within a mixed rehabilitation unit. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(1):91–101. doi: 10.1177/0269215512466252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenah K, Bernhardt J, Spratt NJ, et al. Depression and a lack of socialization are associated with high levels of boredom during stroke rehabilitation: an exploratory study using a new conceptual framework. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023;33(3):497–527. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2030761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun R, Goetz T, Daniels LM, et al. Boredom in achievement settings: exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. J Educ Psychol. 2010;102(3):531–549. doi: 10.1037/a0019243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgate EC, Wilson TD. Boring thoughts and bored minds: the MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Psychol Rev. 2018;25(5):689–713. doi: 10.1037/rev0000097.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell S, Scott P, Gustafsson L, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of occupation in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative exploration. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(13):1880–1885. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1542460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Middleton S, et al. Altering the rehabilitation environment to improve stroke survivor activity: a phase II trial. Int J Stroke. 2022;17(3):299–307. doi: 10.1177/17474930211006999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Bird ML, Luker J, et al. Stroke survivors’ perceptions of the factors that influence engagement in activity outside dedicated therapy sessions in a rehabilitation unit: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(6):822–830. doi: 10.1177/02692155221087424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Zammit K. Applying thematic analysis to education: a hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1–9. doi: 10.1177/1609406920918810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–352. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aali G, Drummond A, das Nair R, et al. Post-stroke fatigue: a scoping review. F1000Res. 2020;9:242. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22880.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohlmeier S, Klingler C, Schellartz I, et al. Having a break or being imprisoned: influence of subjective interpretations of quarantine and isolation on boredom. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(4):2207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu V, Weatherall M, McPherson K, et al. Taking charge after stroke: a randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(9):954–964. doi: 10.1177/1747493020915144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Sanz MB, Salazar-de-la-Guerra RM, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN, et al. Person-centred care in individuals with stroke: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):2167–2180. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2105393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698–1708 e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Bird ML, Luker J, et al. Impairments, and physical design and culture of a rehabilitation unit influence stroke survivor activity: qualitative analysis of rehabilitation staff perceptions. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(26):8436–8441. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2019840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoli A, Bianchi A, Campbell A, et al. In defence of falling: the onomastics and ethics of “therapeutic” falls in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2022:1–5. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2135777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry G, Kayes N. Person centered care in neurorehabilitation: a secondary analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(16):2334–2343. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1561952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Last N, Packham TL, Gewurtz RE, et al. Exploring patient perspectives of barriers and facilitators to participating in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(16):4201-4210. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1881830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevdzija M, Marquardt G. Stroke patients’ nonscheduled activity during inpatient rehabilitation and its relationship with the architectural layout: a multicenter shadowing study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022;29(1):9-15. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1871281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk M, Vreven J, Deschodt M, et al. Can in-hospital or post discharge caregiver involvement increase functional performance of older patients? A systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01769-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson MLA, Thombs R, Yi J. Volunteers as members of the stroke rehabilitation team: a qualitative case study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e032473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza S, Godecke E, Ciccone N, et al. Investigation of the implementation of a communication enhanced environment model on an acute/slow stream rehabilitation and a rehabilitation ward: a before-and-after pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(1):15–39. doi: 10.1177/02692155211032655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders R, Chan K, Graham RM, et al. Nursing and allied health staff perceptions and experiences of a volunteer stroke peer support program: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:3513–3522. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S341773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson-Smith R, Pflaumer L, Elf M, et al. Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wästerfors D, Åkerström M, Jacobsson K. Reanalysis of qualitative data. In: Flick E, editor. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications; 2014. p. 467–480.
   Google Scholar