1,303
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2926-2932 | Received 03 Jan 2023, Accepted 29 Jun 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023

References

  • Roos KG, Kerr ZY, Mauntel TC, et al. The epidemiology of lateral ligament complex ankle sprains in national collegiate athletic association sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(1):201–209. doi: 10.1177/0363546516660980.
  • Fong DT, Hong Y, Chan LK, et al. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med. 2007;37(1):73–94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200737010-00006.
  • Hiller CE, Nightingale EJ, Raymond J, et al. Prevalence and impact of chronic musculoskeletal ankle disorders in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1801–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.023.
  • Tanen L, Docherty CL, van der Pol B, et al. Prevalence of chronic ankle instability in high school and division I athletes. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7(1):37–44. doi: 10.1177/1938640013509670.
  • Gribble PA, Bleakley CM, Caulfield BM, et al. 2016 Consensus statement of the international ankle consortium: prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(24):1493–1495. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096188.
  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the international ankle consortium. J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):121–127. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.14.
  • Hertel J. Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):364–375.
  • Gribble PA. Evaluating and differentiating ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):617–627. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-484-17.
  • McGee RG. How to include Patient-Reported outcome measures in clinical trials. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2020;18(5):480–485. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00611-5.
  • Docherty CL, Gansneder BM, Arnold BL, et al. Development and reliability of the ankle instability instrument. J Athl Train. 2006;41(2):154–158.
  • Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty C. Development of the identification of functional ankle instability (IdFAI). Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):755–763. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0755.
  • Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, et al. The cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1235–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.022.
  • Vuurberg G, Kluit L, van Dijk CN. The cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT) in the dutch population with and without complaints of ankle instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(3):882–891. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4350-4.
  • Geerinck A, Beaudart C, Salvan Q, et al. French translation and validation of the cumberland ankle instability tool, an instrument for measuring functional ankle instability. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26(4):391–397. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.002.
  • Tsekoura M, Billis E, Fousekis K, et al. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the greek version of the cumberland ankle instability tool. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(8):954–962. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1652944.
  • Wang W, Liao D, Kang X, et al. Development of a valid chinese version of the cumberland ankle instability tool in chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87848-x.
  • Kunugi S, Masunari A, Noh B, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the japanese version of the cumberland ankle instability tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(1):50–58. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1138555.
  • Lin CI, Mayer F, Wippert PM. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validation of the Taiwan-Chinese version of cumberland ankle instability tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(5):781–787. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1774928.
  • Hadadi M, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Ebrahim Mosavi M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the persian version of the cumberland ankle instability tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(16):1644–1649. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1207105.
  • de Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959–1965. doi: 10.1080/09638280701809872.
  • Ko J, Rosen A, Brown C. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the korean version of the cumberland ankle instability tool. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:1007–1014.
  • Khan B, Ikram M, Rehman SS, et al. Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):443. ur, undoi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05408-4.
  • Cruz-Díaz D, Hita-Contreras F, Lomas-Vega R, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the spanish version of the cumberland ankle instability tool (CAIT): an instrument to assess unilateral chronic ankle instability. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(1):91–98. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2095-0.
  • Rodríguez-Fernández ÁL, Rebollo-Roldán J, Jiménez-Rejano JJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the cumberland ankle instability tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1888–1894. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.984879.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of Cross-Cultural adaptation of Self-Report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
  • Wright CJ, Arnold BL, Ross SE, et al. Recalibration and validation of the cumberland ankle instability tool cutoff score for individuals with chronic ankle instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1853–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.017.
  • Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22(10):788–794. doi: 10.1177/107110070102201004.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
  • Prion S, Haerling KA. Making sense of methods and measurement: spearman-Rho Ranked-Order correlation coefficient. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014;10(10):535–536. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2014.07.005.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
  • Goulart Neto AM, Maffulli N, Migliorini F, et al. Validation of foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM) and the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) in individuals with chronic ankle instability: a cross-sectional observational study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02925-9.
  • Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.