169
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Telephone consultation for cancer survivors with unclarified need for rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting: a mixed methods process evaluation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2901-2909 | Received 23 Dec 2022, Accepted 15 Jul 2023, Published online: 22 Jul 2023

References

  • Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Global Burden of Disease Cancer C., et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(12):1749–1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.
  • Kokkonen K, Tasmuth T, Lehto JT, et al. Cancer patients’ symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at tertiary cancer center from 2006 to 2013: a cross-sectional study. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(1):271–277. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13107.
  • Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, et al. Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(3):183–189. doi: 10.1007/BF00435383.
  • Miroševič Š, Prins JB, Selič P, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with unmet needs in post-treatment cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(3):e13060. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13060.
  • Neo J, Fettes L, Gao W, et al. Disability in activities of daily living among adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;61:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.006.
  • Thorsen L, Gjerset GM, Loge JH, et al. Cancer patients’ needs for rehabilitation services. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):212–222. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.531050.
  • Stout NL, Santa Mina D, Lyons KD, et al. A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(2):149–175. doi: 10.3322/caac.21639.
  • Lubberding S, van Uden-Kraan CF, Te Velde EA, et al. Improving access to supportive cancer care through an eHealth application: a qualitative needs assessment among cancer survivors. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(9-10):1367–1379. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12753.
  • Cochrane A, Woods S, Dunne S, et al. Unmet supportive care needs associated with quality of life for people with lung cancer: a systematic review of the evidence 2007-2020. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31:(1):e13525. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13525.
  • Blomberg K, Wengström Y, Sundberg K, et al. Symptoms and self-care strategies during and six months after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - scoping the perspectives of patients, professionals and literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;21:139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.09.004.
  • Moustsen IR, Larsen SB, Vibe-Petersen J, et al. Social position and referral to rehabilitation among cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(5):720–726. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.997836.
  • Osterman CK, Triglianos T, Winzelberg GS, et al. Risk stratification and outreach to hematology/oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(3):1161–1164. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05744-y.
  • Liptrott S, Bee P, Lovell K. Acceptability of telephone support as perceived by patients with cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(1):e12643. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12643.
  • Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, et al. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):Cd007568.
  • Alter CL, Fleishman SB, Kornblith AB, et al. Supportive telephone intervention for patients receiving chemotherapy. A pilot study. Psychosomatics. 1996;37(5):425–431. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(96)71529-3.
  • Donnelly JM, Kornblith AB, Fleishman S, et al. A pilot study of interpersonal psychotherapy by telephone with cancer patients and their partners. Psychooncology. 2000;9(1):44–56. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(200001/02)9:1<44::AID-PON431>3.0.CO;2-V.
  • Harrison JD, Young JM, Solomon MJ, et al. Randomized pilot evaluation of the supportive care intervention "CONNECT" for people following surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(5):622–631. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820bc152.
  • Young J, Harrison J, Solomon M, et al. Development and feasibility assessment of telephone-delivered supportive care to improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer: pilot study of the CONNECT intervention. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(4):461–470. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0689-0.
  • Young JM, Butow PN, Walsh J, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of centralized Nurse-Led Telephone-Based care coordination to improve outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer: the CONNECT intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3585–3591. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.1036.
  • Dirven L, van de Poll-Franse LV, Aaronson NK, et al. Controversies in defining cancer survivorship. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):610–612. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70236-6.
  • Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
  • Borglin G. The value of mixed methods for researching complex interventions. In: Richards DA, Rahm Hallberg I, editors. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 29–45.
  • Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
  • Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
  • Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, et al. Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs. 2018;23(1):42–55. doi: 10.1177/1744987117741667.
  • Brinkmann S, Kvale S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2018.
  • Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, et al. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):215824401452263. doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633.
  • McDowell ME, Occhipinti S, Ferguson M, et al. Predictors of change in unmet supportive care needs in cancer. Psychooncology. 2010;19(5):508–516. doi: 10.1002/pon.1604.
  • Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, et al. What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(8):1117–1128. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5.
  • Hand KE, Cunningham RS. Telephone calls postdischarge from hospital to home:a literature review [article. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(1):45–52. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.18-01AP.
  • Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25(57):1–132. doi: 10.3310/hta25570.
  • Schuster-Bruce AT, Middleton HAR, Macpherson C, et al. Patient satisfaction with nurse-led end of treatment telephone consultation for breast cancer during COVID-19 pandemic. Breast J. 2021;27(1):77–79. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14034.
  • Vaona A, Pappas Y, Grewal RS, et al. Training interventions for improving telephone consultation skills in clinicians. Cochrane Libr. 2017;2017(2):CD010034.
  • van Galen LS, Car J. Telephone consultations. BMJ. 2018;360:k1047–k1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1047.
  • Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research – an overview. In: Linnan L, Steckler A, editors. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 1–23.
  • Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions - UK medical research council (MRC) guidance. London: medical Research Council; 2015.
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
  • Minary L, Trompette J, Kivits J, et al. Which design to evaluate complex interventions? Toward a methodological framework through a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):92–100. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0736-6.
  • O’cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–98. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074.
  • Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018. (Introducing qualitative methods.).
  • Feeley N, Cossette S. Testing the waters. In: Richards DA, Rahm Hallberg I, editors. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 166–174.
  • Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
  • Stout N, Silver J, Raj V, et al. Toward a national initiative in cancer rehabilitation: recommendations from a subject matter expert group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(11):2006–2015. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.