A framework to support early team-based provision of vocational rehabilitation for adults with acquired brain injury

References

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability in Australia: acquired brain injury. Canberra: AIHW; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, Edelaar MJ, et al. How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2009;23(6):473–488. doi: 10.1080/02699050902970737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkin C, Phillips J, Radford K. What is ‘retun to work’ following traumatic brain injury? Analysis of work outcomes 12 months post TBI. Brain Inj. 2020;34(1):68–77. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1681512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):100–110. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9436-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shames J, Treger I, Ring H, et al. Return to work following traumatic brain injury: trends and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1387–1395. doi: 10.1080/09638280701315011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, van Dormolen M, et al. Factors influencing return to work experienced by people with acquired brain injury: a qualitative research study. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(23-24):2237–2246. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.563821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libeson L, Downing M, Ross P, et al. The experience of return to work in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): a qualitative study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(3):412–429. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1470987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker-Cools BHPM, Wind H, Frings-Dresen MHW. Prognostic factors of return to work after traumatic or non-traumatic acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(8):733–741. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1061608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker-Cools BHPM, Schouten MJE, Wind H, et al. Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(2):185–191. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1250118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek P, Bowers B, Turkstra LS. Characterizing common workplace communication skills for disorders associated with traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study. J Vocat Rehabil. 2016;44(1):15–31. doi: 10.3233/JVR-150777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenson C, Svensson E, Linddahl I, et al. Experiences of returning to work after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occup Ther. 2007;14(4):205–214. doi: 10.1080/11038120601110934.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macaden AS, Chandler BJ, Chandler C, et al. Sustaining employment after vocational rehabilitation in acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1140–1147. doi: 10.3109/09638280903311594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman A, Meehan M, Tuner-Stokes L. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: inter-agency guidelines. London: British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vocational Rehabilitation Association UK. VRA standards of practice and code of ethics for vocational rehabilitation practitioners. 2nd Edition. Doncaster: vocational Rehabilitation Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Brusco NK. The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(5):562–572. doi: 10.1310/tsr1805-562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford K, Sutton C, Sach T, et al. Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: the FRESH feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22(33):1–124. doi: 10.3310/hta22330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T. A metacognitive contextual approach for facilitating return to work following acquired brain injury: three descriptive case studies. Work. 2010;36(4):381–388. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray A, Watter K, McLennan V, et al. Identifying models, processes and components of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a systematic scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(24):7641–7654. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1980622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadyl JK, McPherson KM. Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a review of the evidence. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(3):195–212. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181a0d458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman A. Vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: models and services. Neurorehabilitation. 2012;31(1):51–62. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz B, Claros-Salinas D, Streibelt M. Meta-Synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):28–44. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson MB. A model to guide the rehabilitation of high-functioning employees after mild brain injury. Work. 2010;36(4):449–457. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita M, Rappolt S, Kirsh B, et al. Evaluating work readiness following acquired brain injury: building a shared understanding. Can J Occup Ther. 2009;76(4):276–284. doi: 10.1177/000841740907600406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae P, Hallab L, Simpson G. Navigating employment pathways and supports following brain injury in Australia: client perspectives. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling. 2016;22(2):76–92. doi: 10.1017/jrc.2016.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilworth G, Carey A, Eyres S, et al. Screening for job loss: development of a work instability scale for traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20(8):835–843. doi: 10.1080/02699050600832221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilworth G, Eyres S, Carey A, et al. Working with a brain injury: personal experiences of returning to work following a mild or moderate brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(5):334–339. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffding LK, Nielsen MH, Rasmussen MA, et al. A manual-based vocational rehabilitation program for patients with an acquired brain injury: study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Trials. 2017;18(1):371–371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2115-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips J, Radford K. Vocational rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: what is the evidence for clinical practice? Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation: ACNR. 2014;4(5):14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston V, Brakenridge C, Valiant D, et al. Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders’ views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2022;1–24. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2022.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagan E, Ownsworth T, McDonald S, et al. A survey of multidisciplinary clinicians working in rehabilitation for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2015;16(3):173–195. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2015.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watter K, Murray A, McLennan V, et al. Clinician perspectives of ABI vocational rehabilitation in Queensland. Brain Impairment. 2023;1–24. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2023.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Health. Statewide adult brain injury rehabilitation health service plan 2016-2026. Brisbane: Queensland Health System, Policy and Planning Division; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Watter K, Kennedy A, McLennan V, et al. Consumer perspectives of vocational rehabilitation and return to work following acquired brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2022;23(2):164–184. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2021.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. 3rd ed. Sydney: Elsevier; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Standards for the provision of rehabilitation medicine services in the ambulatory setting. Sydney: Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Standards for the provision of inpatient adult rehabilitation medicine services in public and private hospitals. Sydney: Royal Australasian College of Physicians; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velzen JM, Van Bennekom CA, Frings-Dresen MH. Availability of vocational rehabilitation services for people with acquired brain injury in Dutch rehabilitation institutions. Brain Inj. 2020;34(10):1401–1407. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns SP, Schwartz JK, Scott SL, et al. Interdisciplinary approaches to facilitate return to driving and return to work in mild stroke: a position paper. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2018;99(11):2378–2388. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell L, Boak G. Developing competence frameworks in UK healthcare: lessons from practice. J Euro Ind Train. 2009;33(8/9):701–717. doi: 10.1108/03090590910993580.
   Google Scholar
• Division of Rehabilitation. Acquired Brain Injury Transitional Rehabilitation Service Model of Care. Brisbane: Metro South Health, Queensland Health; 2020. Available from: https://metrosouth.health.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/abitrs-model-care.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–84. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Bayona N, Marshall S, et al. A systematic review of the rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injuries. Brain Inj. 2007;21(2):107–112. doi: 10.1080/02699050701201524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Marshall S, Cullen N, et al. Introduction and methodology. In: Teasell R, Marshall S, Cullen N, editors. Evidence-based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. Version 15.0. 2022. p. 1–14. Available from: https://erabi.ca/modules/module-1/
   Google Scholar
• Haydel MJ. Evaluation of traumatic brain injury, acute. BMJ Best Practice. 2023. Available from: https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-us/515
   Google Scholar
• Borg D, Nielsen M, Kennedy A, et al. The effect of access to a designated interdisciplinary post-acute rehabilitation service on participant outcomes after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2020;34(10):1358–1366. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1802660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohan JK, Nielsen M, Watter K, et al. “It gave her that soft landing”: consumer perspectives on a transitional rehabilitation service for adults with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023;33(6):1144–1173. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2070222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):585–587. ():doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler R, Kopke S, Meyer G. Criteria for reporting the development and evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2). Trials. 2015;16(:204. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0709-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agency for Clinical Innovation. Understanding the process to develop a model of Care - An ACI framework. Sydney: NSW Government; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Snelgrove S. Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2019;20(3), Art. 23. doi: 10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376.
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health researchers. London: SAGE Publications; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Boake C, et al. The awareness questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency. Brain Inj. 1998;12(1):63–68. doi: 10.1080/026990598122863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Roberts M, Esmail S, et al. Validation of the readiness for return-to-work scale in outpatient occupational rehabilitation in Canada. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):332–345. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9721-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooson JM, Coetzer R, Stew G, et al. Patients’ experience of return to work rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a phenomenological study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(1):19–44. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.713314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Muenchberger H, Gee T. Vocational rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a quantitative synthesis of outcome studies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2006;25(3):149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Dillahunt-Aspillaga C, Jorgensen Smith T, Hanson A, et al. Exploring vocational evaluation practices following traumatic brain injury. Behav Neurol. 2015;2015:924027. doi: 10.1155/2015/924027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiou-Kita M, Yantzi A, Wan J. The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: occupational therapists’ perceptions. Brain Inj. 2010;24(7-8):948–958. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2010.491495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Dijkers M, Whyte J, et al. Vocational interventions and supports following job placement for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Vocl Rehab. 2010;32(3):135–150. doi: 10.3233/JVR-2010-0505.
   Google Scholar
• Piccenna L, Lannin N, Gruen R, et al. The experience of discharge for patients with an acquired brain injury from the inpatient to the community setting: a qualitative review. Brain Inj. 2016;30(3):241–251. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1113569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie L, Egan C, Wyborn J, et al. Evaluating client experience of rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a cross-sectional study. Brain Inj. 2021;35(2):215–225. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1867768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes P, Arru P, Corry R, et al. Patient reported experiences of using community rehabilitation and/or support services whilst living with a long-term neurological condition: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation. Int J Audiol. 2022;41(23):1–9. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1473508.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Doig E, Kendall M, et al. Hope: a further dimension for engaging family members of people with ABI. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(3):475–480. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Bellon M, Lawn S, et al. Family-directed approach to brain injury (FAB) model: a preliminary framework to guide family-directed intervention for individuals with brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(7):854–860. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1407966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. BSRM standards for rehabilitation services, mapped onto the national services framework for long-term conditions. London: BSRM; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann JD. Interpreting the meaning individuals ascribe to returning to work after traumatic brain injury: a qualitative approach. Brain Inj. 2004;18(9):941–955. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001671919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar