99
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Translation, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure scale (BPOM-Br)

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 3709-3716 | Received 25 Apr 2023, Accepted 18 Aug 2023, Published online: 25 Aug 2023

References

  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF; 2001. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
  • Duijnisveld BJ, Saraç Ç, Malessy MJA, et al. Developing core sets for patients with obstetric brachial plexus injury based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Bone Joint Res. 2013;2(6):116–121. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000153.
  • Sarac C, Duijnisveld BJ, Weide AVD, et al. Outcome measures used in clinical studies on neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic literature review using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2015;8(3):167–186. doi:10.3233/PRM-150335.
  • Ho ES, Curtis CG, Clarke HM. The brachial plexus outcome measure: development, internal consistency, and construct validity. J Hand Ther. 2012;25(4):406–416; quiz 417. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2012.05.002.
  • Matos MA, Souto DO, Soares BA, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions in children with brachial plexus birth injury: a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2023;26(1):52–62. doi:10.1080/17518423.2022.2099995.
  • Chang KWC, Justice D, Chung KC, et al. A systematic review of evaluation methods for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12(4):395–405. doi:10.3171/2013.6.PEDS12630.
  • Spaargaren E, Ahmed J, Van Ouwerkerk WJR, et al. Aspects of activities and participation of 7-8 year-old children with an obstetric brachial plexus injury. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011;15(4):345–352. doi:10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.03.008.
  • Strömbeck C, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Remahl S, et al. Long-term follow-up of children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy: functional aspects. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(3):198–203. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00198.x.
  • Ho ES, Curtis CG, Clarke HM. Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory: Its application to children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2006;31(2):197–202. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.007.
  • Gladstein AZ, Sachleben B, Ho ES, et al. Forearm pronation osteotomy for supination contracture secondary to obstetrical brachial plexus palsy: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37(6):e357–e363. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001053.
  • Coroneos CJ, Voineskos SH, Christakis MK, et al. Obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI): canada’s national clinical practice guideline. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e014141. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014141.
  • Duff SV, Dematteo C. Clinical assessment of the infant and child following perinatal brachial plexus injury. J Hand Ther. 2015;28(2):126–133; quiz 134. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.001.
  • Pondaag W, Malessy MJA. Outcome assessment for brachial plexus birth injury. Results from the iPluto world-wide consensus survey. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(9):2533–2541. doi:10.1002/jor.23901.
  • Hosbay Z, Ozkan S, Tanriverdi M, et al. Reliability and validity of the brachial plexus outcome measure in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(3):382–387. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.006.
  • Hambleton RK. The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2001;17(3):164–172. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164.
  • Waclawski ER. Health measurement scales–a practical guide to their development and use. Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2010;60(2):156–156. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp179.
  • Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661–671. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016.
  • Mokkink LB, Boers M, van der Vleuten CPM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a delphi study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):293. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5.
  • Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of heatth status measures. Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;24(2):61–63. doi:10.3109/03009749509099285.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of Cross-Cultural adaptation of Self-Report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
  • Hardesty DM, Bearden WO. The use of expert judges in scale development. Implications for Improving Face Validity of Measures of Unobservable Constructs. J Bus Res. 2004;57:98–107.
  • Curtis C, Stephens D, Clarke HM, et al. The active movement scale: an evaluative tool for infants with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(3):470–478. doi:10.1053/jhsu.2002.32965.
  • Mallet J. Obstetrical paralysis of the brachial plexus. Etiopathogenesis [french. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1972;58(Suppl 1):Suppl 1:119–23.
  • Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST. Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86(2):94–99. doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61211-4.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–310.
  • Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86(5):735–743. doi:10.1093/ptj/86.5.735.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, et al. The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105–113. doi:10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.