746
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Standardized circuit class group training versus individualized goal-directed group training to improve upper limb function in stroke survivors during in-patient rehabilitation: a pragmatic trial

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3660-3672 | Received 02 Nov 2022, Accepted 31 Aug 2023, Published online: 20 Sep 2023

References

  • English C, Veerbeek J. Is more physiotherapy better after stroke? Int J Stroke. 2015;10(4):465–466. doi:10.1111/ijs.12474.
  • Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better ? Using metadata to explore dose – response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2053–2058. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD.
  • Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):823–830. doi:10.1080/09638280500534861.
  • West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:813765–813713. doi:10.1155/2012/813765.
  • Ada L, Dean CM, Mackey FH. Increasing the amount of physical activity undertaken after stroke. Phys Ther Rev. 2006;11(2):91–100. doi:10.1179/108331906X98994.
  • McHugh G, Swain ID. A comparison between reported and ideal patient-to-therapist ratios for stroke rehabilitation. Health (Irvine Calif). 2013;05(06):105–112. doi:10.4236/health.2013.56A2016.
  • Rensink M, Schuurmans M, Lindeman E, et al. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(4):737–754. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04925.x.
  • Church G, Parker J, Powell L, et al. The effectiveness of group exercise for improving activity and participation in adult stroke survivors: a systematic review. Physiother (United Kingdom). 2019;105(4):399–411. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.005.
  • Renner CI, Outermans J, Ludwig R, et al. Group therapy task training versus individual task training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(7):637–648. doi:10.1177/0269215515600206.
  • Dam SL, Rhind DJA. The perceived benefits of community-based group exercise sessions for survivors of stroke. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2020;27(2):1–14. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2016.0049.
  • Lee TD, Swanson LR, Hall AL. What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):150–156. doi:10.1093/ptj/71.2.150.
  • English C, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(7):565–571. doi:10.2340/16501977-0824.
  • English C, Port I Van De, Lynch E. Group circuit class therapy for stroke survivors – a review of the evidence and clinical implications. Phys Ther Perspect 21th Century – Challenges Possibilities, IntechOpen. 2012;:349–380. doi:10.5772/2257.
  • English C, Hillier SL, Lynch EA. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD007513. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007513.pub3.
  • Wevers L, I Van De P, Vermue M, et al. Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2450–2459. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541946.
  • Valles KB, Montes S, Madrigal MDJ, et al. Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a robot/technology-assisted therapy gym. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13:1–15. doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0190-1.
  • Hesse S, Heß A, Werner C C, et al. Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(7):637–647. doi:10.1177/0269215513516967.
  • Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(4):409–417. doi:10.1053/mr.2000.3839.
  • Blennerhassett J, Dite W. Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke : a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(4):219–224. doi:10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60111-2.
  • Moon J-H, Park K-Y, Kim H-J, et al. The effects of task-oriented circuit training using rehabilitation tools on the upper-extremity functions and daily activities of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2018;9(5):225–230. doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.03.
  • Steultjens EMJ, Cup EHC, Zajec JErgotherapierichtlijn CVA, et al. 2013.
  • Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(9):793–799. doi:10.1177/1545968317732668.
  • Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy. KNGF clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Pract Guidel. 2014;04:1–72.
  • Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, et al. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3-4):175–189. doi:10.1002/oti.
  • Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, et al. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(3):58–65. doi:10.1310/bqm5-6ygb-mvj5-wvcr.
  • Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, et al. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52(3):269–293. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003.
  • Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
  • Beerepoot C. Artikel keypoint circuittraining. Keypoint Neurorevalidatie 2016; June:14–7.
  • Platz T, Kaick SV, Mehrholz J, et al. Best conventional therapy versus modular impairment-oriented training for arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(7):706–716. doi:10.1177/1545968309335974.
  • Van De Port IGL, Wevers LEG, Lindeman E, et al. Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;344(may10 1):e2672–e2672. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2672.
  • Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–475. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.011.
  • Law M, Baptiste S, Mccoll M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure : an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57(2):82–87. doi:10.1177/000841749005700207.
  • Van Duijn HM, Niezen AA, Cardol M, et al. Canadees meetinstrument voor handelingen en vaardigheden [Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)—Dutch version] 1999.
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. JRM. 1975;7(1):13–31. doi:10.2340/1650197771331.
  • Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse By shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61(2):281–293. doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.61-281.
  • Morris DMM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006;42(3):257–268.
  • Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):75–84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x.
  • Van Der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1410–1414. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000126900.24964.7e.
  • Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The motor activity log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1189–1194. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
  • Nygren TE. Psychometric properties of subjective workload measurement techniques: implications for their use in the assessment of perceived mental workload. Hum Factors. 1991;33(1):17–33. doi:10.1177/001872089103300102.
  • Devos H, Gustafson K, Ahmadnezhad P, et al. Psychometric properties of NASA-TLX and index of cognitive activity as measures of cognitive workload in older adults. Brain Sci. 2020;10(12):994. doi:10.3390/brainsci10120994.
  • Yozbatiran N, Der-Yeghiaian L, Cramer SC. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):78–90. doi:10.1177/1545968307305353.
  • Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, et al. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):14–19. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.18668.
  • Nordin Å, Murphy MA, Danielsson A. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability at the item level of the action research arm test for patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(8):738–745. doi:10.2340/16501977-1831.
  • Thyer L, Brown T, Roe D. The validity of the Canadian occupational performance measure (COPM) when used in a sub-acute rehabilitation setting with older adults. Occup Ther Health Care. 2018;32(2):137–153. doi:10.1080/07380577.2018.1446233.
  • Eyssen ICJM, Steultjens MPM, Oud TAM, et al. Responsiveness of the Canadian occupational performance measure. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(5):517–528. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0110.
  • Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire: psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233–237. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x.
  • Arya KN, Verma R, Garg RK. Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18 Suppl 1(sup1):599–610. doi:10.1310/tsr18s01-599.
  • Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240. doi:10.1177/154596802401105171.
  • Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951;74(4):443–480. doi:10.1093/brain/74.4.443.
  • Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, et al. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):103. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-103.
  • Murrock CJ, Bekhet A, Zauszniewski JA. Psychometric evaluation of the physical activity enjoyment scale in adults with functional limitations. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016;37(3):164–171. doi:10.3109/01612840.2015.1088904.
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium : Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
  • Harris P, Taylor R, Thielk R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
  • Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying cluster analysis to upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):456–462. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.023.
  • Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92(6):791–798. doi:10.2522/ptj.20110009.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281–299.
  • Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63(4):655–660. doi:10.1079/pns2004399.
  • Friese S. Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. Londen, England: sage; 2019.
  • Taub E, McCulloch K, Uswatte G, et al. Motor activity log (MAL) manual. Ther Res Gr. 2011;:1–18. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34348.
  • Timmermans AAA, Seelen HAM, Willmann RD, et al. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(16):1344–1352. doi:10.1080/09638280902823664.
  • Dobe J, Gustafsson L, Walder K. Co-creation and stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2023;45(3):562–574. doi:10.1080/09638288.2022.2032411.