It might take a village: developing a rehabilitation program of care for degenerative cervical radiculopathy from the patient perspective

References

• Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):392–399. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp043887.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuijper B, Tans JT, Schimsheimer RJ, et al. Degenerative cervical radiculopathy: diagnosis and conservative treatment. A review. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(1):15–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02365.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):307–319. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JJ, Côté P, Quesnele JJ, et al. The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1781–1789. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onks CA, Billy G. Evaluation and treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Prim Care. 2013;40(4):837–848, vii–viii. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2013.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods BI, Hilibrand AS. Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(5):E251–9. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleijser-Koehorst MLS, Coppieters MW, Heymans MW, et al. Clinical course and prognostic models for the conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2710–2719. doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5777-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plener J, Csiernik B, To D, et al. Conservative management of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2023;39(3):138–146. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000001092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo C, Salvioli S, Gianola S, et al. Traction therapy for cervical radicular syndrome is statistically significant but not clinically relevant for pain relief. A systematic literature review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3389. doi:10.3390/jcm9113389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Feng M, Cui X, et al. The effect of exercise on cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(45):e17733. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000017733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo A, Vanti C, Boldrini V, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: effectiveness of adding traction to physical therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2018;98(4):231–242. doi:10.1093/physth/pzy001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoomes EJ, Scholten-Peeters W, Koes B, et al. The effectiveness of conservative treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(12):1073–1086. doi:10.1097/AJP.0b013e31828441fb.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Wei X, Wang S. Does cervical spine manipulation reduce pain in people with degenerative cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review of the evidence, and a meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(2):145–155. doi:10.1177/0269215515570382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallard F, Wong JJ, Lemeunier N, et al. Effectiveness of multimodal rehabilitation interventions for management of cervical radiculopathy in adults: an updated systematic review from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (optima) collaboration. J Rehabil Med. 2022;54:jrm00318. doi:10.2340/jrm.v54.2799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté P, Wong JJ, Sutton D, et al. Management of neck pain and associated disorders: a clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):2000–2022. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4467-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, et al. National clinical guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(9):2242–2257. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5121-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoomes E, Graaf MT, Cleland JA, et al. Timing of evidence-based nonsurgical interventions as part of multimodal treatment guidelines for the management of cervical radiculopathy: a Delphi study. Phys Ther. 2022;102(5):pzab312. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzab312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser Z, Ortega B, D’Oro A, et al. Spine degenerative conditions and their treatments: national trends in the United States of America. Global Spine J. 2018;8(1):57–67. doi:10.1177/2192568217696688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes R, Devereaux P, Guyatt G. Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. ACP J Club. 2002;136(2):A11–A14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. Jan 13 doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What is patient-centered care?: NEJM Catalyst. 2017; Available from: 10.1056/CAT.17.0559
   Google Scholar
• Lyle S, Williamson E, Darton F, et al. A qualitative study of older people’s experience of living with neurogenic claudication to inform the development of a physiotherapy intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(10):1009–1017. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1177611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–165. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez ME, Ruiter RAC, Markham CM, et al. Intervention mapping: theory- and evidence-based health promotion program planning: perspective and examples. Front Public Health. 2019;7:209. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RJ, Caird J, Oliver K, et al. Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. Health Expect. 2011;14(4):439–448. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00648.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Dekker S, Jurg D, et al. Making the patient voice heard in a research consortium: experiences from an EU project (IMI-APPROACH). Res Involv Engagem. 2021;7(1):24. 2021/05/10. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00267-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2503–2504. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell J. Qaulitatve inquiry & reserach design. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Plener J, Mior S, Atkinson-Graham M, et al. Information is power: a qualitative study exploring the lived experiences of patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy. PAIN. 2023. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003019. Epub ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, et al. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990.Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325–335. doi:10.1093/brain/117.2.325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, et al. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:160940691987459. doi:10.1177/1609406919874596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch P, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. TQR. 2015;20:1408–1416. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. 2006/02/01. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer BE, Witkop CT, Varpio L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(2):90–97. doi:10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrini S, Selb M, Kiekens C, et al. Rehabilitation definition for research purposes. A global stakeholders’ initiative by cochrane rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(3):333–341. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07509-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bove AM, Lynch AD, Ammendolia C, et al. Patients’ experience with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a qualitative study. Spine J. 2018;18(4):639–647. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith R, Williams N, Wood F. Understanding sciatica: illness and treatment beliefs in a lumbar radicular pain population. A qualitative interview study. BJGP Open. 2019;3(3):bjgpopen19X101654. doi:10.3399/bjgpopen19X101654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopayian K, Notley C. A systematic review of low back pain and sciatica patients’ expectations and experiences of health care. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1769–1780. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth M, Warne T, Haigh C. Pain from the inside: understanding the theoretical underpinning of person-centered care delivered by pain teams. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014;15(1):340–348. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2012.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittinty MM, Lee J, de CWAC, et al. Exploring patient experiences of a pain management centre: a qualitative study. Scand J Pain. 2017;17(1):378–381. doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.09.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teh CF, Karp JF, Kleinman A, et al. Older people’s experiences of patient-centered treatment for chronic pain: a qualitative study. Pain Med. 2009;10(3):521–530. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00556.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson B, Gard G, Karlsson L, et al. Patient expectations for a multimodal pain rehabilitation programme: active participation and coping skills. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(21):2135–2143. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1114154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hållstam A, Stålnacke BM, Svensen C, et al. “Change is possible”: patients’ experience of a multimodal chronic pain rehabilitation programme. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47(3):242–248. doi:10.2340/16501977-1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1087–1110. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen ML, Cook BL, Carson N, et al. Patient-provider therapeutic alliance contributes to patient activation in community mental health clinics. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017;44(4):431–440. doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0655-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):375. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2311-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldwin SA, Wampold BE, Imel ZE. Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007;75(6):842–852. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe M, Whitehead L, Seaton P, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis: the experience of chronic pain across conditions. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(5):1004–1016. doi:10.1111/jan.13174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts JW, Willems PC, Lockwood C, et al. Patient expectations for management of chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2017;20(6):1201–1217. Decdoi: 10.1111/hex.12527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsivais DB, Engebretson JC. Cultural cues: review of qualitative evidence of patient-centered care in patients with nonmalignant chronic pain. Rehabil Nurs. 2011;36(4):166–171. doi:10.1002/j.2048-7940.2011.tb00085.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subialka J, Smith K, Signorino J, et al. What do patients referred to physical therapy for a musculoskeletal condition expect? A qualitative assessment. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;59:102543. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh G, Thoms G. Living with chronic pain: the patient’s perspective. Nurs Stand. 2001;15(52):33–37. doi:10.7748/ns2001.09.15.52.33.c3082.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer AND, Giardina TD, Khawaja L, et al. Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(11):2606–2615. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietilä Holmner E, Stålnacke BM, Enthoven P, et al. “The acceptance” of living with chronic pain - an ongoing process: a qualitative study of patient experiences of multimodal rehabilitation in primary care. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):73–79. doi:10.2340/16501977-2286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85(3):317–332. doi:10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2011;11(1):64–72. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim YZ, Chou L, Au RT, et al. People with low back pain want clear, consistent and personalised information on prognosis, treatment options and self-management strategies: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2019;65(3):124–135. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2019.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walderhaug KE, Nyquist MK, Mjølstad BP. GP strategies to avoid imaging overuse. A qualitative study in norwegian general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022;40(1):48–56. doi:10.1080/02813432.2022.2036480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taso M, Sommernes JH, Bjorland S, et al. What is success of treatment? Expected outcome scores in cervical radiculopathy patients were much higher than the previously reported cut-off values for success. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(10):2761–2768. doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07234-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber C, Behbahani M, Baardsen R, et al. Patients’ beliefs about diagnosis and treatment of cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(12):2379–2384. doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3356-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136. doi:10.1126/science.847460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilwell P, Harman K. An enactive approach to pain: beyond the biopsychosocial model. Phenom Cogn Sci. 2019;18(4):637–665. doi:10.1007/s11097-019-09624-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack B, Stilwell P, Coninx S, et al. The biopsychosocial model is lost in translation: from misrepresentation to an enactive modernization. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;28:1–16. doi:10.1080/09593985.2022.2080130.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsen AS, Guassora AD, Reventlow S. Understanding the body-mind in primary care. Med Health Care Philos. 2016;19(4):581–594. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9710-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan S. Bio-psycho-social interaction: an enactive perspective. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2021;33(5):471–477. doi:10.1080/09540261.2020.1830753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemi SN. The rise and fall of the biopsychosocial model. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(1):3–4. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.063859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aftab A, Nielsen K. From engel to enactivism: contextualizing the biopsychosocial model. EuJAP. 2021;17(2):5–22. doi:10.31820/ejap.17.2.3.
   Google Scholar