Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 24, 2002 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
536
Views
88
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Predictors of quality of life following stroke

A.E. Mackenzie Department of Nursing, Floor 7 CCV Chung Chi, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
&
A.M. Chang Department of Nursing, Floor 7 CCV Chung Chi, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
Pages 259-265 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) PostStroke Rehabilitation. AHCPR, Clinical Guideline Number 16, Publication No. 95-0062, Rockville, MD, 1995.
  • Boult C, Brummel-Smith K. Post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1997; 45: 881-883.
  • Dorman P, Dennis M, Sandercock P. On behalf of the United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Are the modified 'simple questions' a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2000; 69, 487-493.
  • Wade D, de Jong B. Recent advances in rehabilitation. British Medical Journalism, 3020: 1385-1388.
  • Tennant A, Geddes JM, Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Outcome following stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 278-284.
  • Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 20042010.
  • Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration (SUTC). Organized inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1998; 3.
  • American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Facts. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association, statistical update, 2001.
  • Department of Health. Our Healthier Nation. London: HMSO, 1998.
  • Kay R. Cerebrovascular disease in Hong Kong. Journal of the Hong Kong Medical Association 1993; 42: 3-6.
  • Sze KH, Wong E, Or KH, Lum Cm, Woo J. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 876-880.
  • Sim CM, Sze FK, Or KH, Sum C, Woo J. Outcome after stroke rehabilitation in Hong Kong. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997; 11: 236-242.
  • Hochstenbach J, Donders R, Mulder T, Van Limbeck J, Schoonderwaldt H. Long-term outcome after stroke: a disabilityorientated approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1996; 19: 189-200.
  • Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R, Cava M, Weir N, Heathcote K. Measuring the quality of life of older persons: a model with implications for community and public health nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies 1997; 34: 231-239.
  • Anderson KL, Burckhardt, CS. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for heatlh care intervention and research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1999; 29: 298-306.
  • Sandin KJ, Cifu DX, Noll SF. Stroke rehabilitation, 4, psychologic and social implications. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994; 75: S52-S55.
  • De Haan RJ, Limburg M, Van der Meulen JHP, Jacobs HM, Aaronson NK. Quality of life after stroke: impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke 1995; 26: 402-408.
  • Bergner M, Bobitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care 1981; Ift 787-805.
  • Nydevik I, Hulter-Asberg K. Sickness impact after stroke.Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 1992; 10: 284-289.
  • Nydevik I, Hulter-Asberg K. Subjective dysfunction after stroke: astudy with the Sickness Impact Profile. Scandinavian Journal ofPrimary Health Care 1991; 9: 271 -275.
  • De Bruin AF, De Witte LP, Stevens F, Diederiks JPM. Sickness Impact Profile: the state of the art of a generic functional status measure. Social Science & Medicine 1992; 24 1003-1014.
  • Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1993; 46: 1417-1432.
  • Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1919; 60: 145-154.
  • Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social Personal Relationships 1987; 4: 497-510.
  • Schilling J, Greidanus J, Meyboom-De Jong B. Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the sickness impact profile. Disability & Rehabilitation 1993; 15: 19-23.
  • Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitative setting. Neurology 1996:47:388-392.
  • Yoon H. Factors affecting quality of life of the Korean aged stroke patients. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development 1997:44:167-181.
  • King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1996; 27: 1467-1472.
  • Pound P, Bury M, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Stroke patients views on their admission to hospital. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 18-22.
  • Kotila M, Numminen H, Waltimo O, Kaste M. Depression after stroke: results of the FINNSTROKE study. Stroke 1998; 2ft 368 372.
  • Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kolien BJ, Langhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-489.
  • Kelly-Hayes M, Paige C. Assessment and psychologic factors in stroke rehabilitation. Neurology 1995; 4ft S29-S32.
  • Change AM, Mackenzie AE. State self-esteem following stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 2325-2328.
  • Colantonio A, Stanislav V, Ostfield AM, Berkman LF. Psychosocial preditors of stroke outcomes in an elderly population. Journal of Gerontology & Social Science 1993; 48: S261-S268.
  • Glass TA, Matcher DB, Belyea M, Feussner JR. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993; 124(1): 64-70.
  • Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, Lawrence JM, Williams JI. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disability & Rehabilitation 1999; 21: 116-123.
  • Penninx BWJH, Kriegsman DMW, van-Eijk JTM, Boeke AJP, Deeg DJH. Differential effect of social support on the course of chronic disease: a criteria-based literature study. Families, Systems and Health 19%; 14: 223-244.
  • Cutrona CE. Objective determinants of perceived social support. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 1986; 5ft 349-355.
  • Ngan R. The availability of informal support networks to the Chinese elderly in Hong Kong and its implications for practice. Hong Kong Journal of Gerontology 1990; 4: 19-25.
  • Lubben JE, Chi I. Cross-national comparison of social support among the elderly Chinese and Chinese Americans. Paper presented at the XlVth World Congress of Gerontology, Budapest, Hungary, April 1993.
  • Lau A, McKenna K. Conceptualizing quality of life for elderly people with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 227238.
  • Chi I, Chiu E. Ageing in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Ageing 1999; 1 & 66-71.
  • Lui NHL, Lee DTF, Mackenzie AE. Community care of older Chinese people in Hong Kong: a selective review. Australasian Journal of Ageing 2000; 19: 180-184.
  • Dungan JM, Brown AV, Ramsey MA. Health maintenance for the independent frail older adult: can it improve physical and mental well-being? Journal of Advanced Nursing 1996; 23: 1185-1193.
  • Freidland JF, McGiIl MA. Social support intervention after stroke: results of a randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 573-581.
  • Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Kotila M, Waltimo O. Quality of life four years after stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1101-1107.
  • Woo J, Yuen YK, Kay R, Nicholls MG. Survival, disability and residence 20 months after actue stroke in a Chinese population: implications for community care. Disability & Rehabilitation 1992; 14: 36-40.
  • Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine 1999;48: 1173-1187.
  • Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N. Disablement following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999; 21: 258-268.
  • Dijkers M. Measuring quality of life: methodological issues. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1999; 78: 286-300.
  • Keith RA. Functional status and health status. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 440-445.
  • Post MWM, de Bruin A, de Witte L, Schrijvers A. The SIP 68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1996; TJ: 440-445.
  • Van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limberg M, Schilling J, Bossuyt PM, van den Bos GAM. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 199728:2155-2161.
  • Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997; 28: 1541-1549.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.