462
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sex role socialization and perceptions of student academic dishonesty by male and female accounting faculty

, &
Pages 1-26 | Received 30 Jul 2016, Accepted 27 Jul 2017, Published online: 07 Aug 2017

References

  • Akers, M. D., & Eaton, T. V. (2003). Underreporting of chargeable time: The impact of sex and characteristics of under reporters. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 82–96.
  • Aldrich, D., & Kage, R. (2003). Mars and Venus at twilight: A critical investigation of moralism, age effects, and sex differences. Political Psychology, 24(1), 23–40.
  • American Accounting Association. (2008). Accounting faculty in U.S. colleges and universities: Status and trends, 1993–2004.
  • Ballantine, J., McCourt Larres, P., & Mulgrew, M. (2014). Determinants of academic cheating behavior: The future for accountancy in Ireland. Accounting Forum, 38, 55–66.
  • Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies-a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.
  • Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. (1961). Bays in white: Student culture in medical school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Borkowski, S., & Ugras, Y. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.
  • Brady, N., & Hart, D. (2007). An exploration into the developmental psychology of ethical theory with implications for business practice and pedagogy. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 397–412.
  • Bragg, A. K. (1976). The socialization process in higher education. Washington, DC: ERIC/Higher Education Research. ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7.
  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood, what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Braun, R. L., & Stallworth, H. L. (2009). The academic honesty expectations gap: An analysis of student and faculty perceptions. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 19, 127–141.
  • Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Prevalence of and penalties for academic dishonesty: Perceptions of Australian accounting students. AFAANZ Conference Proceedings, 3–5 July, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42, 1150–1152.
  • Clikeman, P., & Henning, S. (2000). The socialization of undergraduate accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 1–17.
  • Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249–253.
  • Conroy, S., & Emerson, T. L. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 383–396.
  • Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.
  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.
  • Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.
  • Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(11), 855–862.
  • Deshpande, S. (1997). Managers’ perception of proper ethical conduct: The effect of sex, age, and level of education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 79–85.
  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.
  • Fagerland, M. W., & Sandvik, L. (2009). The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 1487–1497.
  • Fogarty, T. J., & Black, W. H. (2014). Further tales of the schism: US accounting faculty and practice credentials. Journal of Accounting Education, 32(3), 223–237.
  • Folse, K. (1991). Ethics and the profession: Graduate student training. Teaching Sociology, 19(3), 344–350.
  • Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 205–221.
  • Forsyth, P. B., & Danisiewicz, T. J. (1985). Toward a theory of professionalization. Work and Occupations, 12(1), 59–76.
  • Forte, A. (2004). Business ethics: A study of the moral reasoning of selected business managers and the influence of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 167–173.
  • Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.
  • Gibson, C., & Schroeder, N. (1998). The changing face of accounting faculties. Review of Business, 19(2), 16–20.
  • Gibson, C. L., Khey, D., & Schreck, C. J. (2008). Gender, internal controls, and academic dishonesty: Investigating mediating and differential effects. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19(1), 2–18.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gregoire, T. G., & Driver, B. L. (1987). Analysis of ordinal data to detect population differences. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 159–165.
  • Hasselback, J. R. (2004). 2004–2005 accounting faculty directory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kamath, R. K., Meier, H. H., & Thomas, E. G. (2011). Characteristics of accounting faculty in the U.S. American Journal of Business Education, 2(3), 1–8.
  • Keenan, C., Brown, G., Pontell, H., & Geis, G. (1985). Medical students’ attitudes on physical fraud and abuse in the medicare and medicaid programs. Journal of Medical Education, 60(3), 167–173.
  • Killingsworth, R., & Twale, D. (1993). Integrating ethics into technical curricula. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 1290(1), 58–69.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development, Vol. I: The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
  • Kohut, G. F., & Corriher, S. E. (1994). The relationship of age, gender, experience and awareness of written ethics policies to business decision making. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 59(1), 32–39.
  • Kristiansen, C., & Hotte, A. (1996). Morality and the self: Implications for the when and how of value-attitude-behavior relations. In Clive Seligman, James Olsen, & Mark Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (pp. 77–105, vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kuh, G. D., & Whitt, E. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry. Culture in American Colleges and Universities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education, Report No. 1, 1988. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Dept. E, One Depont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
  • Kujala, J., & Pietiläinen, T. (2004). Female managers’ ethical decision-making: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 153–163.
  • Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate should be: The role of sex, academic status, and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205–217.
  • Luthar, H., & Karri, R. (2005). Exposure to ethics education and the perception of linkage between organizational ethical behavior and business outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 353–368.
  • MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.
  • Marques, A. P., & Azevedo-Pereira, J. (2009). Ethical ideology and ethical judgments in the Portuguese accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 227–242.
  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.
  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
  • McNichols, C. W., & Zimmerer, T. W. (1985). Situational ethics: An empirical study of differentiators of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(3), 175–180.
  • Page, G. (2004). Professional socialization of valuation students: What the literature says. Paper presented at the proceedings 10th Pacific Rim real estate society conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 25–28 January 2004.
  • Preston, C., & Colman, A. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15.
  • Rhodes, C. (1996). Researching organisational change and learning: A narrative approach. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1–8.
  • Robbins, C. A., & Martin, S. S. (1993). Gender, styles of deviance, and drinking problems. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(4), 302–321.
  • Ruegger, D., & King, E. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.
  • Schein, E. G. (1967). Attitude change during management education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(4), 601–628.
  • Shafer, W., Morris, R., & Ketchand, A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical decisions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 254–277.
  • Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. (2003). The other side of academic dishonesty: The relationship between faculty scepticism, gender and strategies for managing student academic dishonesty cases. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 193–207.
  • Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 117–135.
  • Smith, A., & Rogers, V. (2000). Ethics-related responses to specific situation vignettes: Evidence of sex-based differences and occupational socialization. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 73–85.
  • Stedham, Y., Yamamura, J. H., & Beekun, R. I. (2007). Gender differences in business ethics: Justice and relativist perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(2), 163–174.
  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29(5), 531–543.
  • Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.
  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 28, No. 3. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Whitley Jr., B. E., Bichlmeier Nelson, A., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Sex differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41(9/10), 657–680.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.