Building a market simulation to teach business process analysis: effects of realism on engaged learning

References

• AACSB. (2016). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for accounting accreditation. Retrieved from AACSB International: http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/standards/accountingstds_2013_update-3oct_final.ashx?la=en
   Google Scholar
• Apostolou, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M., & Watson, S. F. (2013). Accounting education literature review (2010–2012). Journal of Accounting Education, 31(2), 107–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2013.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). An exploratory study of the effects of gender on student learning and class participation in an internet-based MBA course. Management Learning, 31(4), 503–519. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/209864562?accountid=14584 doi: 10.1177/1350507600314006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Create excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Buckless, F. A., Krawczyk, K., & Showalter, D. S. (2014). Using virtual worlds to simulate real-world audit procedures. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(3), 389–417. doi: 10.2308/iace-50785
   Google Scholar
• Canada, K., & Bruscha, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Education Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 43–51. doi: 10.1007/BF02298153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. (2006). A research study on students’ level of acceptance in applying e-learning for business course: A case study on a technical college in Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, T. C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670–686. doi: 10.1108/03090591211255539
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Weber, J., & Zambrano, R. (2014). Teaching business ethics online: Perspectives on course design, delivery, student engagement, and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 513–529. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1932-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211. doi: 10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, P., Suwardy, T., & Mavondo, F. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: Determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education, 12(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/0963928032000064567
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, D., & Brown, F. W. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills – the benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(6), 330–336. doi: 10.1108/03090590010373316
   Google Scholar
• Eschenbrenner, B., Nah, F., & Siau, K. (2008). 3-D virtual worlds in education: Applications, benefits, issues, and opportunities. Journal of Database Management, 19(4), 91–110. doi: 10.4018/jdm.2008100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., & Miao, Y. (2012). Effect of electronic word-of-mouth on consumer purchase intention: The perspective of gender differences. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 10(3), 175–181. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1240355575?accountid=14584
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76–88. doi: 10.4018/irmj.2007070106
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in online versus face to face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 141–154. doi: 10.28945/1633
   Google Scholar
• He, F., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2007). Decision factors for the adoption of an online payment system by customers. International Journal of E-Business Research, 3(4), 1–11, 13, 15–16, 18–32. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/222329448?accountid=14584 doi: 10.4018/jebr.2007100101
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, S., & Thornburg, S. (2010). Really engaging accounting: Second Life as a learning platform. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(3), 361–378. doi: 10.2308/iace.2010.25.3.361
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat, M. R. M., & Faqih, K. M. S. (2014). Investigating the moderating effects of gender and self-efficacy in the context of mobile payment adoption: A developing country perspective. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 147–169. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1629701501?accountid=14584 doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v9n11p147
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, D. (2002). Strategic management: An evaluation of the use of three learning methods. Journal of Management Development, 21(9), 655–665. doi: 10.1108/02621710210441658
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997). Motives, hurdles and dropouts. Communications of the ACM, 40(4), 97–102. doi: 10.1145/248448.248464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbourne, W., & Weeks, S. (1997). A socio-economic perspective on gender bias in technology. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(1), 243–260. doi: 10.1016/S1053-5357(97)90018-4
   Google Scholar
• Landry, R. M. Jr. (1997). Computer usage and psychological type characteristics in accounting students. Journal of Accounting and Computers, 12(4), 360.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Lee, S. (2010). Internet vs mobile services: Comparisons of gender and ethnicity. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4(4), 346–375. doi: 10.1108/17505931011092835
   Google Scholar
• Levant, Y., Coulmont, M., & Sandu, R. (2016). Business simulation as an active learning activity for developing soft skills. Accounting Education, 25(4), 368–395. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2016.1191272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Franklin, T., Shelor, R., Ozercan, S., Reuter, J., Ye, E., & Moriarty, S. (2011). A learning game for youth financial literacy education in the teen grid of Second Life three-dimensional virtual environment. American Journal of Business Education, 4(7), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• López Gavira, R., & Omoteso, K. (2013). Perceptions of the usefulness of virtual learning environments in accounting education: A comparative evaluation of undergraduate accounting students in Spain and England. Accounting Education, 22(5), 445–466. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.814476
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, N. (2004). Using computerized business simulations and spreadsheet models in accounting education: A case study. Accounting Education, 13(suppl. 1), 55–70. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000310797
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Savage, A. (2009). Vouch and trace: A revenue recognition audit simulation. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(1), 93–103. doi: 10.2308/iace.2009.24.1.93
   Google Scholar
• Mims-Word, M. (2012). The importance of technology usage in the classroom, does gender gaps exist. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), 5(4), 271. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1418450487?accountid=14584 doi: 10.19030/cier.v5i4.7271
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. (2009). Using an online homework system to submit accounting homework: Role of cognitive need, computer efficacy and perception. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 263–268. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.263-268
   Google Scholar
• Perera, L., & Richardson, P. (2010). Students’ use of online academic resources within a course web site and its relationship with their course performance: An exploratory study. Accounting Education, 19(6), 587–600. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2010.529639
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. E., & Graeff, T. R. (2014). Using an in-class simulation in the first accounting class: Moving from surface to deep learning. Journal of Education for Business, 89(5), 241–247. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2013.863751
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2015). Data driven: What students need to succeed in a rapidly changing business world [White paper]. Retrieved from PricewaterhouseCoopers: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/faculty-resource/assets/pwc-data-driven-paper-feb2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rollag, K., & Parise, S. (2005). The Bikestuff simulation: Experiencing the challenge of organizational change. Journal of Management Education, 29(5), 769–787. doi: 10.1177/1052562904271571
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Josse-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Taoge, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions on incorporating E-learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C., & Ip, R. (2009). Action learning with Second Life – A pilot study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 249–258.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. C., & Page, R. A. (2011). Marketing to the generations. Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. H., & Chen, C. M. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108–121. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynder, M. (2004). Facilitating creativity in management accounting: A computerized business simulation. Accounting Education, 13(2), 231–250. doi: 10.1080/09639280410001676639
   Google Scholar
• Yates, S. J. (2001). Gender, language and CMC for education. Learning and Instruction, 11(1), 21–34. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00012-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar