UK PhD assessment in accounting and finance: social capital in action

References

• Araujo, E. R. (2005). Understanding the PhD as a phase in time. Time & Society, 14(2/3), 191–211. doi: 10.1177/0961463X05055133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barash, D. (2003). The survival game: How game theory explains the biology of cooperation and competition. New York, NY: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2012). Today’s Ph.D. students – is there a future generation of accounting academics or are they a dying breed? (A UK Perspective. ICAS Report). Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., Hudson, J., den Outer, J., & Price, M. (2015). External peer review of assessment: An effective approach to verifying standards? Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1069–1082. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2015.1024629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & Price, M. (2015). External examining: Fit for purpose? Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 195–211. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.823931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 242–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breimer, L. H., & Nilsson, T. K. (2014). Considerations for appointing an external examiner of a PhD in the biomedical sciences in Sweden: A questionnaire-based survey. Scientometrics, 98, 2039–2049. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1150-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (2008). Examining the doctoral thesis: A discussion. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 365–374. doi: 10.1080/14703290802377208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanueva, C., & Larrinaga, C. (2013). The (uncertain) invisible college of Spanish accounting scholars. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 19–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, G. (2013). Developments in doctoral assessment in the UK. In M. Kompf & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Chapter 3 in Critical issues in higher education, critical issues in the future of learning and teaching (8). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 111–139. doi: 10.1086/227835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94( Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structures), 95–120. doi: 10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. (2011). The doctoral viva voce as a cultural practice: The gendered production of academic subjects. Gender and Education, 23(3), 313–329. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2010.508453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denicolo, P. (2003). Assessing the PhD: A constructive view of criteria. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 84–91. doi: 10.1108/09684880310471506
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, Y., & Kets, W. (2014). Ranking friends. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 107(Part A), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2010). Social capital (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, E. (2013, April 25). Whim and rigour. Times Higher Education, pp. 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Green, H. (2008). United Kingdom. In M. Nerad & M. Heggelund (Eds.), Chapter 2 in towards a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haag, M., & Lagunoff, R. (2006). Social norms, local interaction, and neighbourhood planning. International Economic Review, 47(1), 265–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2006). On being an external examiner. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1080/03075070500392300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behaviour as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606. doi: 10.1086/222355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. O., Rodriguez-Barraquer, T., & Tan, X. (2012). Social capital and social quilts: Network patterns of favour exchange. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1857–1897. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.5.1857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., & Tinkler, P. (2001). Back to basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD viva. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 355–366. doi: 10.1080/02602930120063501
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, R., & Quattrone, P. (2008). The governance of accounting academic: Issues for debate. European Accounting Review, 17(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1080/09638180801971913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (2014). Assessment procedures of Norwegian PhD theses as viewed by examiners from the USA, the UK and Sweden. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 140–153. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.798395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loumansky, A., & Jackson, S. (2004). Out of the frying pan into the viva. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies, the search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L., Leonard, D., & David, M. (2002). Variations in vivas: Quality and equality in British PhD assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 263–273. doi: 10.1080/03075070220000653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L., Leonard, D., & David, M. (2003). Quality and equality in British PhD assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 64–72. doi: 10.1108/09684880310471489
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2003). Levelling the playing field: Towards best practice in the doctoral viva. Higher Education Review, 36(1), 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L., & Guthrie, J. (2010). Business schools in the age of globalisation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1108/09513571011010583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E.M. (1994). Quality in the PhD. Points at which quality may be assessed. In R. G. Burgess (Ed.), Chapter 7 of Postgraduate education and training in the social sciences: Processes and products. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S., & Green, H. (2007). The doctorate worldwide. Maidenhead: Open University Press. The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28, 1–20. doi: 10.1017/S1049096500058856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. (2011). The UK quality code for higher education part B. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/assuring-standards-and-quality/the-quality-code/quality-code-part-b
   Google Scholar
• QAA. (2015). Doctoral degree characteristics statement. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Doctoral-Degree-Characteristics-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J, & Urquhart, V. (2018). Accounting and finance in UK universities: Academic labour, shortages and strategies. Working paper. University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Twale, D. J., & De Luca, B. M. (2008). Faculty incivility. The rise of the academic bully culture and what to do about it. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. (2003). Figuratively speaking: Six accounts of the PhD viva. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 100–108. doi: 10.1108/09684880310471524
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J. (2010). Supporting students’ preparation for the viva: Their pre-conceptions and implications for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 71–84. doi: 10.1080/13562510903487867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar