Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants

References

• Abbott, J., & Palatnik, B. (2018). Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: Implications for instructors. Accounting Education, 27(1), 72–93. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1381032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisbitt, S., & Sangster, A. (2005). Using internet-based online assessment: A case study. Accounting Education, 14(4), 383–394. doi: 10.1080/06939280500346011
   Google Scholar
• Al-Htaybat, K., Alberti-Alhtayat, L., & Alhatabat, Z. (2018). Education digital natives for the future: Accounting educators’ evaluation of the accounting. Accounting Education. doi: 10.1080/09639284-2018.1437758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, R, & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 187–198. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620019
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C., & Logan, L. (2006). Using action research to promote increased academic success for educationally disadvantaged students. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 3(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, E. (2009). Mutual feedback in e-portfolio assessment: An approach to the netfolio system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 342–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00803.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence . British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukes, B., Kirstein, M., Kunz, R., & Nagel, L. (2017). Innovators to laggards- how South African students adopted and perceived technologically enhanced learning. Accounting Education. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1417875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Baldwin-Morgan, A., & Sangster, A. (1995). Expert systems in accounting education – a literature guide . Accounting Education, 4(30), 283–296. doi: 10.1080/09639289500000034
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, M., Morgan, T., & Qayyum, A. (2011). Digital learners in higher education: Generation is not the issue. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Falmer: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: Key factors associated with the test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593–602. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, S. (2013). The study skills handbook. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C., Gross, H., & Dymott, R. (2006). Assessment relationships in higher education: The tension of process and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 95–114. doi: 10.1080/01411920500402037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, J., Healy, M., McCutcheon, M., & O’Callaghan, S. (2011). Adapting case-based teaching to large class settings: An action research approach. Accounting Education, 20(3), 245–263. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.583742
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (1998). Objective tests, learning to learn and learning styles: A comment. Accounting Education, 7(4), 335–345. doi: 10.1080/096392898331117
   Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K., & Pryor, J. (2003). ‘Learning careers’ or ‘Assessment careers’? The impact of assessment systems on learning. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 471–488. doi: 10.1080/01411920301849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einig, S. (2013). Supportive students’ learning: The use of formative assessments. Accounting Education, 22(5), 425–444. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.803868
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. doi: 10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, B., Garcia, I., & Escofet, A. (2012). Beyond the net generation debate: A comparison of digital learners in face-to-face and virtual universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 190–210. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1305
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. doi: 10.1080/01411920902989227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (1997). What is action research? Retrieved from www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arr/arow/rintro.html
   Google Scholar
• Jebeile, S., & Abeysekera, I. (2010). The spread of ICT innovation in accounting education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 158–168.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2007). Effective practice with e-assessment: An overview of technologies, policies and practice in further and higher education. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk/assessresource
   Google Scholar
• Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2010). Effective assessment in a digital age. Retrieved from www.jisc.ac.uk/assessresource
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education, 54(3), 722–732. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2000). Reflective teaching and learning in the health professions: Action research in professional education. Oxford: Blackwell Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kember, D., & Young, D. (2006). Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 185–198. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students’ attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274. doi: 10.1080/03075070500095689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (1986). The effects of past computer experience on computerized aptitude test performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 727–733. doi: 10.1177/0013164486463030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litherland, K., Carmichael, P., & Martinez-Garcia, A. (2013). Ontology-based e-assessment for accounting education. Accounting Education, 22(5), 498–501. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.824198
   Google Scholar
• Loewenberger, P., & Bull, J. (2003). Cost-effectiveness analysis of computer-based assessment. Research in Learning Technology, 11(2), 23–45. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v11i2.11275
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, P. (2009). Students’ evaluation of the use of online summative assessment on an undergraduate financial accounting module. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 237–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00924.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, P., & Lau, A. (2008). The use of on-line summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course. Journal of Accounting Education, 26, 73–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, P., & Teoh, L. (2012a). ICT for assessment and feedback on undergraduate accounting modules. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/finance-and-accounting/using-ICT-in-assessment-and-feedback
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, P., & Teoh, L. (2012b). Computer-based assessment and feedback: Best practice guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/disciplines/finance_and_accounting/Computer-basedassessmentfeedbackBestPractice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Massoudi, D., Koh, S., Hancock, P., & Fung, L. (2017). The effectiveness of usage of online multiple choice questions on student performance in introductory accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(4), 1–17. doi: 10.2308/iace-51722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, A. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39, 299–312. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. (1988). Action research- principles and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihret, D., Abayadeera, N., Watty, K., & McKay, J. (2017). Teaching auditing using cases in an online learning environment: The role of ePortfolio assessment. Accounting Education, 26(4), 335–357. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1292466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., Charity, I., & Robson, A. (2016). Students’ perceptions of computer-based learning environments, their attitude towards business statistics, and their academic achievement: Implications from a UK university. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 734–755. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.950562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’connell, B., Ferguson, C., De Lange, P., Howieson, B., Watty, K., Carr, R., … Milton, A. (2010). Enhancing assessment feedback: Practices in accounting education: Issues, obstacles and reforms. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/project-enhancing-assessment-feedback-practices-jcu-2007
   Google Scholar
• Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. (2003). Developing research awareness in students: An action research project explored. Accounting Education, 12(3), 283–302. doi: 10.1080/0963928032000138295
   Google Scholar
• Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. (2004). An analysis of accounting education research in accounting education: An international journal – 1992–2001. Accounting Education, 13(1), 69–99. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000207396
   Google Scholar
• Pincus, K., Stout, D., Sorensen, J., Stocks, K., & Lawson, R. (2017). Forces for change in higher education and implications for the accounting academy. Journal of Accounting Education, 40, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Potter, B., & Johnston, C. (2006). The effect of interactive on-line learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 24, 16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Powers, E. (1999). Test anxiety and test performance: Comparing paper-based and computer-adaptive versions of the GRE general test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. (2009). Academic credit in higher education in England- an introduction. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from www.qaa.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Race, P. (2005). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L., Pinho, C., Bugarim, M., Craig, R., & Machado, D. (2018). Factors affecting success in the professional entry exam for accountants in Brazil. Accounting Education, 27(1), 48–71. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2017.1361851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, A., & Wood, L. (2008). Student perceptions and perceptions for feedback. Asian Social Science, 4(3), 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 231–240. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063819
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. (1992). Computer-based instruction in accounting education. Accounting Education, 1(1), 13–32. doi: 10.1080/09639289200000003
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. (1995). The integration of expert systems within the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education, 4(3), 211–216. doi: 10.1080/09639289500000025
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A. (1996). Objective tests, learning to learn and learining styles. Accounting Education, 5(1), 131–146. doi: 10.1080/09639289600000015
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., & Lymer, A. (1998). How to survive a new educational era. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(4), 1095–1109.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., & McCombie, I. (1993). How well do accountancy students understand a set of accounts? Accounting Education: An International Journal, 2(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1080/09639289300000005
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., & Mulligan, C. (1997). Integrating the World Wide Web into an accounting systems course. Accounting Education, 6(1), 53–62. doi: 10.1080/096392897331631
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., & Wilson, R. (1991). Knowledge-based learning within the accounting curriculum. The British Accounting Review , 23, 243–261. doi: 10.1016/0890-8389(91)90087-I
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. London, UK: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Simin, S., & Heidari, A. (2013). Computer-based assessment: Pros and cons. Educational Technology, 55, 12732–12734.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Kirsch, I., Eignor, D., & Jamieson, J. (1999). Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks. Language Learning, 49(2), 219–274. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. (2000). Computer-based assessment: A versatile educational tool. Computer & Education, 34, 37–49. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. doi: 10.1002/berj.3215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615–631. doi: 10.1080/01411920120095780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kleij, F., Feskens, R., & Eggen, T. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511. doi: 10.3102/0034654314564881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L. (2009). E-assessment: Its impplementation and impact on learning outcomes. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1(1), 50–61. doi: 10.1108/17581184200900005
   Google Scholar