Threshold concepts and ESG performance: teaching accounting students reconceptualized fundamentals to drive future ESG advocacy

References

• AACSB. (2021). AACSB Business Accreditation Standards. Available at: https://aacsb.edu/educators/accreditation/business-accreditation/aacsb-business-accrediation-standards
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. A. (2017). Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 906–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C. A., Heijltjes, M. G., Gavin, J., Marjorbanks, T., & Powell, M. (2011). The development of leaders able to respond to climate change and sustainability challenges. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021111162191
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S. (2016). 2015 presidential address: Our teaching mission. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon-Correa, J. A., Marcus, A. A., Rivera, J. E., & Kenworthy, A. L. (2017). Sustainability management teaching resources and the challenge of balancing planet, people and profits. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1973). Social responsibility and economic efficiency. Public Policy, 21(3), 303–317.
   Google Scholar
• Audebrand, L. K., Camus, A., & Michaud, V. (2017). A mosquito in the classroom: Using the cooperative business model to foster paradoxical thinking in management education. Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 216–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baden, D., & Higgs, M. (2015). Challenging the perceived wisdom of management theories and practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(4), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2014.0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagley, C. E., Sulkowski, A. J., Nelson, J. S., Waddock, S., & Shrivastava, P. (2020). A path to developing more insightful business school graduates: A systems-based, experimental approach to integrating law, strategy, and sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(4), 541–568. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, P. (2013). Accountants will save the world. Harvard Business Review, available at: https://hbr.org/2013/03/accountants-will-save-the-world
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Gray, R., Hibbit, C., & Kirk, E. (2001). Full cost accounting: An agenda for action. ACCA Research Report 73.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., & Thomson, I. (2001). Commentary on: Some thoughts on social and environmental accounting education. Accounting Education, 10(4), 353–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280210121141
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability. 2nd edition. London: Routledge. 1–300.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S., Huges, E. C., Geer, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, L. L. (2013). Self-regulated learning interventions in the introductory accounting course: An empirical study. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(3), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50444
   Google Scholar
• Bénabou, J., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Beusch, P. (2014). Towards sustainable capitalism in the development of higher business school education. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(5), 523–545.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, R., & Davis-Nozemack, K. (2018). Tax avoidance as a sustainability problem. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1009–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3162-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, J. S., & Paine, L. S. (2017). The error at the heart of corporate leadership. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, G., Narayanan, V., Greer, S., & Blair, B. (2019). Taking the pulse of accounting education reform: Liberal education, sociological perspectives, and exploring ways forward. Accounting Education, 28(3), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1586552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgman, T., McLaughlin, C., & Cummings, S. (2018). Overcoming the problem with solving business problems: Using theory differently to rejuvenate the case method for turbulent times. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada Business Corporations Act (2020). R.S.C., 1985, c. C-44, s. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-44/
   Google Scholar
• Chabrak, N., & Craig, R. (2013). Student imaginings, cognitive dissonance, and critical thinking. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassagnon, V., & Hollandts, X. (2014). Who are the owners of the firm: Shareholders, employees or no one? Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137413000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate Bond Initiative. (2019). Climate Bonds Standard. Version 3.0. International best practice for labelling green investments. Climate Bonds Initiative, December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3(October), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collison, D., Ferguson, J., & Stevenson, L. (2014). Sustainability accounting and education. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 30–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, M. (2020). Externalities and the common owner. Washington Law Review, 95(1), 1–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2006). Modelling the firm in its market and organizational environment: Methodologies for studying corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 27(10), 1533–1551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Canella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datar, S. M., Garvin, D. A., & Cullen, P. G. (2010). Rethinking the MBA: Business education at a crossroads. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., & Mangan, J. (2006). Embedding threshold concepts: From theory to pedagogical principles to learning activities. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines Symposium, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, T. J., & Pacheco, D. F. (2017). Saving the commons: A behavioral simulation for experiencing the role of collaboration and trust in devising workable solutions to environmental and other social issues. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(3), 493–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within critical perspectives of accounting : Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deer, S., & Zarestky, J. (2017). Balancing profit and people: Corporate social responsibility in business education. Journal of Management Education, 41(5), 727–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers, C., & Maroun, W. (2018). Introduction to sustainability accounting and integrated reporting. In C. De Villiers, & W. Maroun (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, J. (1999). Is shareholder wealth maximization immoral? Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2301
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, P. (2017). A threshold concept in managing: What students in introductory management courses must know. Journal of Management Education, 41(6), 835–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyball, M. C., & Thomson, I. (2013). Sustainability and accounting education. Accounting Education, 22(4), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.817787
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., & Youmans, T. (2016). Materiality in corporate governance: The statement of significant audiences and materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• EQUIS (2021). Standards & Criteria. EQUIS, available at: https://www.efmdglobal.org/wp-content/u;pads/2021_EQUIS_Standards_and_Criteria.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J. (2013). A commentary on ‘corporate responsibility to respect human rights and business schools’ responsibility to teach It.’. Accounting Education, 22(4), 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.817792
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischman, R. K., & Schuele, K. (2006). Green accounting: A primer. Journal of Accounting Education, 24(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Osterblom, H., Jouffray, J., et al. (2019). Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(10), 1396–1403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0978-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A. (2018). The manufacture of the academic accountant. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 57, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September.
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell, G. E., & Dooley, R. S. (1997). Saving the commons: A behavioral simulation for experiencing the role of collaboration and trust in devising workable solutions to environmental and other social issues. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Supplement, 2, 149–183.
   Google Scholar
• Gehman, J., & Grimes, M. (2017). Hidden badge of honor: How contextual distinctiveness affects category promotion among certified B corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2294–2320. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacalone, R. A., & Thompson, K. R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.22697016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2013). Sustainability + accounting education: The elephant in the classroom. Accounting Education, 22(4), 308–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2013.817795
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., & Collison, D. (2002). Can’t see the wood for the trees, can’t see the trees for the numbers? Accounting education, sustainability and the public interest. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(5), 797–836. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2002.0554
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). On the 2019 business roundtable “statement on the purpose of a corporation”. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1223–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319892669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., & Van der Laan Smith, J. (2015). Responsible accounting for stakeholders. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 935–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. & Zingales, L. (2017). Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 2 (2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1561/108.00000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, R., & Eagle, L. (2020). Impact of integrated sustainability content into undergraduate business education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2019-0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelton, J., & Haigh, M. (2010). Incorporating sustainability into accounting curricula: Lessons learnt from an action research study. Accounting Education, 19(1-2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802044451
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, D. P. (2010). Review of The story of stuff. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 553–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselbarth, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Educating change agents for sustainability – learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, P., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2015). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeyman, R., & Jana, T. (2019). The B corp handbook. How you can use business as a force for good. Second edition. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X. B., & Watson, L. (2015). Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASB. (2013). ISAE 3000 (Revised). Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IFAC. (2016). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Snapshot of the Accountancy Profession's Contribution. Available at: https://www.ifac.org/knowledge-gateway/developing-accountancy-profession/publications/2030-agenda-sustainable-development
   Google Scholar
• IFRS Foundation (2021). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. 1.2 Objective, usefulness and limitations of general purpose financial reporting. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework/#standard
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00158
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. (2011). Facing up to social cost: The real meaning of corporate social responsibility. Griffith Law Review, 20(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854696
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. (1996). Accounting for biodiversity: A pilot study. The British Accounting Review, 28(4), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1996.0019
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. (2010). Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting. Accounting Forum, 34(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., & Li, Y. (2016). What is corporate sustainability and how do firms practice it? A management accounting research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keels, J. K., & Sheehan, N. T. (2012). Jensen pharma: A governance role play. IMA Educational Case Journal, 5(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., & Pitelis, C. N. (2012). Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2021). Global minimum tax: an easy fix? Exploring the impacts of a global minimum tax regime. Available at: https:home.kpmg/ss/en/home/insights/2021/05/global-minimum-tax-an-easy-fix.html
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Scobie, M., Sorola, M., & Tregidga, H. (2020). Special issue editorial: Social and environmental account/ability 2020 and beyond. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 40(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1733631
   Google Scholar
• Lämsä, A.-M., Vehkaperä, M., Puttonen, T., & Pesonen, H.-L. (2008). Effect of business education on women and Men students’ attitudes on corporate responsibility in society. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9561-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F., & Baillie, C. (2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W., & Hopkins, M. (2015). GM’s stock buyback is bad for America and the company. Harvard Business Review. March.
   Google Scholar
• Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/030851400360541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. E., Birkey, R. N., & Patten, D. M. (2017). Exposing students to environmental sustainability in accounting: An analysis of its impacts in a US setting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2016.1270225
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., Gavin, J., & Ambrosini, V. (2018). A critical diversity framework to better educate students about strategy implementation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littan, S. (2019). The COSO internal control framework and sustainability reporting. The CPA Journal, 89, 22-26.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2006). Threshold concepts in introductory accounting. In Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. New York, 148‒159.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & McGahan, A. M. (2007). The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127006074160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., & Krause, D. (2016). Theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain management: Assessing what we know, exploring where to go. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. (2017). Who’s responsible for irresponsible business? An assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, C. (2018). The future of the corporation: Towards humane business. Journal of the British Academy, 6, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006s1.001
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A., Siegal, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications*. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. (2017). Management control systems, 4th ed. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning – ten years on (pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millon, D. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability. In B. Sjåfjell, & B. J. Richardson (Eds.), Company law and sustainability: Legal barriers and opportunities (pp. 35–78). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 797–806. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10257
   Google Scholar
• NYTimes. (2021). Global deal to end tax havens moves ahead as nations back 15% rate. New York Times, October 8, 2021, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/08/business/oecd-global-minimum-tax.html
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2020). Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: Researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(5), 1113–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2020-4445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). International community strikes a ground-breaking tax deal for the digital age. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: https://oecd.org/tax/ international-community-strikes-a-ground-breaking-tax-deal-for-the-digital-age.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ondack, D. A. (1975). Socialization in professional schools: A comparative study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. (2018). Why we should bulldoze the business school. The Guardian, April 27, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/27/bulldoze-the-business-school
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S., Gamble, E., Moroz, P., & Branzei, O. (2019). The impact of B Lab certification on firm growth. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2017.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. M., & Raiborn, C. A. (2018). Aggressive tax avoidance: A conundrum for stakeholders, governments, and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2978-5
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, G. (2012). Managers should serve the interests of companies, not shareholders. The Guardian, (March 26, 2012). https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/gary-hamel-what-matters-now
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, F. (1998). Accounting students’ beliefs about knowledge: Associating performance with underlying belief dimensions. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(1), 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, M. E. (2009). End shareholder value tyranny: Put the corporation first. Strategy & Leadership, 37(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570910926007
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, J. (2006). The new rigor: Beyond the right answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.22697024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. (2017). The toxics release inventory (TRI) and online database resources. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(3), 497–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & O’Brien, P. C. (2020). Financial accounting theory. Eighth. Pearson Canada Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, U., & Kelly, M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of education for sustainable development in the accounting and business curriculum at a business school in New Zealand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(2), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2012-0042
   Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/258961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (2020). Performance measurement & control systems for implementing strategy. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sjåfjell, B. (2018). Beyond climate risk: Integrating sustainability into the duties of the corporate board. Deakin Law Review, 23, 41–62. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjåfjell, B., Johnston, A., Anker-Sørensen, L., & Millon, D. (2015). Shareholder primacy: The main barrier to sustainable companies. In B. Sjåfjell, & B. J. Richardson (Eds.), Company law and sustainability: Legal barriers and opportunities (pp. 79–147). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. C., & Rönnegard, D. (2014). Shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, and the role of business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2427-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneirson, J. F. (2009). Green is good: Sustainability, profitability, and a new paradigm for corporate governance. Iowa Law Review, 94, 987–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneirson, J. F. (2015). Shareholder primacy and corporate compliance. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 26(3), 450–473.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, L. (2012). The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations and the public. Barrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Teaching sustainability to business students: Shifting mindsets. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810885844
   Google Scholar
• Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2004). It doesn’t matter what you teach? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(4-5), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00049-2
   Google Scholar
• Threlfall, R., King, A., Shulman, J., & Bartels, W. (2020). The time has come. The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. KPMG Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Trucost. (2011). Universal ownership: why externalities matter to institutional investors, PRI and UNEP-FI. Available at: http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/Universal_ownership_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Companies Act (2006). C.46 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2018). Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities. Accounting and Business Research, 48(5), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1470155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & Chapman, C. (2014). Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Principles for Responsible Management Education. (2007). Available at: http://www.unprme.org/resource-docs/SDGBrochurePrint.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN Sustainable Development Goals. (2015). Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.32.4.13h7x81187mh8km8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyness, L., & Dalton, F. (2018). The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives. Journal of Accounting Education, 45, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Yip, J., & Raelin, J. A. (2011). Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning, 43(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611422476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen, M., & Laine, M. (2015). For logistical reasons only? A case study of tax planning and corporate social responsibility reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York, J. (2021). Green to gone. Regional institutional logics and firm survival in moral markets. Presentation. Strategy, Entrepreneurship, and Management Speaker Series. University of Alberta School of Business.
   Google Scholar