Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints

References

• Allison , G. and Zelkow , P. 1999 . Essence of decision: explaining the Cuban missile crisis , New York : Addison Wesley Longman .
   Google Scholar
• BMI . 2000 . Moderner Staat - moderne Verwaltung : Gemeinsame Geschäftsordnung der Bundesministerien , Berlin : German Federal Ministry of the Interior / Bundesministerium des Innern .
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanor V Joined-up government Oxford University Press Oxford 2005
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer M Social research and royal commissions George Allen & Unwin London 1980
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office . 1999 . Modernising government (Cmnd. 4310) , London : HMSO .
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office . 2003 . Regulatory impact assessment guidance , London : HMSO .
   Google Scholar
• Clemens , E. S. and Cook , J. M. 1999 . Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change . Annual review of sociology , 25 : 441 – 466 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2001 . European governance: a White Paper Brussels, 25 July 2001. COM(2001). 428 final
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2002a . Communication from the Commission on impact assessment Brussels. 5 June 2002. COM(2002). 276 final
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2002b . On the collection and use of expertise by the Commission: principles and guidelines: ‘Improving the knowledge base for better policies’ 713 COM(2002). 713, Brussels
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2005a . Impact assessment guidelines Brussels, 15 June 2005. SEC (2005). 791
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2005b . Better regulation for growth and jobs in the European Union Brussels, 16 March 2005. COM (2005). 97 final
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC) . 2006 . The Impact Assessment Board (IAB) – Mandate SEC (2006) 1457/3
   Google Scholar
• Dery , D. 1998 . Policy by the way: when policy is incidental to making other policies . Journal of public policy , 18 ( 2 ) : 163 – 176 .
   Google Scholar
• Eales , R. 2005 . Emerging approaches to integrated appraisal in the UK . Impact assessment and policy appraisal , 23 ( 2 ) : 113 – 123 .
   Google Scholar
• Eckerberg , K. 2007 . “ Institutional analysis of energy and agriculture ” . In Environmental policy integration in practice , Edited by: Nilsson , M. and Eckerberg , K. 111 – 136 . London : Earthscan .
   Google Scholar
• European Environment and Sustainable Development Advisory Councils (EEAC) . 2006 . Impact assessment of European Commission policies: achievements and prospects Statement of the EEAC Working Group on Governance, April 2006
   Google Scholar
• Fischer , F. 1995 . Evaluating public policy , Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg , B. 1998 . Rationality and power: democracy in practice , London : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gibson , R. B. 2005 . Sustainability assessment: criteria, processes and applications , London : Earthscan .
   Google Scholar
• Hall , P. A. 1993 . Policy paradigms, social learning and the state . Comparative politics , 25 ( 3 ) : 275 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall , P. A. and Taylor , R. C.R. 1996 . Political science and the three new institutionalisms . Political studies , XLIV : 936 – 957 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanf , K. and Underdal , A. 1998 . “ Domesticating international commitments: linking national and international decision-making ” . In The politics of international environmental management , Edited by: Underdal , A. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Hertin , J. 2008 . Rationalising the policy mess? Ex ante assessment and the utilisation of knowledge in the policy process . Environment and planning A , (in press)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill , M. 2005 . The public policy process , 4th edn , Longman : Harmondsworth .
   Google Scholar
• Hood , C. 2005 . “ The idea of joined up government: a historical perspective ” . In Joined up government , Edited by: Bogdanor , V. Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• John , P. 1998 . Analysing public policy , London : Pinter .
   Google Scholar
• Jordan , G. and Halpin , D. 2006 . The political costs of policy coherence: constructing a rural policy for Scotland . Journal of public policy , 26 ( 1 ) : 21 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Jordan , A. and Schout , A. 2006 . The coordination of the European Union: exploring the capacities for networked governance , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kidd , S. and Fischer , T. B. 2007 . Towards sustainability: is integrated appraisal a step in the right direction? . Environment and planning C: government and policy , 25 : 233 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser , L. and Ostrom , E. 1982 . “ The three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches ” . In Strategies of political inquiry , Edited by: Ostrom , E. 179 – 222 . Beverly Hills : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi , H. , Adam , S. and Jochum , M. 2006 . Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe . Journal of European public policy , 13 ( 3 ) : 341 – 361 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee , N. 2002 . “ Integrated approaches to impact assessment: substance or make-believe? ” . In In: Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2002 , Manchester : EIA Centre, University of Manchester .
   Google Scholar
• Lee , N. 2006 . Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment . Environmental impact assessment review , 26 : 57 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom , C. E. 1979 . Still muddling, not yet through . Public administration review , 39 ( 6 ) : 517 – 526 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March , J. G. and Olsen , J. P. 1989 . Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics , New York : The Free Press/Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (NAO) . 2006 . Regulatory impact assessments and sustainable development , London : NAO .
   Google Scholar
• Nutley , S. , Walter , I. and Bland , N. 2002 . The institutional arrangements for connecting evidence and policy: the case of drug misuse . Public policy and administration , 17 ( 3 ) : 76 – 94 .
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . 1996 . Performance auditing and the modernisation of government , Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . 2002 . Governance for sustainable development: five OECD case studies , Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom , E. 1990 . Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Owens , S. 2005 . Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , NS 30 : 287 – 292 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , B. G. 1998 . Comparative politics: theory and methods , London : Macmillan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Pope , J. 2006 . Editorial: what's so special about sustainability assessment? . Journal of environmental assessment policy and management , 8 ( 3 ) : v – x .
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli , C. M. and De Francesco , F. 2007 . Regulatory quality in Europe: concepts, measures and policy processes , Manchester : Manchester University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rayner , S. 2003 . Democracy in the age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision-making . Science and public policy , 30 ( 3 ) : 163 – 170 .
   Google Scholar
• Renda , A. 2006 . Impact assessment in the EU: the state of the art and the art of the state , Brussels : Centre for Policy Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Russel , D. J. 2005 . Environmental policy appraisal in the UK central government: a political analysis Thesis (PhD). University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
   Google Scholar
• Russel , D. and Jordan , A. 2007 . Gearing up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in United Kingdom central government . Journal of environmental planning and management , 50 : 1 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson , I. 2002 . Making sense of what works: evidence based policy making as instrumental rationality . Public policy and public administration , 17 ( 3 ) : 61 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Scrase , J. I. and Sheate , W. R. 2002 . Integration and integrated approaches to assessment: what do they mean for the environment? . Journal of environmental policy and planning , 4 : 275 – 294 .
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo S. Thelen K. Longstreth F Structuring politics: historical institutionalism in comparative analysis Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1992
   Google Scholar
• Weaver , P. M. and Rotmans , J. 2006 . Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it, and how? . International journal of innovation and sustainable development , 1 ( 4 ) : 284 – 303 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , D. The magic bullet? Is ex ante impact assessment the key to advancing environmental policy integration? Environmental policy integration . Paper 4. European Environment Agency . December .
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , D. 2004 . Sustainable development in the European Commission's integrated impact assessments for 2003. IEEP Final Report, April 2004 , London : Institute for European Environmental Policy .
   Google Scholar