Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process – a case study in Sweden

References

• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1974. “Factors Influencing Intention and the Intention–Behaviour Relation.” Human Relations 27: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonson H. 2008. “Landskap i infrastrukturplaneringen – styrdokumentens påverkan.” In Resande, planering och makt, (Travelling, planning and power) edited by M. Brusman, T. Friberg and J. Summerton, 105–120. Lund: Arkiv förlag (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Antonson, H. 2009. “Landscapes with History: Addressing Shortcomings in Swedish EIAs.” Land Use Policy 26 (3): 704–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonson, H. 2011. “The Treatment of Landscape in a Swedish EIA Process.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31 (3): 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonson, H., M. Gustafsson, and P. Angelstam. 2010. “Cultural Heritage Connectivity. A Tool for EIA in Transportation Infrastructure Planning.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15 (8): 463–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., and S. Schmidt. 2003. “Incentives, Morality or Habits? Predicting Students' Car Use for University Routes with the Model of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triadis.” Environment and Behavior 35: 264–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayne, E., J. Campbell, and S. Haché. 2012. “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Species? Evaluating Human Perceptions of Biodiversity Intactness Using Images of Cumulative Effects.” Ecological Indicators 20: 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., and G. Walker. 2001. “Participation Local Governance and Transport Planning.” Environment and Planning A 33: 431–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blicharska, M., K. Isaksson, T. Richardson, and C.-J. Wu. 2011. “Context Dependency and Stakeholder Involvement in EIA: The Decisive Role of Practitioners.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54: 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., J. Palerm, and P. Haigh. 2004. “Public Participation in EIA of Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Projects: A Case Study Analysis.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24: 617–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., L. Langstaff, R. Baxter, H-G. Wallentinus, J. Kofoed, K. Lisitzin, and S. Lundström. 2004. “Dealing with the Cultural Heritage Aspect of Environmental Impact Assessment in Europe.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 22 (1): 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and J. Teevan. 2005. “Chapter 13: Qualitative Data Analysis.” In Social Research Methods, 282–310. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byron, H.J., J.R. Treweek, W.R. Sheate, and S. Thompson. 2000. “Road Developments in the UK: An Analysis of Ecological Assessment in Environmental Impact Statements Produced between 1993 and 1997.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 (1): 71–97.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., and R. Kearns. 2010. “It's a Gestalt Experience”: Landscape Values and Development Pressure in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.” Geoforum 41: 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. ETS No. 176, 20.X.2000.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2011. “Parties of the Convention.” http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=176&CM=8&DF=&CL=ENG
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Communities. 1985. “Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment (85/337/EEC).” Official Journal of the European Communities C175: 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 1997. Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 Amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment.” Official Journal of the European Communities 40 (L73): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. 2010. “Wind Power Landscape and Strategic, Spatial Planning – The Construction of Acceptable Locations in Wales.” Land Use Policy 27: 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, M.A., and D.H. Anderson. 2005. “Getting From Sense of Place to Place-Based Management: An Interpretive Investigation of Place Meanings and Perceptions of Landscape Change.” Society and Natural Resources 18 (7): 625–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. 1997. “Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept?” Journal of Planning Literature 11 (3): 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• deLaval, S. 1998. Gåtur, metod för utvärdering (Touring Interviews a Method for Evaluation). Nordisk Arkitekturforskning, 4. (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., and Y. Howes. 2010. “Disruption to Place Attachment and the Protection of Restorative Environments: A Wind Energy Case Study.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (3): 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A.L. 1957. The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. New York: Dryden.
   Google Scholar
• Ellegård, K. 1996. “Reflections Over Routines in Time and Space – Actors, Interaction and Control in a Work Place Context.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Raum in der Sozialen Welt. Heft 2 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Åtgärdsprogram för bevarande av stora vattensalamandern och dess livsmiljöer (in Swedish). (Programme for the conservation of the Great Crested Newt and its life environment). Report No. 5636. Stockholm: CM-group.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2003. “Directive 2003/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 Providing for Public Participation. Council Directives 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC.” Official Journal of the European Communities L156: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2009. “Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Geological Storgae of Carbon Dioxide And Amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006.” Official Journal of the European Communities L140: 114–135.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L., and T. Rytwinski. 2009. “Effects of Roads on Animal Abundance: An Empirical Review and Synthesis.” Ecology and Society 14 (1):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, R.T.T., D. Sperling, J.A. Bissonette, A.P. Clevenger, C.D. Cutshall, V.H. Dale, L. Fahrig, et al. 2003. Road Ecology – Science and Solutions. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, G., M.S. Tveit, Å. Ode, and M.D. Velarde. 2009. “The Ecology of Visual Landscapes: Exploring the Conceptual Common Ground of Visual and Ecological Landscape Indicators.” Ecological Indicators 9: 933–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, G.T., and P.C. Stern. 2002. Environmental Problems and Human Behaviour. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gesler, W.M. 1992. “Therapeutic Landscapes: Medical Issues in Light of the New Cultural Geography.” Social Science and Medicine 34 (7): 735–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grahn, P., and U. Stigsdotter. 2003. “Landscape Planning and Stress.” In Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2, 1–18. München: Urban & Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, A.M., and L. Raulin. 2010. Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Habron, G.B., M.D. Kaplowitz, and R.L. Levine. 2004. “A Soft Systems Approach to Watershed Management: A Road Salt Case Study.” Environmental Management 33 (6): 776–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and W.A. Versteeg. 2005. “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7 (3): 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., R. Ready, S. Colombo, F. Watson, M. Stewart, and E.A. Bergmann. 2009. “The Impacts of Knowledge of the Past on Preferences for Future Landscape Change.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1404–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., and H. Staats. 2006. “The Need for Psychological Restoration as a Determinant of Environmental Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 26: 215–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, B.K., T.M. Koontz, and J.T. Bruskotter. 2012. “Volunteer Participation in Collaborative Watershed Partnerships: Insights from the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55 (1): 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldal, I. 2007. “Supporting Participation in Planning New Roads by Using Virtual Reality Systems.” Virtual Reality 11 (2–3): 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. 2009. “Historic Landscapes and the Recent Past: Whose History?” In Valuing Historic Environments, edited by L. Gibson and J. Pendlebury, 51–63. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, R.B., D. Richert, E. Seekamp, D. Robertson, and G.J. Buhyoff. 2003. “Understandings of Environmental Quality: Ambiguities and Values Held by Environmental Professionals.” Environmental Management 31 (1): 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., T. Richardson, and K. Olsson. 2009. “From Consultation to Deliberation? Tracing Deliberative Norms in EIA Frameworks in Swedish Roads Planning.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29 (5): 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., and M. Henningsson. 2011. “Social-Psychological Factors in Public Support for Local Biodiversity Conservation.” Society and Natural Resources 24: 717–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2007. “The European Landscape Convention and the Question of Public Participation.” Landscape Research 32 (5): 613–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.A., and M.A. Casey. 2009. Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M.-P. 2004. “GIS Methods in Time-Geographic Research: Geocomputation and Geovisualization of Human Activity Patterns.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86: 267–280.
   Google Scholar
• Lantmäteriet. 2008. The Swedish Mapping, Cadastral and Land Registration Authority. Landowner Register. Örebro: Örebro County.
   Google Scholar
• Leazun, J., and L. Soneryd. 2007. “Consulting Citizens' Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 16: 279–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert, R. 1932. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes.” Archives of Psychology, No. 140.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, M., M. Johansson, J. Herrmann, and O. Jonsson. 2006. “Attitudes Towards the Conservation of Biological Diversity.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49 (4): 495–513.
   Google Scholar
• Mikusiński, G., M. Blicharska, H. Antonson, M. Henningsson, G. Göransson, P. Angelstam, and A. Seiler. 2013. “Integrating Ecological, Social and Cultural Dimensions in the Implementation of the Landscape Convention.” Landscape Research 38: 384–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikusiński, G., and L. Edenius. 2006. “Assessment of Spatial Functionality of Old Forest in Sweden as Habitat for Virtual Species.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21: 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, J., T. O' Riordan, S.A. Nicholson-Cole, and A.R. Watkinson. 2009. “Nature Conservation for Future Sustainable Shorelines: Lessons from Seeking to Involve the Public.” Land Use Policy 26: 203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1998. The Focus Group Guidebook. The Focus Group Kit No 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nijnik, M., L. Zhvovyska, A. Nijnik, and Å. Ode. 2008. “Public Evaluation of Landscape Content and Change: Several Examples from Europe.” Land Use Policy 26: 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, S.S., and T.E. Heinzen. 2008. Statistics for Behavioural Sciences. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, L., and P. Varley. 2012. “Use of Ethnographic Approaches to the Study of Health Experiences in Relation to Natural Landscapes.” Perspectives in Public Health 132 (6): 305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, K., L. Edenius, and G. Mikusiński. 2011. “Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber revenue in long-term forest planning.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palang, H., H. Alumäe, A. Printsmann, M. Rehema, K. Sepp, and H. Sooväli-Sepping. 2011. “Ten Years of Planning ‘Valuable Landscapes’ in Estonia.” Land Use Policy 28: 19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., A.S.R. Manstead, and S.G. Stradling. 1995. “Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour: The Role of Personal Norm.” British Journal of Social Psychology 34: 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, L.J. 1998. “Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Social Research in Human Geography – An Impossible Mixture?” Environment and Planning A 30 (2): 261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., J. Peacock, R. Hine, M. Sellens, N. South, and M. Griffin. 2007. “Green Exercise in the UK Countryside: Effects on Health and Psychological Well-Being and Implications for Policy and Planning.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (2): 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primmer, E., and H. Karppinen. 2010. “Professional Judgment in Non-Industrial Private Forestry: Forester Attitudes and Social Norms Influencing Biodiversity Conservation.” Forest Policy and Economics 12 (2): 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadt, S., F. Knauer, P. Kaczensky, E. Revilla, T. Wiegand, and L. Trepl. 2002. “Rule-based Assessment of Suitable Habitat and Path Connectivity for the Eurasian Lynx.” Ecological Applications 12 (5): 1469–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlossberg, M., and E. Shuford. 2005. “Delineating ‘Public’ and ‘Participation’ in PPGIS.” URISA Journal 16 (2): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.H. 1977. “Normative Influences on Altruism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 10: 221–227.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A., and P. Shannon. 2007. “Local Landscape Designations in Scotland: Opportunity or Barrier to Effective Landscape Management?” Landscape and Urban Planning 81: 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setten, G. 2004. “The Habitus, the Rule and the Moral Landscape.” Cultural Geographies 11: 389–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenant, M., and M. Antrop. 2009. “Transdisciplinary Landscape Planning: Does the Public have Aspirations? Experiences from a Case Study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium).” Land Use Policy 27 (2): 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. 1971. The Roads Act (Sw. Väglagen). SFS 1971:948.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 1998. The Environmental Code (Sw. Miljöbalken). SFS 1998:808.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsson, L. 2003. “Landscape as an Arena for Applied Environmental Studies.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 57: 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Soini, K., H. Vaarala, and E. Pouta. 2012. “Residents' Sense of Place and Landscape Perceptions at the Rural-Urban Interface.” Landscape and Urban Planning 104 (1): 124–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneryd, L. 2002. Environmental Conflicts and Deliberative Solutions. A Case Study of Public Participation in EIA in Sweden. Studies in Sociology 5. Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Stenseke, M. 2009. “Local Participation in Cultural Landscape Maintenance: Lessons from Sweden.” Land Use Policy 26: 214–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Store, R., and J. Jokimäki. 2003. “A GIS-based Multi-Scale Approach to Habitat Suitability Modeling.” Ecological Modelling 169: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S.R., and R.J. Foster, 2000. Community Perception of Landscape Values in the South Island High Country. A Literature Review of Current Knowledge and Evaluation of Survey Methods. Science for Conservation 159. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Housing, Building and Planning. 2007. Landskapets upplevelsevärden – vilka är de och var finns de? (The Perceptions of the Landscape – Which are They and Where are They?). Karlskrona: Swedish Board of Housing, Building and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 1999. Fördjupad vägutredning, E18 Värmlands läns gräns – Adolfsberg, delen Lekhyttan – Adolfsberg (Deepened Feasibility Study with an EIS), June 1999 (in Swedish). Eskilstuna: Road Administration, Region Mälardalen.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 2003a. Arbetsplan, Väg E18 Karlskoga-Örebro, delen Lekhyttan-Adolfsberg. Objektnr: VMN 10442 (EIS in the Detailed Design Plan), 2003-02-25 (in Swedish). Eskilstuna: Road Administration, Region Mälardalen.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 2003b. Arbetsplan, Väg E18 Karlskoga-Örebro, delen Lekhyttan-Adolfsberg. Objektnr: VMN 10442. (Detailed design plan). 2003-02-25 (in Swedish). Eskilstuna: Road Administration, Region Mälardalen.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Road Administration. 2005. E18 Lekhyttan – Adolfsberg. Kompletterande vägutredning för val av trafikplatslösning i Lekhytteområdet, Samrådshandling. Objektnummer: 10442. (Complement to Detailed Design Plan with an EIS). November 2005 (in Swedish). Eskilstuna: Road Administration, Region Mälardalen.
   Google Scholar
• Tonglet, M., P.S. Phillips, and M.P. Bates. 2004. “Determining the Drivers for Householder Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Waste Minimization Compared to Recycling.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 42: 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombulak, S.C., and C.A. Frissell. 2000. “Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities.” Conservation Biology 14: 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eetvelde, V., and M. Antrop. 2009. “Indicators for Assessing Changing Landscape Character of Cultural Landscapes in Flanders (Belgium).” Land Use Policy 26 (4): 901–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vouligny, E., G. Domon, and J. Ruiz. 2009. “An Assessment of Ordinary Landscapes by an Expert and by its Residents: Landscape Values in Areas of Intensive Agricultural Use.” Land Use Policy 26: 890–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wauters, E., C. Bielders, J. Poesen, G. Govers, and E. Mathijs. 2010. “Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in Belgium: An Examination of Theory of Planned Behaviour in the Agri-Environmental Domain.” Land Use Policy 27: 86–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G. 2008. “Thresholds and Criteria for Evaluating and Communicating Impact Significance in Environmental Statements: ‘See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil’?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28: 22–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, G., J. Glasson, and J. Becker. 2006. “EIA Scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner Approaches, Perspectives and Constraints.” Environment Impact Assessment Review 26: 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar