541
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Management challenges of urban biosolids: narratives around facility siting in rural Ontario

, , , , &
Pages 1363-1383 | Received 01 Nov 2013, Accepted 15 May 2014, Published online: 16 Jun 2014

References

  • Aronson, Naomi. 1984. “Science as a Claims Making Activity: Implications for Social Problems Research.” Chap. 1 in Studies in the Sociology of Social Problems, edited by Joseph W. Schneider and John. I. Kitsuse, 1–30. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Axelrad, Gilad, Tomer Gershfeld, and Eli Feinerman. 2013. “Reclamation of Sewage Sludge for Use in Israeli Agriculture: Economic, Environmental and Organizational Aspects.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56 (10): 1419–1448. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.732009.
  • Bammer, Gabriele, and Michael Smithson, eds. 2008. Uncertainty and Risk Multidisciplinary Perspectives. London: Earthscan.
  • Baxter, Jamie. 2006. “Place Impacts of Technological Hazards: A Case Study of Community Conflict as Outcome.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49 (3): 337–360.
  • Beck, Ulrich. 2006. “Living in the World Risk Society.” Economy and Society 35 (3): 329–345. doi:10.1080/03085140600844902.
  • Beecher, Ned, Barry Connell, Elliot Epstein, Jennifer Filtz, Nora Goldstein, and Maile Lono. 2004. Public Perception of Biosolids Recycling: Developing Public Participation and Earning Trust Final Report (No. 00-PUM-5). London: Water Environment Research Foundation, IWA Publishing.
  • Bengston, David N., David P. Fan, Patrick Reed, and Ashley Goldhor-Wilcock. 2009. “Rapid Issue Tracking: A Method for Taking the Pulse of the Public Discussion of Environmental Policy.” Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 3 (3): 367–385. doi:10.1080/17524030903230165.
  • Crosby, D. 2012. “David Suzuki Foundation Won't Support Lystek Operation.” Owen Sound Sun Times, January 31.
  • Crosby, D. 2011. “Farmer Backs Lystek Plant as a Better Way.” Owen Sound Sun Times, December 23.
  • Demeritt, David. 2000. “The New Contract for Science: Accountability, Relevance and Value in US and UK Science Policy. Atipode 32 (3): 308–329. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00137.
  • Dijkema, G.P.J., M.A. Reuter, and E.V. Verhoef. 2000. “A New Paradigm for Waste Management.” Waste Management 20 (8): 633–638.
  • Douglas, Mary. 1992. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
  • Edelstein, Michael R. 2004. Contaminated Communities: Coping with Residential Toxic Exposure. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
  • Fowler, M. 2012. “Eco-Park Benefits Both the Economy and Environment.” Owen Sound Sun Times, May 3.
  • Frewer, Lynn J. 2003. “Trust, Transparency, and Social Context: Implications for the Social Amplification of Risk.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson, and Paul Slovic, 123–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Garvin, Theresa, and John Eyles. 1997. “The Sun Safety Metanarrative: Translating Science into Public Health Discourse”. Policy Sciences 30: 47–70.
  • Gattie, David K., and David L. Lewis. 2004. “A High-Level Disinfection Standard for Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (Biosolids).” Environmental Health Perspectives 112 (2): 126–131. PMCID: PMC1241820.
  • Goven, Joanna, and E.R. (Lisa) Langer. 2009. “The Potential of Public Engagement in Sustainable Waste Management: Designing the Future for Biosolids in New Zealand.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 921–930. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.006.
  • Goven, Joanna, E.R. (Lisa) Langer, Virginia Baker, James Ataria, and Alan Leckie. 2012. “Community Engagement in the Management of Biosolids: Lessons from Four New Zealand Studies.” Journal of Environmental Management 103: 154–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.007.
  • Halstead, John M., and Joanna L. Whitcomb. 1994. “Getting Beyond No: Strategies for MSW Composting Facility Siting.” Biocycle 35 (11): 35–39.
  • Harrison, Kathryn. 1991. “Between Science and Politics: Assessing the Risks of Dioxins in Canada and the United States.” Policy Sciences 24: 367–388.
  • Harrison, Ellen Z., Summer Rayne Oakes, Matthew Hysell, and Anthony Hay. 2006. “Organic Chemicals in Sewage Sludge.” Science of the Total Environment 367: 481–497. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.04.002.
  • Harthorn, Barbara Herr, and Laury Oaks, eds. 2003. Risk, Culture, and Health Inequality: Shifting Perceptions of Danger and Blame. Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
  • Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy, and Patricia Leavy, eds. 2004. Approaches to Qualitative Research: A Reader on Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoppe, Robert. 2005. “Rethink the Science-Policy Nexus: From Knowledge Utilization and Science Technology Studies to Types of Boundary Arrangements.” Poiesis Prax 3: 199–215. doi:10.1007/s10202-005-0074-0.
  • Howland, Dave, Mimi Larsen Becker, and Lawrence J. Prelli. 2006. “Merging Content Analysis and the Policy Sciences: A System to Discern Policy Specific Trends from News Media Reports.” Policy Sciences 39: 205–231. doi:10.1007/s11077-006-9016-5.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2010. “Testing Time for Climate Science.” Science 328: 965–966.
  • Jenkins, Suzanne R., Carl W. Armstrong, and Michele M. Monti. November 2007. “Health Effects of Biosolids Applied to Land: Available Scientific Evidence.” Accessed June 1, 2012. http://www.virginiabiosolids.com/pdf/Biosolids_Available_Evidence_1107.pdf
  • Jones, Celia Carroll. 2011. “Environmental Justice in Rural Context: Land-Application of Biosolids in Central Virginia.” Environmental Justice 4 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1089/env.2009.0034.
  • Kasperson Jeanne, X., Roger E. Kasperson, Nick Pidgeon, and Paul Slovic. 2003. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by Nick Pidgeon, Roger E. Kasperson, and Paul Slovic, 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krimsky, Sheldon. 1992. “The Role of Theory in Risk Studies.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by Shelson Krimsky and Dominic Golding, 3–22. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Krogmann, U., V. Gibson, and C. Chess. 2001. “Land Application of Sewage Sludge: Perceptions of New Jersey Vegetable Farmers.” Waste Management and Research 19: 115–125. doi: 10.1177/0734242×0101900204.
  • Kunreuther, Howard, Paul Slovic, and Donald McGregor. 1996. “Risk Perception and Trust: Challenges for Facility Siting.” Risk: Health, Safety and Environment 109: 109–118.
  • Laswell, H.D. 1971. A Pre-View of the Policy Sciences. New York: American Elsevier.
  • LeBlanc, Ronald J., Conrad J. Allain, Peter J. Laughton, and J. Glynn Henry. 2004. “Integrated, Long Term, Sustainable, Cost Effective Biosolids Management at a Large Canadian Wastewater Treatment Facility.” Water Science and Technology 49 (10): 155–162.
  • Lewis, David L., David K. Gattie, Marc E. Novak, Susan Sanchez, and Charles Pumphrey. 2002. “Interactions of Pathogens and Irritant Chemicals in Land-Applied Sewage Sludges (biosolids).” BMC Public Health 2: 11–18.
  • Lindsay, Bruce E., Haojiang Zhou, and John M. Halstead. 2000. “Factors Influencing Resident Attitudes Regarding the Land Application of Biosolids.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 15 (2): 88–94. doi: 10.1017/S0889189300008547.
  • Lowman, Amy, Mary Anne McDonald, Steve Wing, and Naeema Muhammad. 2013. “Land Application of Treated Sewage Sludge: Community Health and Environmental Justice.” Environmental Health Perspectives 121 (5): 537–542.
  • Lucia, Lorenzo Di, Serina Ahlgren, and Karin Ericsson. 2012. “The Dilemma of Indirect Land-Use Changes in EU Biofuel Policy: An Empirical Study of Policy-Making in the Context of Scientific Uncertainty.” Environmental Science and Policy 16: 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.004.
  • Lystek International Inc. 2012a. “Recycling Biosolids – It's the Right Thing to Do.” September 2012.
  • Lystek International Inc. 2012b. “Land Application of Biosolids in the UK.” August 2012.
  • Lystek International Inc. 2012c. “Inaugural Newsletter - Southgate Organic Material Recovery Centre.” January 2012.
  • Masuda, Jeffrey R., and Theresa Garvin. 2006. “Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk.” Risk Analysis 26 (2): 437–454.
  • McMullen, Colin, and John Eyles. 1999. “Risky Business: An Analysis of Claims Making in the Development of an Ontario Drinking Water Objective for Tritium.” Social Problems 46 (2): 294–311. doi:10.2307/3097257.
  • Mkandawire, Paul, Isaac N. Luginaah, and Rachel Bezner-Kerr. 2011. “Deadly Divide: Malawi's Policy Debate on HIV/AIDS and Condoms.” Policy Sciences 44: 81–102. doi:10.1007/s121077-010-9111-5.
  • Neuman, W. Lawrence., and Karen Robson. 2008. Basics of Social Research Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Canadian ed. Toronto: Pearson Education Canada.
  • Newspapers Canada. 2014a. “Community Newspaper Snapshot 2013.” Accessed March 1. http://www.newspaperscanada.ca/about-newspapers/circulation
  • Newspapers Canada. 2014b. “2012 Daily Newspaper Circulation Report.” Accessed March 1. http://www.newspaperscanada.ca/daily-newspaper-circulation-data
  • OMAFRA (Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2010. Best Management Practices: Application of Municipal Sewage Biosolids to Cropland. Toronto: Queens Printer for Ontario.
  • Ontario Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. 2013. “Environmental Compliance Approval (011–4541).” January 8. http://www.ebr.gov.on.ca/ERS-WEB-External/searchCommentList.do?ebrNum=011-4541&noticeId=MTE0Mjk3&statusId=MTc2MTc2&noticeHeaderIdString=MTE0Mjk3
  • Pal, Leslie A. 2014. Beyond Policy Analysis: Policy Issue Management in Turbulent Times. 5th ed. Toronto: Nelson.
  • Robinson, Kevin G., Carolyn H. Robinson, Lauren A. Raup, and Travis R. Markum. 2012. “Public Attitudes and Risk Perceptions Toward Land Application of Biosolids Within the South-Eastern United States.” Journal of Environmental Management 98: 29–36. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.012.
  • Ross, Victoria L., Kelly S. Fielding, and Winnifred R. Louis. 2014. “Social Trust, Risk Perceptions and Public Acceptance of Recycled Water: Testing a Social-Psychological Model.” Journal of Environmental Management 137: 61–68.
  • Sabatier, Paul A. 1987. “Knowledge, Policy Oriented Learning, and Policy Change.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8 (4): 649–692. doi: 10.1177/0164025987008004005.
  • “Show of Support: Council of Canadians Visits Dundalk Blockade.” 2012. Mount Forest Confederate, June 14.
  • Silverman, Chloe. 2001. “Molecular Stories.” Science as Culture 10 (2): 255–263.
  • Slovic, Paul. 1987. “Risk Perception.” Science 236 (4799): 280–285.
  • Slovic, P. 1999. “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield.” Risk Analysis 19 (4): 689–701.
  • Statistics Canada. 2012. Southgate, Ontario (Code 3542005) and Dundalk, Ontario (Code 0244) (table). Census Profile. 2011 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-XWE. Ottawa. Released October 24, 2012. Accessed December 10 2012. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E.
  • Township of Southgate. 2012. “SPIRG Building Permit Appeal Unsuccessful.” Accessed January 14, 2013. https://southgate.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Id=21860.
  • Thomas, Alexander R., Brian M. Lowe, Gregory M. Fulkerson, and Polly J. Smith. 2011. Critical Rural Theory Structure, Space, Culture. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  • Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1980. Landscapes of Fear. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Van den Hove, Sybille. 2007. “A Rationale for Science–Policy Interfaces.” Futures 39 (7): 807–826. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004.
  • Von Schomberg, Rene. 1993. Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Wakefield, Sarah, and Susan J. Elliot. 2003. “Constructing the News: The Role of Local Newspapers in Environmental Risk Communication.” The Professional Geographer 55 (2): 216–226. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502009.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.