275
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

A new recoding method for treating protest responses in contingent valuation studies using travel cost data

Pages 1479-1489 | Received 04 Mar 2014, Accepted 03 Jun 2014, Published online: 02 Jul 2014

References

  • Atkinson, J., S. Morse-Jones, S. Mourato, and A. Provins. 2012. “When to Take No for an Answer? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51: 497–523.
  • Bateman, I.J., R.T. Carson, N. Hanley, B.H. Day, M. Haneman, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, et al. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltemham: Edward Elgar.
  • Bishop, R.C., and T.A. Heberlein. 1979. “Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 926–930.
  • Bonnichsen, O., and J. Ladenburg. 2009. “Using an Ex-ante Entreaty to Reduce Protest Zero Bias in Stated Preference Surveys – a Health Economic Case.” Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2): 200–215.
  • Boyle, K.J., H.F. MacDonald, H.T. Cheng, and D.W. McCollum. 1998. “Bid Design and Yea Saying in Single-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Questions.” Land Economics 74: 49–64.
  • Boyle, K.J., M.P. Welsh, and R.C. Bishop. 1993. “The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economic and Management 25 (1): 88–99.
  • Brouwer, R., and J. Martín-Ortega. 2012. “Modeling Self-Censoring of Polluter Pays Protest Votes in Stated Preference Research to Support Resource Damage Estimations in Environmental Liability.” Resource and Energy Economics 34: 151–166.
  • Calia, P., and E. Strazzera. 2001. “A Sample Selection Model for Protest Non-response Votes in Contingent Valuation Analyses.” Statistica 61 (3): 473–485.
  • Clinch, J.P. and A. Murphy. 2001. “Modelling Winners and Losers in Contingent Valuation of Public Goods: Appropriate Welfare Measures and Econometric Analysis.” The Economic Journal 111, 420–443.
  • Cooper, J.C. 1993. “Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 25–40.
  • Dziegielewska, D.A., and R. Mendelsohn. 2007. “Does “No” Mean “No”? A Protest Methodology.” Environmental and Resource Economics 38: 71–87.
  • Fonta, W., E. Ichoku, and J. Kabubo-Mariara. 2010. “The Effects of Protest Zeros on Estimates of Willingness to Pay in Healthcare Contingent Valuation Analysis.” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 8 (4): 225–237.
  • García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, and C. Montes. 2011. “Exploring the Motivations of Protesters in Contingent Valuation: Insights for Conservation Policies.” Environmental Science and Policy 14: 76–88.
  • Haneman, W.M. 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (3): 332–341.
  • Jakonson, K.M., and A.K. Dragun. 2001. “The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19: 211–227.
  • Jorgensen, B.S., G.J. Syme, B.J. Bishop, and B.E. Nancarrow. 1999. “Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 14 (1): 131–150.
  • Kriström, B. 1997. “Spike Models in Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 1013–1023.
  • Lindhjem, H., and S. Navrud. 2011. “Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to-Face Interviews in Contingent Valuation?” Ecological Economics 70: 1628–1637.
  • Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2006. “Protest Beliefs in Contingent Valuation: Explaining Their Motivation.” Ecological Economics 57: 583–594.
  • Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2010. “Determinants of Protest Responses in Environmental Valuation: A Meta-study.” Ecological Economics 70: 366–374.
  • Meyerhoff, J., M. R. Morkbak, and S. B. Olsen. 2014. “A Meta-Study Investigating the Sources of Protest Behaviour in Stated Preference Surveys”. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58 (1): 35–57.
  • Mitchel, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Morrison, M.D., R.K. Blamey, and J.W. Bennet. 2000. “Minimising Payment Vehicle Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 16: 407–422.
  • Nunes, P., and J. Van den Bergh. 2004. “Can People Value Protection Against Invasive Marine Species? Evidence from a Joint TC-CV Survey in the Netherlands.” Environmental and Resource Economics 28: 517–532.
  • Pemberton, C.A., E. Harris-Charles, and H. Patterson-Andrews. 2010. “Cultural Bias in Contingent Valuation of Copper Mining in the Commonwealth of Dominica.” Ecological Economics 70: 19–23.
  • Ramajo-Hernández, J., and S. Saz-Salazar. 2012. “Estimating the Non-market Benefits of Water Quality Improvement for a Case Study in Spain: A Contingent Valuation Approach.” Environmental Science and Policy 22: 47–59.
  • Riera, P. 1994. Manual de Valoración Contingente[Contingent Valuation Manual]. Instituto de estudios fiscales. Madrid: Institute of Fiscal Studies.
  • Saz-Salazar, S., and I. Guaita-Pradas. 2013. “On the Value of Drovers’ Routes as Environmental Assets: A Contingent Valuation Approach.” Land Use Policy 32: 78–88.
  • Strazzera, E., M. Genius, R. Scarpa, and G. Hutchinson (2003a). The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of WTP for Use Values of Recreational Sites.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25: 461–476.
  • Strazzera, E., R. Scarpa, P. Calia, G. Garrod, and K. Willis (2003b). Modelling Zero Values and Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Applied Economics 35 (2): 133–138.
  • Szabo, Z. 2011. “Reducing Protest Responses by Deliberative Monetary Valuation: Improving the Validity of Biodiversity Valuation.” Ecological Economics 72: 37–44.
  • Whittington, D., V.K. Smith, A. Okorafor, A. Okore, J.L. Liu, and A. McPhail. 1992. “Giving Respondents Time to Think in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Developing Countries Application.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 (3): 205–225.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.