Eliciting preferences for wetland services: a way to manage conflicting land uses

References

• Adamowicz, V., J. Louviere, and J. Swait. 1998. Introduction to Attribute-Based Stated Choice Methods. Edmonton: Advanis.
   Google Scholar
• Alphandéry, P., and A. Fortier. 2001. “Can a Territorial Policy be Based on Science Alone? The System for Creating the Natura 2000 Network in France.” Sociologia Ruralis 41: 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreopoulos, D., D. Damigos, F. Comiti, and C. Fischer. 2015. “Estimating the Non-Market Benefits of Climate Change Adaptation of River Ecosystem Services: A Choice Experiment Application in the Aoos Basin, Greece.” Environmental Science and Policy 45: 92–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier, E., M. Acreman, and D. Knowler. 1997. Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, R., and M. Montginoul. 2013. “120 m3 – Le consommateur en question: Foreword.” Sciences Eaux et Territoires 10: 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I., R.T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, H. Tannis, M. Jones-Lee, et al. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bech, M., and D. Gyrd-Hansen. 2005. “Effects Coding in Discrete Choice Experiments.” Health Economics 14: 1079–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and V. Adamowicz. 2001. “Some Fundamentals of Environmental Choice Modelling.” In The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, edited by J. Bennett and R. Blamey, 37–72. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Birol, E., N. Hanley, P. Koundouri, and Y. Kountouris. 2009. “Optimal Management of Wetlands: Quantifying Trade-offs Between Flood Risks, Recreation, and Biodiversity Conservation.” Water Resources Research 45: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, E., K. Karousakis, and P. Koundouri. 2006. “Using a Choice Experiment to Account for Preference Heterogeneity in Wetland Attributes: The Case of Cheimaditida Wetland in Greece.” Ecological Economics 60: 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, P., and W. Adamowicz. 1999. Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis. Edmonton: Department of Rural Economy, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Home Economics, University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R. , S. Georgiou, and R.K. Turner. 2003. “Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Water and Wetland Management. A Review of Concepts and Methods.” Integrated Assessment 4: 172–184.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., I.H. Langford, I.J. Bateman, and R.K. Turner. 1999. “A Meta-Analysis of Wetland Contingent Valuation Studies.” Regional Environmental Change 1: 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., J. Martin-Ortega, and J. Berbel. 2010. “Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment.” Land Economics 86: 552–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M., A. La Notte, V. Laporte, and M. Erhard. 2012. “Potentials of Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Assessing Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Indicators 21: 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbiener, R. 1970. “Un exemple de type forestier exceptionnel pour l'Europe occidentale : La forêt du lit majeur du Rhin au niveau du fossé Rhénan (Fraxuni-Ulmetum OBERD. 53). Intérêt écologique et Biogéographique. Comparaison à d'autres forêts thermophiles” [An Example of Exceptional Temperate European Forest: The Alluvial Hardwood Flood-Forest Overgrowing the Upper Rhine Rift Valley (Fraxuni-Ulmetum OBERD. 53). Ecological and Biogeographical Interest. Comparison with Other Thermophilous Forests]. Vegetatio 20: 97–148.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., P. Frykblom, and C. Liljenstolpe. 2003 “Valuing Wetland Attributes: An Application of Choice Experiments.” Ecological Economics 47: 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caussade, S., J. de Dios Ortúzar, L.I. Rizzi, and D. Hensher. 2005. “Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiments Estimates.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 39: 621–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Shacham, E., T. Dayan, E. Feitelson, and R. de Groot. 2011. “Ecosystem Service Trade-offs in Wetland Management: Drainage and Rehabilitation of the Hula, Israel.” Hydrological Sciences Journal 56 (8): 1582–1601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., M. Buszko-Briggs, and N. Hanley. 2009. “Valuing Changes in Forest Biodiversity.” Ecological Economics 68: 2910–2917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7: 260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dister, E. 1992. “La maîtrise des crues par renaturation des plaines alluviales du Rhin supérieur.” [Flood Control Through the Renaturation of the Rhine River Alluvial Plains]. Bulletin de la Société Industrielle de Mulhouse sur la nature 824: 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Dumax, N., and A. Rozan. 2011. “Using an Adapted HEP to Assess Environmental Cost.” Ecological Economics 72: 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2006. Land Accounts for Europe 1990–2000. Towards Integrated Land and Ecosystem Accounting. EEA Report 11/2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., K.R. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. “Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making.” Ecological Economics 68: 643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., and T. Kaberger. 1991. Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy: Essays from the Eco–Eco Group. Dordrecht: Klower Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gerakis, A., and K. Kalburtji. 1998. “Agricultural Activities Affecting the Functions and Values of Ramsar Wetland Sites of Greece.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 70 (2–3): 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., R. Chapman, and R. Blamey. 2001. “Assessing the Options for the Canberra Water Supply: An Application of Choice Modelling.” In The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, edited by J. Bennett and R. Blamey, 73–92. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2001. Fixed and Random Effects in Nonlinear Models. New York: Department of Economics, Stern School of Business.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W., and D. Hensher. 2003. “A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit.” Transportation Research B: Methodological 37: 681–698.
   Google Scholar
• Gren, I.M., C. Folke, K. Turner, and I. Batemen. 1994. “Primary and Secondary Values of Wetland Ecosystems.” Environmental Resource Economics 4 (1): 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2010. “The Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being.” In Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis, edited by D. Raffaelli and C. Frid, 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., M. Potschin, and F. Kienast. 2012. “Indicators of Ecosystem Service Potential at European Scales: Mapping Marginal Changes and Trade-offs.” Ecological Indicators 21: 39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M. 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, P.A., M. Vandewalle, M.T. Sykes, P.M. Berry, R. Bugter, F. de Bello, C.K. Feld, et al. 2010. “Identifying and Prioritising Services in European Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems.” Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2791–2821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, A.R. 2007. “A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures.” Health Economics 16: 827–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hruby, T., W. Cesanek, and K. Miller. 1995. “Estimating Relative Wetland Values for Regional Planning.” Wetlands 15: 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., and K. Zwerina. 1996. “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs.” Journal of Marketing Research 33: 307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaora, B. 2010. “Les zones humides et le Conservatoire du littoral : perceptions et cadre d'expérience.” [Wetlands and the Conservation of the French Coast: Perceptions and Frames of Action]. L'Espace géographique 39 (4): 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Koschke, L., C. Fürst, S. Frank, and F. Makeschin. 2012. “A Multi-Criteria Approach for an Integrated Land-Cover-Based Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision to Support Landscape Planning.” Ecological Indicators 21: 54–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefeuvre, A. 1992. “Le Plan de Protection Des Forêts Rhénanes.” [The Rhineland Forests Protection Plan]. Bulletin de la Société Industrielle de Mulhouse sur la nature 824: 281–286.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, N., E. Elron, and A. Gasith. 2009. “Decline of Wetland Ecosystems in the Coastal Plain of Israel During the 20th Century : Implications for Wetland Conservation and Management.” Landscape and Urban Planning 92: 3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. 1988. Analyzing Individual Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, J., C. Liquete, A. Teller, M. Erhard, P. Murphy, M.L. Paracchini, J.I. Barredo, et  al. 2016. “An Indicator Framework for Assessing Ecosystem Services in Support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020.” Ecosystem Services 17: 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyera, K., and K. Genskow. 2012. “Toward Integrated Wetland Conservation: A Diagnostic Framework.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56: 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C.F. 1977. “The Structure of Random Utility Models.” Theory and Decision 8: 229–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milon, J.W., and D. Scrogin. 2006. “Latent Preferences and Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Restoration.” Ecological Economics 56: 162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mission de suivi scientifique du polder d'Erstein. 2004. Synthèse des connaissances à l’état initial [Synthesis Report of Current Knowledge]. Strasbourg: Voies Navigables de France.
   Google Scholar
• Mission de suivi scientifique du polder d'Erstein. 2009. Synthèse générale : le polder a-t-il retrouvé la fonctionnalité d'une zone alluviale inondable? [General Synthesis Report: Has the Polder Recovered the Features of a Floodable Alluvial Area] Strasbourg: Voies Navigables de France.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsch, W.J., and J.G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morandi, B., 2010. Opération de restauration de zones inondables sur le Rhin: site du polder d'Erstein [Wetland Restoration Operations on the Rhine River: The Erstein Polder]. Lyon: Université de Lyon and CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage. 2012. Réserve de Chasse et de Faune Sauvage du Rhin – Rapport d'activité 2009-2010-2011 [The Rhine Game and Wildlife Reserve – Activity Report 2009-2010-2011]. Strasbourg: Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage.
   Google Scholar
• Piégay, H., G. Pautou, and C. Ruffinoni. 2003. Les forêts riveraines des cours d'eau : écologie, fonctions et gestion [Riverside Forest: Ecology, Function and Management]. Paris: Institut pour le développement forestier.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2013. The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (6th edition). Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Roeder, K., K. Lynch, and D. Nagin. 1999. “Modeling Uncertainty in Latent Class Membership: A Case Study in Criminology.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: 766–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajaloli, B. 1996. “Les zones humides : une nouvelle vitrine pour l'environnement.” [Wetlands : A New Showcase for Environment]. Bulletin de l'Association de Géographes Français 2: 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., and M. Thiene. 2005. “Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Preferences.” Land Economics 81: 426–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, L., M. Lebeau, M. Trémolières, S. Defraeye, C. Coli, and E. Denny. 2009. Le “polder” d'Erstein : objectifs, aménagements et retour d'expérience sur cinq ans de fonctionnement et de suivi scientifique environnemental (Rhin, France) [The Erstein Polder: Objectives, Planning and Lessons Learned from Five Years of Operating and Environmental Scientific Monitoring]. Ingénieries Numéro spécial: 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R.K., J.C.J.M. van den Bergh, T. Söderqvist, A. Barendregt, J. van der Straaten, E. Maltby, and E.C. van Ierland. 2000. “Ecological-Economic Analysis of Wetlands: Scientific Integration for Management and Policy.” Ecological Economics 35: 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven, A., K. Petz, R. Alkemade, L. Hein, and R. de Groot. 2012. “Framework for Systematic Indicator Selection to Assess Effects of Land Management on Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Indicators 21: 110–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voies Navigables de France. 2004. Inauguration du Polder d'Erstein – Dossier de presse [Official Opening of the Erstein Polder – Press Release]. Strasbourg: Voies Navigables de France.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., B. Zhang, S. Zhang, D. Li, K. Song, J. Li, and F. Li. 2006. “Changes of Land Use and Ecosystem Service Values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 112 (1–3): 69–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerberg, V.H., R. Lifran, and S.B. Olsen. 2010. “To Restore or Not? A Valuation of Social and Ecological Functions of the Marais des Baux Wetland in Southern France.” Ecological Economics 69: 2383–2393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R.T., and Y.S. Wui. 2001. “The Economic Value of Wetland Services: A Meta-Analysis.” Ecological Econonomics 37: 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwerina, K., J. Huber, and W.F. Kuhfeld. 2004. A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice Designs. Cary: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar