Local air pollution and global climate change taxes: a distributional analysis for the case of Spain

References

• Aigner, R. 2014. “Environmental Taxation and Redistribution Concerns.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 70 (29): 249–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank of Spain. 2014. Informe Anual 2013. Madrid: Bank of Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, T., and J. Köhler. 1998. “Equity and Ecotax Reform in the EU: Achieving a 10 Per Cent Reduction in CO2 Emissions Using Excise Duties.” Fiscal Studies 19 (4): 375–402.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, T., and K.E. Rosendahl. 2000. Ancillary Benefits of GHG Mitigation in Europe: SO₂, NO_X and PM₁₀ Reductions from Policies to Meet Kyoto Targets Using the E3ME Model and Externe Valuations. Paris: Organization Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., B. van der Zwaan, C. Brink, and H. Eerens. 2009. “Local Air Pollution and Global Climate Change: A Combined Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Resources and Energy Economics 31: 161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscá, J.E., R. Doménech, and J. Ferri. 2014. “Fiscal Devaluations in EMU.” Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública 206: 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. 1999. “Green Tax Reforms and the Double Dividend: An Updated Reader's Guide.” International Tax and Public Finance 6: 421–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A., and R. de Mooij. 1994. “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation.” American Economic Review 84: 1085–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannlund, R., and J. Nordstrom. 2004. “Carbon Tax Simulations Using a Household Demand Model.” European Economic Review 48: 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buñuel, M. 2011. “El precio de la electricidad y la política de cambio climático: ¿qué papel puede jugar un impuesto sobre el carbono en España? “[The Price of Electricity and Climate Change Policy: What Role May a Carbon Tax Play in Spain?]” Estudios de Economía Aplicada 29.
   Google Scholar
• CASES (Cost Assessment of Sustainable Energy System). 2006. “External Cost Per Unit Emission”, Cost Assessment of Sustainable Energy Systems. www.feem-project.net/cases/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Creedy, J. 1999. Modelling Indirect Taxes and Tax Reform. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Economic Review 70: 312–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demisse, G.E., I. Burtnar., M. Llop, and F. Castells. 2014. “Economic and Environmental Effects of CO2 Taxation; An Input-Output Analysis for Spain.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57: 751–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, R., A. Mainar, and J. Sanchez-Choliz. 2012. “Social Groups and CO2 Emissions in Spanish Households.” Energy Policy 44: 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekins, P., H. Pollitt, J. Barton, and D. Blobel. 2011. “The Implications for Households of Environmental Tax Reform (ETR) in Europe.” Ecological Economics 70: 2472–2485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, P., G. Ganelli, J. Tervala, and S. Voigts. 2014. “Fiscal Devaluation in a Monetary Union.” IMF Working Papers 14/201. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2013. Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, K., K. Hubacek, D. Guan, M. Contestabile, J. Minx, and J. Barrett. 2010. “Distributional Effects of Climate Change Taxation: The Case of the UK.” Environmental Science and Technology 44: 3670–3676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, F. 2012. “Distributional Effects of Carbon Taxes: The Case of Mexico.” Energy Economics 34: 2102–2115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. 1995. “Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader's Guide.” International Tax and Public Finance 2: 157–183.
   Google Scholar
• IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2014. “Spain: 2014 Article IV Consultation Concluding Statement of the Mission Madrid.” http://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2014/052714.htm
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2013a. Contabilidad Nacional de España. Base 2000. Marco Input-Output. Tabla Simétrica, Año 2005. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. www.ine.es.
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2013b. Cuentas satélite sobre emisiones atmosféricas. Año 2005. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. www.ine.es.
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2013c. Encuesta continua de presupuestos familiares, base 1997. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. www.ine.es.
   Google Scholar
• Kerkhof, A.C., H.C. Moll, E. Drissen, and H.C. Wilting. 2008. “Taxation of Multiple Greenhouse Gases and the Effects on Income Distribution: A Case Study of the Netherlands.” Ecological Economics 67: 318–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiulia, O., A. Markandya, M. Scasny, and F.M. Tsuchimoto. 2013. “The Economic and Environmental Effects of Taxing Air Pollutants and CO2: Lessons from a Study of the Czech Republic.” Working Paper No. 66599. Prague: Charles University Environment Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Labandeira, X., and J. Labeaga. 1999. “Combining Input-Output Analysis and Micro-Simulation to Assess the Effects of Carbon Taxation on Spanish Households.” Fiscal Studies 20: 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Labandeira, X., J.M. Labeaga, and M. Rodríguez. 2004. “Green Tax Reforms in Spain.” European Environment 14: 290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., A. Bigano, and P. Roberto. 2010. The Social Cost of Electricity: Scenarios and Policy Implications. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., M. González-Eguino, and M. Escapa. 2013. “From Shadow to Green: Linking Environmental Fiscal Reforms and the Informal Economy.” Energy Economics 40: S108–S118.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. 1999. “A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms.” National Tax Journal 52: 655–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G.E., A. Mathur, and K.A. Hassett. 2010. Distributional Impacts in a Comprehensive Climate Policy Package. Working Paper No. 16101. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• de Mooij, R., and M. Keen. 2012. “‘Fiscal Devaluation’ and Fiscal Consolidation: The VAT in Troubled Times.” NBER Working Papers 17913. Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2000. “Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.” In Proceedings of an IPCC Co-Sponsored Workshop, Washington, DC: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2011. OECD Perspectives: Spain Policies for a Sustainable Recovery. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, I. 2004. “Are Emissions Permits Regressive?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 364–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and S. Smith. 1991. The European Carbon Tax: An Assessment of the European Commission's Proposals. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Poterba, J.M. 1991. Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive? Working Paper No. 3578 Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, S., K. King, and J. Sturman. 2006. Air Quality and Social Deprivation in the UK: An Environmental Inequalities Analysis. London: Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rausch, S., G.E. Metcalf, and J.M. Reilly. 2011. “Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A General Equilibrium Approach with Micro-Data for Households.” Energy Economics 33: S20–S33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• del Río González, P. 2008. “Policy Implications of Potential Conflicts Between Short-Term and Long-Term Efficiency in CO2 Emissions Abatement.” Ecological Economics 65: 292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Jordán, D., P. del Rio, and M. Burguillo. 2014. “Modelling Fuel Demand of Passenger Cars in Spain: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis Using the Generalised Method of Moments.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 48: 315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, T., and D. Tarr. 2008. Regional Household and Poverty Effects of Russia's Accession to the World Trade Organization. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, J.F., D. Romero, J. Castaner, J. Prieto, and J.F. Fernandez. 2003. Microsimulación y comportamiento en el análisis de reformas de imposición indirecta. El simulador de Imposición Indirecta del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales (SINDIEF). [Microsimulation and Behaviour to Analyse Indirect Taxes Reforms. The Spanish Institute for Fiscal Studies Simulator of Indirect Taxation (SINDIEF)]. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
   Google Scholar
• Schöb, R. 1997. “Environmental Taxes and Pre-Existing Distortions: The Normalization Trap.” International Tax and Public Finance 4: 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, T. 2012. “Distributional Effects of Taxing Transport Fuel.” Energy Policy 41: 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, R., M. Amann, F. Raes, and W. Tuinstra. 2004. “A Good Climate for Clean Air: Linkages between Climate Change and Air Pollution: An Editorial Essay.” Climate Change 66: 263–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, E.J., S. Speck, and J.L.R. Proops. 2002. “The Distributional Effects of Carbon and Energy Taxes: The Cases of France, Spain, Italy and UK.” European Environment 12: 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Tiezzi, S. 2005. “The Welfare Effects and the Distributive Impact of Carbon Taxation on Italian Households.” Energy Policy 33: 1597–1612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol, R. 2005. “The Marginal Damage Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of the Uncertainties.” Energy Policy 33: 2064–2074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G.P., G. Mitchell, J. Fairburn, and G. Smith. 2003. Environmental Quality and Social Deprivation. Phase II: National Analysis of Flood Hazard, IPC Industries and Air Quality. R&D Project Record E2-067/1/PR1. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2009. Global Health Risk: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks. Geneva: World Health Organization
   Google Scholar
• Wier, M., K. Birr-Pedersen, H. Jacobsen, and J. Klok. 2005. “Are CO2 Taxes Regressive? Evidence from the Danish Experience.” Ecological Economics 52: 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and T. Masui. 2009. “Local Air Pollutant Emission Reduction and Ancillary Carbon Benefits of SO2 Control Policies: Application of AIM/CGE Model to China.” European Journal of Operational Research 198: 315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar