Combining land-use planning and tenure security: a tenure responsive land-use planning approach for developing countries

References

• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Augustinus, C. 2016. “Addressing Global Land Challenges.” Global Urban Lectures of Global Land Tool Network/UN-Habitat. Accessed August 28, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FPMbmDds2g&index=6&list=PLTQZbEc6Bv5_KkrmgCEBy6ZBKiexXW1a5
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R.M., H.A. Van Gils., J.A. Zevenbergen, C.H. Lemmen, and J. Wallace. 2013. “Continuing to Bridge the Cadastral Divide.” Paper presented at the World Bank Land and Poverty Conference, Washington, DC, April 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, A. 1949. The Process of Government. Evanston, IL: Principia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, P. 2006. “The Challenging Business of Long-Term Public–Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience.” Public Administration Review 66: 400–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G. 1996. Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J.M., and C.B. Crosby. 2008. “Failing Into Cross-Sector Collaboration Successfully.” In Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management, edited by L.B. Bingham and R. O'Leary, 55–78. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Challies, E., J. Newig, T. Thaler, E. Kochskämper, and M. Levin-Keitel. 2016. “Participatory and Collaborative Governance for Sustainable Flood Risk Management: An Emerging Research Agenda.” Environmental Science and Policy 55: 275–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A.S., A.K. Gerlak, L. Dale, and K. Mattor. 2015. “Examining the Adaptability of Collaborative Governance Associated with Publicly Managed Ecosystems Over Time: Insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA.” Ecology and Society 20 (1): 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigbu, U.E., and V. Kalashyan. 2015. “Land-Use Planning and Public Administration in Bavaria, Germany: Towards a Public Administration Approach to Land-Use Planning.” Geomatics, Land Management and Landscape 1: 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chigbu, U.E., F. Masum, W.T. de Vries, F. Siegert, Z.A. Mekuria, P. Sakaria, A.I. Agboeze, et al. 2016. “Participatory Rapid Co-Design for Transformative Resource Governance Research in the Gulf of Guinea.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 20: 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigbu, U.E., F. Masum, A. Leitmeier, S. Mabikke, D. Antonio, J. Espinoza, and A. Hernig. 2015. “Securing Tenure Through Land-Use Planning: Conceptual Framework, Evidences and Experiences from Selected Countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America.” Paper presented at the World Bank Land and Poverty Conference, Washington, DC, March 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, D.J. 1984. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., and P. Murchie. 2010. “Collaborative Governance and Climate Change: Opportunities for Public Administration.” In The Future of Public Administration, Public Management, and Public Service Around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by R. O'Leary, D. Van Slyke, and S. Kim, 141–153. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 1993. Guidelines for Land-Use Planning. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• GIZ. 2011. Land-Use Planning: Concept, Tools and Applications. Eschborn: GIZ.
   Google Scholar
• GTZ. 1995. Landnutzungsplanung: Strategien, Instrumente, Methoden [Land-Use Planning: Strategies, Instruments and Methods]. Eschborn: GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• IFAD. 2014. How to Do Participatory Land-Use Planning: Land Tenure Toolkit. Rome: IFAD.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Surveyors. 1999. The Bathurst Declaration on Land Administration for Sustainable Development. Denmark: FIG.
   Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., F. Yuldashev, and E. Bakiev. 2016. “Collaborative Public Management and Collaborative Governance: Conceptual Similarities and Differences.” European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 2 (1): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T.M., and C.W. Thomas. 2006. “What Do We Know and Need to Know About the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?.” Public Administration Review 66: 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management and Democracy: Evidence from Western Watershed Partnerships.” Public Administration Review 66: 100–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manring, N.J. 2005. “The Politics of Accountability in National Forest Planning.” Administration and Society 37: 57–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masum, F., U.E. Chigbu, J. Espinoza, and C. Graefen. 2016. “The Limitations of Formal Land Delivery System: Need for a Pro-Poor Urban Land Development Policy in Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Paper presented at the World Bank Land and Poverty Conference, Washington, DC, March 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Molebatsi, C. 2004. “Understanding the Coexistence of the Tribal Land Act and Town and Country Planning Act in Botswana's Urban Villages.” In Local Case Studies in African Land Law, edited by R. Home, 137–156. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nyasulu, T.U. 2012. “Governance and Customary Land Tenure in Peri-Urban Kasoa in Ghana.” PhD diss., University of Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. 2010. Review of Collaborative Governance: Factors Crucial to the Internal Workings of the Collaborative Process. Ecologic Research Report 10, April. Nelson: Ecologic Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G., A. Durand-Lasserve, and C. Rakod. 2009. “The Limits of Land Titling and Home Ownership.” Environment and Urbanization 21 (2): 443–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simbizi, M.C., R.M. Bennett, and J. Zevenbergen. 2016. “Pro-Poor Land Administration.” In Advances in Responsible Land Administration, edited by J. Zevenbergen, W. De Vries, and R.M. Bennett, 17–36. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.R. 2009. “Institutional Determinants of Collaboration: An Empirical Study of County Open-Space Protection.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tippett, J., J.F. Handley, and J. Ravetz. 2009. “Meeting the Challenges of Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Appraisal of a New Methodology for Participatory Ecological Planning.” Progress in Planning 67 (1): 9–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutu, D.O., L.A. Asante, M.N. Appiah, T. Bendzko, and U.E. Chigbu. 2016. “Towards a Pro-Poor Customary Land Rights Security in Rural Ghana: Land Tenure Inventory Using Mobile Application by Local Youth.” Paper presented at the World Bank Land and Poverty Conference, Washington, DC, March 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2004. Global Campaign for Secure Tenure: A Tool for Advocating the Provision of Adequate Shelter for the Urban Poor. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2008. Secure Land Rights for All. Nairobi: GLTN/UN-Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2009. “‘The Planned City Sweeps the Poor Away…’ Urban Planning and 21st Century Urbanisation.” Progress in Planning 72 (3): 151–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. Doing Business 2010. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. Getting to Green: A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy Tools for Growth and Competitiveness. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, J.A., C. Augustinus, D. Antonio, and R.M. Bennett. 2013. “Pro-Poor Land Administration: Principles for Recording the Land Rights of the Underrepresented.” Land Use Policy 31: 595–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar