Convergent validity between willingness to pay elicitation methods: an application to Grand Canyon whitewater boaters

References

• Adamowicz, W., M. Boxall, J.J. Williams, and J.J. Louviere. 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, R.C., K.J. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, R.M. Baumgartner, and P.R. Rathbun. 1987. “Glen Canyon Dam Releases and Downstream Recreation: An Analysis of User Preferences and Economic Values.” In Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Report no. GCES/27/87. Springfield, VA: Huberlein-Baumgartner Research Service. Submitted to Bureau of Reclamation. National Technical Information Service. NTIS report PB88-182546/AS, Madison, WI. http://www.gcmrc.gov/library/reports/cultural/Recreation/Bishop1987.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, J.M., and John R. Stoll. 1988. “Use of Dichotomous Choice Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 372–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, P., W. Adamowicz, J. Swait, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1996. “A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 18: 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Kevin J., and Richard C. Bishop. 1987. “Valuing Wildlife in Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species.” Water Resources Research 23 (5): 943–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, K.J., M.P. Welsh, and R.C. Bishop. 1993. “The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent-Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1): S80–S99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T.C., J.G. Taylor, and B. Shelby. 1991. “Assessing the Direct Effects of Streamflow on Recreation: A Literature Review.” Water Resources Bulletin 27 (6): 979–989.
   Google Scholar
• Burmil, S., T.C. Daniel, and J.D. Hetherington. 1999. “Human Values and Perceptions of Water in Arid Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 44: 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A. 1988. “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 355–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, R.G, D.S. Brookshire, and W.D. Schulze. 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent-Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Allenheld.
   Google Scholar
• Fearnley, N., K. Saelensminde, and K. Veisten. 2008. “Combining Choice Experiments with Contingent Valuation and the Frisch Elicitation Method.” International Journal of Transport Economics 35 (3): 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GCNP (Grand Canyon National Park). 2006. “Colorado River Management Plan.” Grand Canyon, AZ: Office of Planning and Compliance, Grand Canyon National Park, Department of Interior. https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/management/upload/CRMPIF_s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W.M. 1984. “Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W.M. 1989. “Welfare Evaluation In Contingent Valuation with Discrete Response: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 1057–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., S. Mourato, and R.E. Wright. 2001. “Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation?” Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (3): 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., R.E. Wright, and V. Adamowicz. 1998. “Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment: Design Issues, Current Experience and Future Prospects.” Environmental and Resource Economics 11 (3–4): 413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Jie, Jérôme Dupras, and Thomas G. Poder. 2017. “The Value of Wetlands in Quebec: A Comparison Between Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (1): 51–78. doi:10.1080/21606544.2016.1199976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalte, K., A. Norinder, and A. Trawén. 2000. “Conjoint Analysis Versus Contingent Valuation: Estimating Risk Values and Death Risk Equivalents in Road Traffic.” In Behavioural Modelling: Proceedings of Seminar F Held at the European Transport Conference, 139–147. Cambridge, UK: PTRC (Planning & Transport Research & Computation) Education and Research Services.
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky, Itzhak, and A. Leslie Robb. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–719.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis J., and J. McTernan. 2014. “Economic Value of Instream Flow for Non-Commercial Whitewater Boating Using Recreation Demand and Contingent Valuation Methods.” Environmental Management 53: 510–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1986. “The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research.” Marketing Science 5 (4): 275–297.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S.D., M.E. Wilkosz, and S.K. Brickler. 1990. “The Recreational Impact of Reducing the Laughing Waters of Aravaipa Creek, Arizona.” Rivers 1 (1): 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Morwitz, V.G., J.H. Steckel, and A. Gupta. 2007. “When Do Purchase Intentions Predict Sales?” International Journal of Forecasting 23: 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelt, D., and K. Train. 1998. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 647–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2011. “SAS/STAT Users Guide.” 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, Christian A., Maurice Doyon, and Daniel Rondeau. 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4: 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, Christian A., and Mary Evans. 2009. “Bridging the Gap Between the Field and the Lab: Environmental Goods, Policy Maker Input and Consequentiality.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58: 338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar