Advancing voluntary chemical governance? The case of the Swedish textile industry dialogue

References

• Assmuth, T., P. Häkkinen, J. Heiskanen, P. Kautto, P. Lindh, T. Mattila, J. Mehtonen, and K. Saarinen. 2011. Risk Management and Governance of Chemicals in Articles: Case Study Textiles. Helsinki: Finnish Environmental Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M., and M. Karlsson. 2013. “Responsible Procurement, Complex Product Chains and the Integration of Vertical and Horizontal Governance.” Environmental Policy and Governance 23 (6): 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M., and M. Micheletti. 2016. “Introducing the Sustainability Challenge of Textiles and Clothing.” Journal of Consumer Policy 39 (4): 367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Kanyama, A., A-L. Lindén, and E. Lundell. 2006. Miljöpolitik och Styrmedel: Fallstudie Kläder. [ Environmental Politics and Instruments: Case study, Clothing] TRITA-KET-M 2006:17. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, F.P., A. Nentjes, and N. Odam. 2012. “Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Lessons on Effectiveness, Efficiency and Spillover Potential.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 6: 119–152.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas, M.A., and M.J. Montes-Sancho. 2010. “Voluntary Agreements to Improve Environmental Quality: Symbolic and Substantive Cooperation.” Strategic Management Journal 31: 575–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, J., M. Gilek, and C. Rudén, eds. 2010. Regulating Chemical Risks: European and Global Challenges. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• European Community. 2001. “General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on General Product Safety.” Official Journal of the European Communities L11, 15/1/2002: 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• European Community. 2006. “Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).” Official Journal of the European Union L 396, 30/12/2006: 1–849.
   Google Scholar
• European Community. 2008. “Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.” Official Journal of the European Union L 353, 31/12/2008: 1–1355.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2009. “Environmental Law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures.” Journal of Environmental Law 21 (2): 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2016. “The Swedish Administrative Model.” In The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics, edited by J. Pierre, 299–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., and D. Lehmkuhl. 2008. “Introduction: The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance.” Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, B., J. Pierre, and G. Sundström. 2015. Governing the Embedded State: The Organizational Dimension of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., R.K.W. Wurzel, and A. Zito. 2005. “The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?” Political Studies 53 (3): 477–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, M., and K. Brouhle. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Voluntary Environmental Initiatives.” In Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives, edited by M. A. Delmas and O. R. Young, 144–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and N. Darnall. 2016. “Business as a Collaborative Partner: Understanding Firms’ Sociopolitical Support for Policy Formation.” Public Administration Review 76 (2): 326–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén, A-L., and A. Carlsson-Kanyama. 2007. “Globalisation of Markets and Products: A Challenge for Environmental Policy.” International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 6 (4): 473–487.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, R.M. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T.P., and J.W. Maxwell. 2007. “Environmental Public Voluntary Programs Reconsidered.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (4): 723–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffet, J. and F. Bregha. 1999. “An Overview of Issues with Respect to Voluntary Environmental Agreements.” Paper presented at the CAVA Workshop “The World-Wide Use of Voluntary Approaches - State of the Art and National Patterns,” Gent, Belgium, November 26–27, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, D., A. Sandström, and P. Söderholm. 2017. “Network Management and Renewable Energy Development: An Analytical Framework with Empirical Illustrations.” Energy Research and Social Science 23: 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association 1997.” The American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and S. Crawford. 2005. “Classifying Rules.” In Understanding Institutional Diversity, edited by E. Ostrom, 186–215. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E.C. 2012. Policy Without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., and M. Potoski. 2007. “Collective Action Through Voluntary Environmental Programs: A Club Theory Perspective.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (4): 773–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, J., P. de Leon, and C. Koerber. 2006. “Is Greener Whiter Yet? The Sustainable Slopes Program After Five Years.” Policy Studies Journal 34 (2): 195–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCA. 2011. Handlingsplan för en Giftfri Vardag 2011–2014. Skydda Barnen Bättre. Sundbyberg: SCA.
   Google Scholar
• SCA. 2013. Hazardous Chemicals in Textiles: Report of a Government Assignment. Report No. 3/13. Stockholm: SCA.
   Google Scholar
• SCA. 2015a. Utvärderingav Arbetet med Branschdialoger. PM No. 4/15. Stockholm: SCA.
   Google Scholar
• SCA. 2015b. Handlingsplan för en giftfri vardag 2011–2014 slutredovisning. Report No. 1/15. Stockholm: SCA.
   Google Scholar
• Segerson, K. 2013. “Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection and Resource Management.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 5: 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, H. 2010. Global Governance of Hazardous Chemicals: Challenges of Multilevel Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Offices. 2004. The Product Safety Act. Swedish Code of Statutes 2004:541. Stockholm: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Consumer Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. 2010. Uppdrag till Kemikalieinspektionen om Framtagande och Genomförande av Handlingsplan för en Giftfri Vardag. Government Decision 2010-12-22. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. 2013. På Väg mot en Giftfri Vardag – Plattform för Kemikaliepolitiken. Government Bill 2013/14:39. Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., S. Pollard, S. Rocks, and A. Angus. 2012. “Selecting Policy Instruments for Better Environmental Regulation: A Critique and Future Research Agenda.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (4): 268–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environmental Program. 2011. The Chemicals in Products Project: Case Study of the Textiles Sector. Geneva: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Kerkhof, M. 2006. “Making a Difference: On the Constraints of Consensus Building and the Relevance of Deliberation in Stakeholder Dialogues.” Policy Sciences 39 (3): 279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2008. “Private Global Business Regulation.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar