A participatory decision support system for contaminated brownfield redevelopment: a case study from France

References

• ADEME. 2011. La gestion intégrée des sols, des eaux souterraines et des sédiments pollués - Feuille de route stratégique. La Possonnière, France: ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie).
   Google Scholar
• ADEME. 2012. Taux d’utilisation et Coûts Des Différentes Techniques et Filières de Traitements Des Sols et Eaux Souterraines Pollués En France. Synthèse Des Données 2010. La Possonnière, France: ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie) - French Environment and Energy Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• ADEME. 2015. Surveillance quadriennale de la qualité des eaux souterraines et dossier de servitudes. ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie) - French Environment and Energy Management Agency. La Possonnière, France: ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie).
   Google Scholar
• Alberini, A., A. Longo, S. Tonin, F. Trombetta, and M. Turvani. 2005. “The Role of Liability, Regulation and Economic Incentives in Brownfield Remediation and Redevelopment: Evidence from Surveys of Developers.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 35 (4): 327–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2015. “Policy Instruments and the Remediation and Redevelopment of Contaminated Properties.” Environmental Politics 24 (1): 75–95. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.954770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alker, S., V. Joy, P. Roberts, and N. Smith. 2000. “The Definition of Brownfield.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 (1): 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., J. Norrman, P.-E. Back, T. Söderqvist, and L. Rosén. 2018. “What’s the Point? The Contribution of a Sustainability View in Contaminated Site Remediation.” Science of the Total Environment 630: 103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvai, J. L., R. Gregory, and T. L. McDaniels. 2001. “Testing a Structured Decision Approach: Value-Focused Thinking for Deliberative Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 21 (6): 1065–1076. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.216175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartke, S. 2011. “Valuation of Market Uncertainties for Contaminated Land.” International Journal of Strategic Property Management 15 (4): 356–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartke, S., S. Martinát, P. Klusáček, L. Pizzol, F. Alexandrescu, B. Frantál, A. Critto, and A. Zabeo. 2016. “Targeted Selection of Brownfields from Portfolios for Sustainable Regeneration: User Experiences from Five Cases Testing the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool.” Journal of Environmental Management, Sustainable Remediation 184: 94–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.037.
   Google Scholar
• Bartke, S., and R. Schwarze. 2015. “No Perfect Tools: Trade-Offs of Sustainability Principles and User Requirements in Designing Support Tools for Land-Use Decisions Between Greenfields and Brownfields.” Journal of Environmental Management 153: 11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beames, A., S. Broekx, R. Lookman, K. Touchant, and P. Seuntjens. 2014. “Sustainability Appraisal Tools for Soil and Groundwater Remediation: How Is the Choice of Remediation Alternative Influenced by Different Sets of Sustainability Indicators and Tool Structures?” Science of the Total Environment 470–471: 954–66. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouyssou, D., T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukiàs, and P. Vincke. 2000. “Comparing on the Basis of Several Attributes: The Example of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.” In Evaluation and Decision Models; A Critical Perspective, edited by D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, and M. Pirlot, 91–152. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 32. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burinskienė, M., V. Bielinskas, A. Podviezko, V. Gurskienė, and V. Maliene. 2017. “Evaluating the Significance of Criteria Contributing to Decision-Making on Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas.” Sustainability 9 (5): 759. doi: 10.3390/su9050759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappuyns, V., and B. Kessen. 2014. “Combining Life Cycle Analysis, Human Health and Financial Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Contaminated Site Remediation.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (7): 1101–1121. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2013.783460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, F., S. Geertman, M. Kuffer, and Q. Zhan. 2011. “An Integrative Methodology to Improve Brownfield Redevelopment Planning in Chinese Cities: A Case Study of Futian, Shenzhen.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 35 (5): 388–398. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysochoou, M., K. Brown, G. Dahal, C. Granda-Carvajal, K. Segerson, N. Garrick, and A. Bagtzoglou. 2012. “A GIS and Indexing Scheme to Screen Brownfields for Area-Wide Redevelopment Planning.” Landscape and Urban Planning 105 (3): 187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli, M., S. R. Coles, and K. Kirwan. 2014. “Analysis of the Potentials of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Methods to Conduct Sustainability Assessment.” Ecological Indicators 46 (Suppl C):138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, M. 2005. “Developing Geographical Professional Abilities: Experiences in Egypt and Brazil.” In Changing Horizons in Geography Education, edited by Karl Donert and Przemysław Charzyński, 314–319. Torun: Herodot Network.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, C. A. 2006. “Unearthing the Benefits of Brownfield to Green Space Projects: An Examination of Project Use and Quality of Life Impacts.” Local Environment 11 (5): 577–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias-Sardinha, I., J. Primdahl, D. Kraveiro, and L. Kristensen. 2012. “Participatory Processes for Strategic Spatial Planning on Two Rural Regions: The Case of Sao Domingos Mine, Alentejo, Portugal and the Case of Lihme, Jutland, Denmark.” In The Political Ecology of Depopulation: Inequality, Landscape and People, edited by Ángel Paniagua, Raymond Bryant, and Thanasis Kizos, 151–172. CEDDAR Book Series 18. CEDDAR-Centro de Estudios sobre la Despoblación y Desarrollo de Áreas Rurales. Zaragoza, Spain: Universidad de Zaragoza.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsey, J. W. 2003. “Brownfields and Greenfields: The Intersection of Sustainable Development and Environmental Stewardship.” Environmental Practice 5 (1):69–76. doi: 10.1017/S1466046603030187.
   Google Scholar
• Duijn, M., A. van Buuren, M. Sparrevik, A. Slob, G. J. Ellen, and A. Oen. 2016. “Getting Caught up in the Game: Managing Non-Formal Dynamics in the Remediation of Contaminated Sediments in Oslo Harbor.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59 (5): 927–947. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1047490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. S. 2005. “Maut – Multiattribute Utility Theory.” In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, edited by J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrogot. 265–292. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_7.
   Google Scholar
• English, M. R., A. K. Gibson, D. L. Feldman, and B. E. Tonn. 1993. Stakeholder Involvement: Open Processes for Reaching Decisions About the Future Uses of Contaminated Sites. Final Report. Knoxville, TN: Waste Management Research and Education Institute, University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, eds. 2004. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer’s International Series. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira, J. R., S. Greco, B. Roy, and R. Słowiński. 2013. “An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and Their Recent Extensions: ELECTRE METHODS.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 20 (1–2): 61–85. doi: 10.1002/mcda.1482.
   Google Scholar
• Filip, S., and P. Cecean. 2012. “Urban Industrial Brownfields: Constraints and Opportunities in Romania.” Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 7 (4): 155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floc’hlay, B., and E. Plottu. 1998. “Democratic Evaluation: From Empowerment Evaluation to Public Decision-Making.” Evaluation 4 (3): 261–277. doi: 10.1177/13563899822208590.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. R., and S. E. Jackson. 2008. “Promoting Community Involvement at Brownfields Sites in Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (5): 615–630. doi: 10.1080/09640560802210971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamboa, G. 2006. “Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Different Development Scenarios of the Aysén Region, Chile.” Ecological Economics 59 (1): 157–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Western Australia 2014. “Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites: Contaminated Sites Guideline.” Guideline. http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/125787/new-contaminated-sites-guidelines-in-western-australia.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., and M. B. Jepsen. 2016. “ELECTRE: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Methodologies and Applications.” European Journal of Operational Research 250 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, D. 2003. “Market Failures and the Optimal Use of Brownfield Redevelopment Policy Instruments.” Paper presented at the National Brownfields Redevelopment Strategy Session, National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, 37th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Economics Association. Ottawa, ON, May 31, 2003. http://economics.ca/2003/papers/0245.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hazebrouck, B., C. Baumont, and C. Legout. 2008. Guide Pour l’implication Des Populations Dans l’évaluation et La Gestion d’un Site Ou Sol Pollué. Angers, France: ADEME, INERIS.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, I. B., J. Keisler, and I. Linkov. 2011. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends.” Science of the Total Environment 409 (19): 3578–3594. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janikowski, R., R. Kucharski, and A. Sas-Nowosielska. 2000. “Multi-Criteria and Multi-Perspective Analysis of Contaminated Land Management Methods.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 60 (2): 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. 1993rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiker, G. A., T. S. Bridges, A. Varghese, T. P. Seager, and I. Linkov. 2005. “Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 1 (2): 95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontogianni, A., M. S. Skourtos, I. H. Langford, I. J. Bateman, and S. Georgiou. 2001. “Integrating Stakeholder Analysis in Non-Market Valuation of Environmental Assets.” Ecological Economics 37 (1): 123–38. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00270-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., M. A. Casey, J. Donner, S. Kirsch, and J. N. Maack. 2001. Designing and Conducting Focus Group Interviews. Social Development Papers 31. Social Analysis: Selected Tools and Techniques. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, J., S. Martinát, P. Tonev, and B. Frantál. 2014. “Destiny of Urban Brownfields: Spatial Patterns and Perceived Consequences of Post-Socialistic Deindustrialization.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 41: 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Laprise, M., S. Lufkin, and E. Rey. 2015. “An Indicator System for the Assessment of Sustainability Integrated into the Project Dynamics of Regeneration of Disused Urban Areas.” Building and Environment 86: 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leger, C., C. Balch, and S. Essex. 2016. “Understanding the Planning Challenges of Brownfield Development in Coastal Urban Areas of England.” Planning Practice and Research 31 (2):119–131. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1146428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, I., A. Varghese, S. Jamil, T. P. Seager, G. Kiker, and T. Bridges. 2005. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites.” In Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making, edited by Igor Linkov, 15–54. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mateus, R. J. G., J. C. Bana e Costa, and P. V. Matos. 2016. “Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions.” Group Decision and Negotiation 26 (3): 495–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, P., and S. Bigaret. 2012. “Diviz: A Software for Modeling, Processing and Sharing Algorithmic Workflows in MCDA.” Edited by Luis Cândido Dias, Carlos Henggeler Antunes, and David Rios Ínsua.” Intelligent Decision Technologies 6 (4): 283–296. doi: 10.3233/IDT-2012-0144.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère de l’Environnement, and de lÉnergie e de L Mer. 2017. “Introduction à La Méthodologie Nationale de Gestion Des Sites et Sols Pollués,”. Direction Génénéral de la Prévention des Risques, bureau du sol et du sous-sol. Avril 2017. http://ssp-infoterre.brgm.fr/sites/default/files/upload/documents/intro_methodo_ssp_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22 (1): 129–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morio, M., S. Schädler, and M. Finkel. 2013. “Applying a Multi-Criteria Genetic Algorithm Framework for Brownfield Reuse Optimization: Improving Redevelopment Options Based on Stakeholder Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Management 130: 331–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, V. 1995. “Eliciting Information Concerning the Relative Importance of Criteria.” In Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, edited by Panos M. Pardalos, Yannis Siskos, and Constantin Zopounidis, vol. 5, 17–43. Boston: Springer US. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2383-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, L., U. Ferber, D. Grimski, K. Millar, and P. Nathanail. 2005. “The Scale and Nature of European Brownfields.” In CABERNET 2005 International Conference on Managing Urban Land., edited by L. Oliver, K. Millar, D. Grimski, U. Ferber, and C. P. Nathanail, 274–281. Nottingham, UK: Land Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwubuya, K., A. Cundy, M. Puschenreiter, J. Kumpiene, B. Bone, J. Greaves, P. Teasdale., et al. 2009. “Developing Decision Support Tools for the Selection of ‘Gentle’ Remediation Approaches.” Science of the Total Environment 407 (24): 6132–6142. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pediaditi, K., K. J. Doick, and A. J. Moffat. 2010. “Monitoring and Evaluation Practice for Brownfield, Regeneration to Greenspace Initiatives.” Landscape and Urban Planning 97 (1): 22–36. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, R., M. Gracia, and E. Rey. 2013. “A Multi-Criteria Approach to Compare Urban Renewal Scenarios for an Existing Neighborhood: Case Study in Lausanne (Switzerland).” Building and Environment 65: 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzol, L., A. Zabeo, P. Klusáček, E. Giubilato, A. Critto, B. Frantál, S. Martinát, J. Kunc, R. Osman, and S. Bartke. 2016. “Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool to Support Effective Brownfield Regeneration.” Journal of Environmental Management 166:178–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plottu, B., and É. Plottu. 2010. “Modèle Pour l’opérationnalité de l’évaluation Démocratique (MODE): Quelques Précisions et Enrichissements.” Paper presented at la Conférence OPDE (des Outils pour Décider Ensemble) ‐ Aide à la Décision et à la Gouvernance, Montpellier, France, Octobre 25‐26, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Plottu, E., and B. Plottu. 2007. “The Concept of Total Economic Value of Environment: A Reconsideration Within a Hierarchical Rationality.” Ecological Economics 61 (1): 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plottu, E., and B. Plottu. 2012. “Total Landscape Values: A Multi-Dimensional Approach.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55 (6): 797–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, S., A. Brookes, N. Earl, J. Lowe, T. Kearney, and C. Nathanail. 2004. “Integrating Decision Tools for the Sustainable Management of Land Contamination.” Science of the Total Environment 325 (1–3): 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Res Publica, Institut de la concertation et de la participation citoyenne, and Harris Interactive. 2017. 4ème édition du baromètre de la concertation et de la décision publique. Baromètre de la concertation et de la décision publique. Paris: Res Publica. http://www.respublica-conseil.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Barom%C3%A8tre-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, L., P. E. Back, T. Söderqvist, J. Norrman, P. Brinkhoff, T. Norberg, Y. Volchko, M. Norin, M. Bergknut, and G. Döberl. 2015. “SCORE: A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach to Assessing the Sustainability of Contaminated Land Remediation.” Science of the Total Environment 511: 621–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, B. 1985. Méthodologie Multicritère d’aide à La Décision. Paris: Economica. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/2914.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., and D. Bouyssou. 1993. Aide Multicritère à La Décision: Méthodes et Cas. 1993. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., and R. Słowiński. 2013. “Questions Guiding the Choice of a Multicriteria Decision Aiding Method.” EURO Journal on Decision Processes 1 (1–2): 69–97. doi: 10.1007/s40070-013-0004-7.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., and D. Vanderpooten. 1996. “The European School of MCDA: Emergence, Basic Features and Current Works.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5 (1): 22–38. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199603)5:1<22::AID-MCDA93>3.0.CO;2-F.
   Google Scholar
• Sagoff, M. 1998. “Aggregation and Deliberation in Valuing Environmental Public Goods.” Ecological Economics 24 (2–3): 213–230. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00144-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santé Canada, Secrétariat de la consultation ministérielle, and Direction générale des communications et de la consultation 2000. Santé Canada–politiques et boîte à outils concernant la participation du public à la prise de décisions. Ottawa: Santé Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, E. 2005. Evaluation Research Methods. Editor and Introductory Essay for a 4 Volume Collection in ’Benchmark Series in Social Research Methods’. London: Sage. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/3725/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. R. 2003. “Brownfield Redevelopment: Information Issues and the Affected Public.” Environmental Practice 5 (1): 62–68. doi: 10.1017/S1466046603030175.
   Google Scholar
• Turvani, M., S. Tonin, and A. Alberini. 2010. “Stakeholder Preferences for Contaminated Land Clean-up and Redevelopment Programmes in Italy.” Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal 3 (3): 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA - Environmental Protection Agency 2005. Superfund Benefits Analysis. Partial Draft Prepared for Review by the EPA Science Advisory Board’s Superfund Benefits Analysis Advisory Panel. Charlottesville: EPA Science Advisory Board’s Superfund Benefits Analysis Advisory Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Van Liedekerke, M., G. Prokop, S. Rabl-Berger, M. Kibblewhite, and G. Louwagie. 2014. Progress in the Management of Contaminated Sites in Europe. EUR 26376 EN. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre - Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. 2009. “An Institutional Analysis of Methods for Environmental Appraisal.” Ecological Economics 68 (8–9): 2207–2215. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincke, P. 1998. L’aide Multicritère à La Décision. Statistique et Mathématiques Appliquées. Édition de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgique: Ellipses Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, N. B., F. Lawrenz, and R. Haroldson. 2009. “A Judicial Presentation of Evidence of a Student Culture of ‘Dealing.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (4): 421–441. doi: 10.1002/tea.20272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., P. Tiwari, S. S. Han, and T.-K. Chan. 2017. “Brownfield Risk Communication and Evaluation.” Journal of Property Research 34 (3): 233–250. doi: 10.1080/09599916.2017.1320684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenarios, S., and I. Tziritis. 2007. “Improving Pluralism in Multi Criteria Decision Aid Approach Through Focus Group Technique and Content Analysis.” Ecological Economics 62 (3–4): 692–703. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C. 1997. “The European School of MCDA: Some Recent Trends.” In Multicriteria Analysis, 608–616. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_61.
   Google Scholar