A decision support framework for sustainable highway alignment embracing variant preferences of stakeholders: case of China Pakistan economic corridor

References

• Ali, G. 2017. “What We Get Right and Wrong on CPEC.” The Friday Times, June 23. https://www.thefridaytimes.com/what-we-get-right-and-wrong-on-cpec/.
   Google Scholar
• Alshamrani, O., A. Alshibani, and M. Alogaili. 2018. “Analytic Hierarchy Process Multi Attribute Utility Theory Based Approach for the Selection of Lighting Systems in Residential Buildings: A Case Study.” Buildings 8 (6): 73. doi:10.3390/buildings8060073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif, F. 2013. “Decision Support Framework for Infrastructure Maintenance Investment Decision Making.” Florida International University. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000372.
   Google Scholar
• Aultman, S., and A. Lari. 2009. “Advanced Acquisition of Right-of-Way: Best Practices and Corridor Case Studies.” St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation, Research Services Section.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, S., and C. Kahraman. 2014. “Vehicle Selection for Public Transportation Using an Integrated Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach: A Case of Ankara.” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 26 (5): 2467–2481. doi:10.3233/IFS-130917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babashamsi, P., A. Golzadfar, N. I. Md Yusoff, H. Ceylan, and N. G. Md Nor. 2016. “Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and VIKOR Method in the Prioritization of Pavement Maintenance Activities.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 9 (2): 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, H. 2017. “The Southern Link: A Long and Winding Road of Controversy.” Stuff, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Belton, V., and T. J. Stewart. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Science + Business Media, B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlender, G., A. Kaufmann, and M. M. Gupta. 1986. “Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic, Theory and Applications.” Mathematics of Computation 47 (176): 762–763. doi:10.2307/2008199.
   Google Scholar
• Bosurgi, G., O. Pellegrino, and G. Sollazzo. 2013. “A PSO Highway Alignment Optimization Algorithm Considering Environmental Constraints.” Advances in Transportation Studies 31 (31): 63–80. doi:10.4399/97888548663245.
   Google Scholar
• Boutkhoum, O., M. Hanine, T. Agouti, and A. Tikniouine. 2017. “A Decision-Making Approach Based on Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Methodology for Selecting the Appropriate Cloud Solution to Manage Big Data Projects.” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 8 (s2): 1237–1253. doi:10.1007/s13198-017-0592-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., M. Q. Patton, and R. A. Bowman. 2011. “Working with Evaluation Stakeholders: A Rationale, Step-Wise Approach and Toolkit.” Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, J. J. 1985. “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (3): 233–247. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabot, J., S., Easterbrook, J. Horkoff, L. Lessard, S. Liaskos, and J. N. Mazón. 2009. “Integrating Sustainability in Decision-Making Processes: A Modelling Strategy.” 31st International Conference on Software Engineering - Companion Volume, ICSE 2009, 207–210. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICSE-COMPANION.2009.5070983.
   Google Scholar
• Caldas, C. H. 2006. “TxDOT Guidebook for Right-of-Way Valuations and Negotiations.” http://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_5379_P2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Çalişkan, E., Ş. Bediroglu, and V. Yildirim. 2019. “Determination Forest Road Routes via Gis-Based Spatial Multi-Criterion Decision Methods.” Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17 (1): 759–779. doi:10.15666/aeer/1701_759779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalişkan, E. 2017. “Planning of Environmentally Sound Forest Road Route Using GIS and S-MCDM.” Šumarski List 141 (11–12): 583–591. doi:10.31298/sl.141.11-12.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, E. 2013. “Planning of Forest Road Network and Analysis in Mountainous Area.” Life Science Journal 10 (02): 2456–2465. http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1002/341_B01496life1002_2456_2465.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, V., and J. H. M. Tah. 2001. “A Fuzzy Approach to Construction Project Risk Assessment and Analysis: Construction Project Risk Management System.” Advances in Engineering Software 32 (10–11): 847–857. doi:10.1016/S0965-9978(01)00036-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamodrakas, I., and D. Martakos. 2012. “A Utility-Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Energy Efficient Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks.” Applied Soft Computing Journal 12 (7): 1929–1938. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., and J. Wang. 2009. “Application of a Fuzzy AHP Method to Risk Assessment of International Construction Projects.” In 2009 International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, 459–462. IEEE. doi:10.1109/ECBI.2009.14.
   Google Scholar
• CMPRU. 2015. “China Pakistan Economic Corridor? The Route Controversy.” Chief Minister’s Policy Reform Unit. https://www.academia.edu/35153865/CPEC_The_Route_Controversy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, F., K. Hanaki, T. Aramaki, and S. Connors. 2008. “Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process to Analyze Stakeholders Preferences for Municipal Solid Waste Management Plans, Boston, USA.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52 (7): 979–991. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangana, S. Z. 2015. A Decision Support Framework for Selecting Innovative Sustainable Technologies for Delivering Low Carbon Retail Buildings. Plymouth: Plymouth University. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/29b9/a2fcfc2f6e77e8a32fbea35d0f98be2f363a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dawn 2018. “People Affected by Road Project Threaten Protest.” DAWN. https://www.dawn.com/news/1413954.
   Google Scholar
• Doczy, R. 2014. “Building’s Sustainability Analysis: Analytical Hierarchy Process to Analyze Cost, LEED Credits, and Carbon Neutrality Utilizing a Building Information Modeling Platform.” Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Doczy, R., and Y. Abdel Razig. 2017. “Green Buildings Case Study Analysis Using AHP and MAUT in Sustainability and Costs.” Journal of Architectural Engineering 23 (3): 05017002. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, T. P. 2016. “Multicriteria Multistakeholder Decision Analysis: Applications to Transportation Planning.” Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Eason, T., D. E. Meyer, M. A. Curran, and V. K. K. Upadhyayula. 2011. Guidance to Facilitate Decisions for Sustainable Nanotechnology. EPA/600/R-11/107, 2011. Washington, DC: National Risk Management Research Laboratory; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=238589
   Google Scholar
• Effat, H. A., and O. A. Hassan. 2013. “Designing and Evaluation of Three Alternative Highway Routes Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Least-Cost Path Analysis, Application in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt.” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science 16 (2): 141–151. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Eldrandaly, K., N. Eldin, and D. Sui. 2003. “A COM-Based Spatial Decision Support System for Industrial Site Selection.” Journal of Geographical Information and Decision Analysis 7 (2): 72–92.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, A. 2009. “Route/Site Selection of Urban Transportation Facilities: An Integrated GIS/MCDM Approach.” In 7th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking, 169–184. Budapest: Óbuda University. https://ideas.repec.org/h/pkk/meb009/169-184.html.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, A. 2014. Appraisal and Development of Transportation Systems Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methodology. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Farooq, A., M. Xie, S. Stoilova, and F. Ahmad. 2019. “Multicriteria Evaluation of Transport Plan for High-Speed Rail: An Application to Beijing-Xiongan.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2019: 1–23. doi:10.1155/2019/8319432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, A., M. Xie, S. Stoilova, F. Ahmad, M. Guo, E. J. Williams, V. K. Gahlot, D. Yan, and A. Mahamat Issa. 2018. “Transportation Planning Through GIS and Multicriteria Analysis: Case Study of Beijing and XiongAn.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 2018: 1–16. doi:10.1155/2018/2696037.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. 2007. “The Transportation Planning Process: Key Issues, a Briefing Book for Transportation Decision Makers.” Officials, and Staff, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration. doi:FHWA-HEP-07-039.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. G., D. V. S. D. Souza, J. L. D. Ribeiro, and M. E. Echeveste. 2013. “A Framework for Decision-Making in Investment Alternatives Selection.” International Journal of Production Research 51 (19): 5866–5883. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.802393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, L., Valim de, A. P. Barbosa Rodrigues de Freitas, E. V. Veraszto, F. A. S. Marins, and M. B. Silva. 2013. “Decision-Making with Multiple Criteria Using AHP and MAUT: An Industrial Application.” European International Journal of Science and Technology 2 (9): 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gardziejczyk, W., and P. Zabicki. 2014. “The Influence of the Scenario and Assessment Method on the Choice of Road Alignment Variants.” Transport Policy 36: 294–305. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. I., and T. Rapcsák. 2004. “Singular Value Decomposition in AHP.” European Journal of Operational Research 154: 573–584. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00755-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem, A. 2007. “Real-Time Construction Project Progress Tracking: A Hybrid Model for Wireless Technologies Selection, Assessment, and Implementation.” PhD Thesis, Florida State University. https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:182481/datastream/PDF/view.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo, F. 2013. “Conflictos Por El Tipnis ‘Metieron Miedo’ a Financiadores de Carreteras En Beni.” Grupo Fides. http://www.radiofides.com/index_old.php/noticia/social/Conflictos_por_el_Tipnis_metieron_miedo__a_financiadores_de_carreteras_en_Beni.
   Google Scholar
• Güngör, Z., G. Serhadlioǧlu, and S. E. Kesen. 2009. “A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection Problem.” Applied Soft Computing Journal 9 (2): 641–646. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, M. 2016. “Higher Cost of Havelian-Thakot Road under CPEC Raises Questions.” The News International. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/95263-Higher-cost-of-Havelian-Thakot-road-under-CPEC-raises-questions.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. 2005. Estimation of Cost Overrun Risk in International Projects by Using Fuzzy Set Theory. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Handfield, R., S. V. Walton, R. Sroufe, and S. A. Melnyk. 2002. “Applying Environmental Criteria to Supplier Assessment: A Study in the Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process.” European Journal of Operational Research 141 (1): 70–87. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong-Zhi, Y., G. Li-Pin, and X. Jin-Liang. 2011. “Multi-Objective Optimization Model of Highway Alignment.” In 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, ICCSN 2011, 585–590. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6013974.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, I. B., J. Keisler, and I. Linkov. 2011. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Sciences: Ten Years of Applications and Trends.” Science of the Total Environment 409 (19): 3578–3594. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iç, Y. T. 2012. “An Experimental Design Approach Using TOPSIS Method for the Selection of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Technologies.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 28 (2): 245–256. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2011.09.005..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanović, I., D. Grujičić, D. Macura, J. Jović, and N. Bojović. 2013. “One Approach for Road Transport Project Selection.” Transport Policy 25: 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, M. K. 2003. “Criteria-Based Decision Support System for Selecting Highway Alignments.” Journal of Transportation Engineering 129 (1): 33–41. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:1(33).
   Google Scholar
• Jha, M. K., C. McCall, and P. Schonfeld. 2001. “Using GIS, Genetic Algorithms, and Visualization in Highway Development.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 16 (6): 399–414. doi:10.1111/0885-9507.00242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowit, J. 2009. “Conservationists Laud Poland’s Move to Re-Route Controversial Motorway.” The Guardian, October 23. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/oct/23/conservation-poland-motorway.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Infrastructure Management.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 10 (9): 1176–1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C. 2008. “Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Theory and Applications with Recent Developments.” In Springer Optimization and Its Applications. Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7_10.
   Google Scholar
• Kalamaras, G. S., L. Brino, G. Carrieri, and C. Pline. 2000. “Application of Multicriteria Analysis to Select the Best Highway Alignment.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 15 (04): 415–420. doi:10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00010-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Min Wook, M. K., Jha, and P. Schonfeld. 2012. “Applicability of Highway Alignment Optimization Models.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 21 (1): 257–286. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2011.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., R. Khodaverdi, L. Olfat, A. Jafarian, and A. Diabat. 2013. “Integrated Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Method and Multiobjective Programming Approach for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in a Green Supply Chain.” Journal of Cleaner Production 47: 355–367. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan, R., K. G. S. Venkatesan, and A. Chandrasekar. 2016. “A Comparison of Strengths and Weaknesses for Analytical Hierarchy Process.” Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 9 (3): 12–15. www.jchps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Kockelman, K. M., J. D., Heiner, S. Hakim, and J. Jarrett. 2004. Estimation of Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs in Texas. Project Summary Report. http://ctr.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubs/0_4079_S.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Konidari, P., and D. Mavrakis. 2007. “A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method for Climate Change Mitigation Policy Instruments.” Energy Policy 35: 6235–6257. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y-c, and S-t Lu. 2013. “Using Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach to Enhance Risk Assessment for Metropolitan Construction Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 31 (4): 602–614. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumawardani, R. P., and M. Agintiara. 2015. “Application of Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Method for Decision Making in Human Resource Manager Selection Process.” Procedia Computer Science 72: 638–646. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.173.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., and H. Bai. 2003. “Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHF with an Extent Analysis Approach.” IIE Transactions 35 (7): 619–626. doi:10.1080/07408170304355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, I., A. Varghese, S. Jamil, T.P. Seager, G. Kiker, and T. Bridges. 2004. “Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites.” In Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making, 15–54. Switzerland: Springer doi:10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Lisboa, M. V., and J. Waisman. 2006. “Multicriteria Analysis in the Selection of Urban Highway Alignment Alternatives with Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Environmentally Sustainable Approach.” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment 89: 595–604. doi:10.2495/UT060571.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S. T., and R. T. Clemen. 1992. “Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis.” Technometrics 34 (3): 365–366. doi:10.2307/1270059.
   Google Scholar
• Lokare, V. T., and P. M. Jadhav. 2016. “Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods for Decision Making in Best Course Selection after HSC.” In IEEE 2016 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2016, 1–6. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCCI.2016.7479937.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, M., G. Dell’Acqua, and R. Lamberti. 2012. “High-Speed Rail Track Design Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 54: 608–617. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.778.
   Google Scholar
• Madi, E. N., J. M. Garibaldi, and C. Wagner. 2016. “An Exploration of Issues and Limitations in Current Methods of Topsis and Fuzzy TOPSIS.” In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE 2016, 2098–2105. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2016.7737950.
   Google Scholar
• Maji, A., and M. K. Jha. 2009. “Multi-Objective Highway Alignment Optimization Using a Genetic Algorithm.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 43 (4): 481–504. doi:10.1002/atr.5670430405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2003. “Great Expectations - But Whose? Stakeholder Theory and Its Implications for Ethical Behaviour in Public Organisations.” In Management, Organisation, and Ethics in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2016. “Corridor Planning.” Ch. 17 in Transportation Planning Handbook, Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. doi:10.1002/9781119174660.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd, Z., Che Puan Othman, and S. M. Sajjad. 2015. “A Multivariate Methodology for Determining the Optimal Highway Alignment Candidate Based on Geographic Information System and AHP.” Jurnal Teknologi 14 (267321): 1–24. doi:10.11113/jt.v76.5852.
   Google Scholar
• Muqing, L. 2015. Urban Transport Project Prioritization Strategy in Developing Countries: A Scenario-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Perspective. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• NǍdǍban, S., S. Dzitac, and I. Dzitac. 2016. “Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View.” Procedia Computer Science 91 (Itqm): 823–831. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088.
   Google Scholar
• Naderpajouh, N., and M. Hastak. 2014. “Quantitative Analysis of Policies for Governance of Emergent Dynamics in Complex Construction Projects.” Construction Management and Economics 32 (12): 1222–1237. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.980835.
   Google Scholar
• Naqvi, A. H. 2017. CPEC: Hiccups in Expansion of Karakoram Highway. http://regionalrapport.com/cpec-hiccups-expansion-karakoram-highway/.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Authority (NHA). 2014. PC-1 Islamabad-Raikot Section, China-Pak Economic Corridor (CPEC).
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Authority (NHA). 2019. “National Highway Network of Pakistan.” http://nha.gov.pk/en/maps/.
   Google Scholar
• Neste, J., and T. Karjalainen. 2013. The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment. IMPERIA Report EU LIFE11 ENB-FI-905. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/49480.
   Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S. 1998. “Multicriteria Optimization in Civil Engineering (in Serbian).” PhD Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade.
   Google Scholar
• Pakpips. 2018. “Pakistan Security Report 2017.” https://www.pakpips.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/sr2017-overview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, N. F. 2008. “Fuzzy AHP Approach for Selecting the Suitable Bridge Construction Method.” Automation in Construction 17 (8): 958–965. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehlivan, N. Y., and T. Paksoy. 2017. “Comparison of Methods in FAHP with Application in Supplier Selection.” In Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, edited by Ali Emrouznejad and William Ho, 45-76. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S. D., and M. Ramachandran. 2004. “Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Sustainable Energy Planning: A Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8: 365–381. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplawska, J., A. Labib, D. M. Reed, and A. Ishizaka. 2015. “Stakeholder Profile Definition and Salience Measurement with Fuzzy Logic and Visual Analytics Applied to Corporate Social Responsibility Case Study.” Journal of Cleaner Production 105: 103–115. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H., and W. Zonneveld. 2003. “What Are Corridors and What Are the Issues? Introduction to Special Issue: The Governance of Corridors.” Journal of Transport Geography 11 (3): 167–177. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(03)00028-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ramani, T. L., J. Zietsman, W. E. Knowles, and L. Quadrifoglio. 2011. “Sustainability Enhancement Tool for State Departments of Transportation Using Performance Measurement.” Journal of Transportation Engineering 137 (6): 404–415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, S. I. 2017. “NHA Facing Over 3,000 Court Cases Involving Billions of Rupees.” DAWN, December 18. https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=18_12_2017_005_008.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. 2014. A Geodesign Inspired Multiple Criteria Decision Tool for Prioritizing Levee Setback Project Sites. Washington, DC: University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, T. J. 2010. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119994374.
   Google Scholar
• Roudini, M. 2015. Application of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in Selecting Proper Contractors: Case of Sistan and Baluchistan Province Gas Company. Famagusta: Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, P. A., D. P. Ruiz, A. J. Torija, and Á. Ramos-Ridao. 2016. “Selection of Suitable Alternatives to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Road Traffic Noise Using a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 61: 8–18. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, R.W. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning.” In Priority Setting. Resource Allocation. New York: MacGraw-Hill. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6.
   Google Scholar
• Sadasivuni, R., N. Rodrigo, and J. Dumas. 2009. “A Transportation Corridor Case Study for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.” Paper presented at the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference. Baltimore, Maryland, March 9-13. http://www.cavs.msstate.edu/publications/docs/2009/03/5937OHara_ASPRS2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, R., Y., Kleiner, and B. Rajani. 2004. “Aggregative Risk Analysis for Water Quality Failure in Distribution Networks.” Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology – AQUA 53 (4): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarul, L. S., and Ö. Eren. 2016. “The Comparison of MCDM Methods Including AHP, TOPSIS and MAUT with an Application on Gender Inequality Index.” European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 4 (April): 181–194. doi:10.26417/ejis.v4i2.p183-196.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M. P., and P. Singh. 2017. “Multi-Criteria GIS Modeling for Optimum Route Alignment Planning in Outer Region of Allahabad City, India.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences 10 (13): 294. doi:10.1007/s12517-017-3076-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi, B., and T.V. Prabhakar. 2012. “A Simplified Description of Fuzzy TOPSIS.” Arxiv:1205.5098v1 [Cs.AI]. Cornell University, New York. http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5098.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, T., M. Azambuja, J. T. O’Connor, and W. J. O’Brien. 2014. “Empirical Study on the Key Drivers Affecting Durations for Right-of-Way Acquisition on Highway Projects.” Journal of Management in Engineering 30 (3): 04014009. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani, A., K. Hewage, B. Reza, and R. Sadiq. 2015. “Multiple Stakeholders in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in the Context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Review.” Waste Management. 35: 318–328. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, T., and D. Pari. 2015. “Highway Alignment Using Geographical Information System.” IOSR Journal of Engineering 05 (05): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Supçiller, A., and O. Çapraz. 2011. “Ahp-Topsis Yöntemine Dayali Tedarikçi Seçimi Uygulamasi.” Ekonometri ve İstatistik E-Dergisi 13: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Taylan, O., A. O. Bafail, R. M.S. Abdulaal, and M. R. Kabli. 2014. “Construction Projects Selection and Risk Assessment by Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodologies.” Applied Soft Computing Journal 17: 105–116. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E. 2013. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (Chapter 1).” In Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, vol. 44, 1–9. Switzerland: Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6_2.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G.-H., and J.-J. Huang. 2011. Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Methods and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2..
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, D. J. 1994. “Redefining Public Involvement.” Journal of Management in Engineering 10 (4): 13–15. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:4(13).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• URS. 2012. Route Selection Manual. Ethiopian Road Authority. London: URS Infrastructure and Environment UK Limited. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08a8a40f0b652dd0007a4/route-selection-manual-for-Ethiopia-Draft-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez, M., and P. T. Hester. 2013. “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods.” International Journal of Operations Research 10 (2): 56–66. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2.
   Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., M. Prasanna, and N. H. Prakash. 2014. “Integrated Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS for Selecting the Best Plastic Recycling Method: A Case Study.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 38 (19–20): 4662–4672. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2002. Project Risk Management Theory, Methods and Application. Beijing China: China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wideman, R. M. 2004. How to Motivate All Stakeholders to Work Together: Field Guide to Management. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• World Highways. 2010. “Learning from Russia’s Controversial Road Project.” World Highways. http://www.worldhighways.com/categories/traffic-focus-highway-management/features/learning-from-russias-controversial-road-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., G. Flintsch, A. Ferreira, and L. de Picado-Santos. 2012. “Framework for Multiobjective Optimization of Physical Highway Assets Investments.” Journal of Transportation Engineering 138 (12): 1411–1421. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakar, F., and F. Celik. 2014. “A Highway Alignment Determination Model Incorporating GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Making.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18 (6): 1847–1857. doi:10.1007/s12205-014-0130-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8: 338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar, I., I. Y. Wuni, G. Q. P. Shen, S. Ahmed, and T. Yousaf. 2019. “A Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Analysis of Time Overrun Risk Factors in Highway Projects of Terrorism-Affected Countries: The Case of Pakistan.” International Journal of Construction Management 0 (0): 1–19. doi:10.1080/15623599.2019.1647634.
   Google Scholar
• Zafar, I., T. Yousaf, and S. Ahmed. 2016. “Evaluation of Risk Factors Causing Cost Overrun in Road Projects in Terrorism Affected Areas Pakistan: A Case Study.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 2016: 1613–1620. doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0348-6.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., and Z. Turskis. 2011. “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17: 397–427. doi:10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., X. Y. Cui, and J. T. Wang. 2012. “Research on Highway Alignment Decision-Making Based on Complex System Risk Analysis.” In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering - Annual Conference Proceedings, 1838–1846. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICMSE.2012.6414422.
   Google Scholar
• Zolfani, S. H., and J. Antucheviciene. 2012. “Team Member Selecting Based on AHP and TOPSIS Grey.” Engineering Economics 23(4): 425–434. doi:10.5755/j01.ee.23.4.2725.
   Google Scholar