A new hybrid modified MADM model for the potential evaluation of a comprehensive land consolidation project (LCP) toward achieving sustainable development

References

• Abubakari, Z., P. van der Molen, R. M. Bennett, and E. D. Kuusaana. 2016. “Land Consolidation, Customary Lands, and Ghana’s Northern Savannah Ecological Zone: An Evaluation of the Possibilities and Pitfalls.” Land Use Policy 54: 386–398. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cay, T., and F. Iscan. 2011. “Fuzzy Expert System for Land Reallocation in Land Consolidation.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (9): 11055–11071. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cay, T., and M. Uyan. 2013. “Evaluation of Reallocation Criteria in Land Consolidation Studies Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).” Land Use Policy 30 (1): 541–548. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, V. Y.-C., J. C.-L. Lin, and G.-H. Tzeng. 2019. “Assessment and Improvement of Wetlands Environmental Protection Plans for Achieving Sustainable Development.” Environmental Research 169: 280–296. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, J. C., P. A. Pinto, and L. Mira da Silva. 2001. “A Systems Approach for the Estimation of the Effects of Land Consolidation Projects (LCPs): A Model and Its Application.” Agricultural Systems 68: 179–195. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00061-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, S., and P. Manuel. 2019. “A Practical Method for the Ex-Ante Evaluation of Land Consolidation Initiatives: Fully Connected Parcels with the Same Value.” Land Use Policy 81: 463–471. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crecente, R., C. Alvarez, and U. Fra. 2002. “Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Land Consolidation in Galicia.” Land Use Policy 19 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00006-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D. 2013. The Development of an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation. Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02347-2
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D. 2016. “The Assessment of Land Valuation in Land Consolidation Schemes: The Need for a New Land Valuation Framework”. Land Use Policy 54: 487–498. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., J. Stillwell, and L. See. 2012. “Land Consolidation in Cyprus: Why Is an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System Required?” Land Use Policy 29 (1): 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, D., S. Wen, F. H. Chen, and S. L. Lin. 2018. “A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model of Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese Certified Public Accountant Firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 180: 603–616. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettanen, S., and A. Vitikainen. 2016. “Land Consolidation and the Value of Rural Cultural Landscape.” Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 11 (1): 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hiironen, J., and K. Riekkinen. 2016. “Agricultural Impacts and Profitability of Land Consolidations.” Land Use Policy 55: 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. C. 2015. “Tai　Wan　tu　di　Chong　Hua　yu　Nong　Cun　fa　Zhan　(臺灣土地重劃與農村發展).” China Land（中國土地） 6: 13–14 (in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. C., and J. H. Bai. 2011. “Nong　Cun　She　qu　tu　di　Chong　Hua　Tiao　li　Zhi　Xiu　fa　Gou　Xiang　Chu　yi　(農村社區土地重劃條例之修法構想芻議).” landagent（現代地政） 340: 105–114. in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, W. C., M. H. Tsai, and G. H. Tzeng. 2018. “Exploring the Best Strategy Plan for Improving the Digital Convergence by Using a Hybrid MADM Model.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 24 (1): 164–198. doi:10.3846/20294913.2016.1205531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, K. H., F. H. Chen, and G. H. Tzeng. 2016. “Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM.” Sustainability 8 (7): 606. doi:10.3390/su8070606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S. K., J. H. Liou, M. T. Li, Y. C. Chuang, and G. H. Tzeng. 2018. “Improving NFC Technology Promotion for Creating the Sustainable Education Environment by Using a Hybrid Modified MADM Model.” Sustainability 10 (5): 1379. doi:10.3390/su10051379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K. W., J. H. Huang, and G. H. Tzeng. 2016. “New Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Model for Improving Competence Sets: Enhancing a Company’s Core Competitiveness.” Sustainability 8 (2): 175. doi:10.3390/su8020175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus, J., and J. Taszakowski. 2018. “Spatial Differentiation of Indicators Presenting Selected Barriers in the Productivity of Agricultural Areas: A Regional Approach to Setting Land Consolidation Priorities.” Ecological Indicators 93: 718–729. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus, J., and I. Markuszewska. 2019. “Forty Years Later: Assessment of the Long-Lasting Effectiveness of Land Consolidation Projects.” Land Use Policy 83: 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X. B., X. X. Xu, X. M. Xiang, Q. Bai, and Y. K. Zhou. 2016. “System-Dynamic Analysis on Socio-Economic Impacts of Land Consolidation in China.” Habitat International 56: 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, P. H., P. Heike, R. Ejrnaes, J. V. Olsen, S. Praestholm, and J. S. Schou. 2018. “Pursuing Collective Impact: A Novel Indicator-Based Approach to Assessment of Shared Measurements When Planning for Multifunctional Land Consolidation.” Land Use Policy 73: 102–114. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juang, H. W., and C. H. Lai. 2011. “Nong Cun　Zai　Sheng　Tiao　li　de　Yong　xu　fa　Zhan　Xiang　du　Yan　Jiu　(農村再生條例的永續發展向度研究)”. Agricultural Extension Anthology 56: 61–76. in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Jürgenson, E. 2016. “Land Reform, Land Fragmentation and Perspectives for Future Land Consolidation in Estonia.” Land Use Policy 57: 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land Consolidation Engineering Bureau, Ministry of the Interior. 2017. “Agricultural Land Consolidation.” http://www.lceb.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. L., Y. H. Shih, G. H. Tzeng, and H. C. Yu. 2016. “A Service Selection Model for Digital Music Service Platforms Using a Hybrid MCDM Approach.” Applied Soft Computing 48: 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.05.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. 2010. “A Comparative Study Between the Rural Regeneration Act (Draft) and the Rural Re-Building Act (Draft).” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Liou, J. H., J. Tamošaitienė, E. K. Zavadskas, and G. H. Tzeng. 2016. “New Hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for Improving and Selecting Suppliers in Green Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Production Research 54 (1): 114–134. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1010747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisec, A., T. Primožič, M. Ferlan, R. Šumrada, and S. Drobne. 2014. “Land Owners’ Perception of Land Consolidation and Their Satisfaction with the Results: Slovenian Experiences.” Land Use Policy 38: 550–563. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K. M., S. H. Lin, J. C. Hsieh, and G. H. Tzeng. 2018. “Improving the Food Waste Composting Facilities Site Selection for Sustainable Development Using a Hybrid Modified MADM Model.” Waste Management 75: 44–59. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., H. Wang, and G.-H. Tzeng. 2018. “From Measure to Guidance: Galactic Model and Sustainable Development Planning Toward the Best Smart City.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 144 (4): 04018035. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, I. Y., T. Kuo, T. S. Lin, G. H. Tzeng, and S. L. Huang. 2016. “Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Develop Effective Sustainable Development Strategies for Enhancing Competitive Advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan.” Sustainability 8 (7): 646. doi:10.3390/su8070646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, D., R. Crecente, and M. F. Alvarez. 2006. “Land Consolidation in Inland Rural Galicia, N.W. Spain, Since 1950: An Example of the Formulation and Use of Questions, Criteria and Indicators for Evaluation of Rural Development Policies.” Land Use Policy 23 (4): 511–520. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchová, Z., and F. Petrovič. 2019. “Prioritization and Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects: Žitava River Basin in a Slovakian Case.” Sustainability 11 (7): 2041. doi:10.3390/su11072041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchová, Z., M. Leitmanová, and F. Petrovič. 2016. “Possibilities of Optimal Land Use as a Consequence of Lessons Learned from Land Consolidation Projects (Slovakia).” Ecological Engineering 90: 294–306. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizam Kamaruzzaman, S., E. C. W. Lou, P. F. Wong, R. Wood, and A. I. Che-Ani. 2018. “Developing Weighting System for Refurbishment Building Assessment Scheme in Malaysia Through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach.” Energy Policy 112: 280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., and G. H. Tzeng. 2004. “Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.” European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2): 445–455. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S., and G. H. Tzeng. 2007. “Extended VIKOR Method in Comparison with Outranking Methods.” European Journal of Operational Research 178 (2): 514–529. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Yang, Y. P., H. M. Shieh, J. D. Leu, and G. H. Tzeng. 2008. “A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications.” International Journal of Operational Research 5 (3): 160–168. https://www.orstw.org.tw/ijor/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Pašakarnis, G., D. Morley, and V. Maliene. 2013. “Rural Development and Challenges Establishing Sustainable Land Use in Eastern European Countries.” Land Use Policy 30 (1): 703–710. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pašakarnis, G., and V. Maliene. 2010. “Towards Sustainable Rural Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying Land Consolidation.” Land Use Policy 27 (2): 545–549. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, K. U., and G. H. Tzeng. 2019. “Exploring Heritage Tourism Performance Improvement for Making Sustainable Development Strategies Using the Hybrid-Modified MADM Model.” Current Issues in Tourism 22 (8): 921–947. doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1306030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1996. Decision Making in Complex Environments, the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decision Making with Dependence and Dependence and Feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sayılan, H. 2014. “Importance of Land Consolidation in the Sustainable Use of Turkey's Rural Land Resources.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 120 (19): 248–256. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.102.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., X. Cao, D. Fu, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Comprehensive Value Discovery of Land Consolidation Projects: An Empirical Analysis of Shanghai, China.” Sustainability 10 (6): 2039. doi:10.3390/su10062039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklenicka, P. 2006. “Applying Evaluation Criteria for the Land Consolidation Effect to Three Contrasting Study Areas in the Czech Republic.” Land Use Policy 23 (4): 502–510. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomić, H., S. Mastelić Ivić, and M. Roić. 2018. “Land Consolidation Suitability Ranking of Cadastral Municipalities: Information-Based Decision-Making Using Multi-Criteria Analyses of Official Registers’ Data.” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (3): 87. doi:10.3390/ijgi7030087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., and K. Y. Shen. 2017. New Concepts and Trends of Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uyan, M., T. Cay, Y. Inceyol, and H. Hakli. 2015. “Comparison of Designed Different Land Reallocation Models in Land Consolidation: A Case Study in Konya/Turkey.” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 110: 249–258. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2014.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Huylenbroeck, G., and L. Martens. 1992. “The Average Value Ranking Multi-Criteria Method for Project Evaluation in Regional Planning.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 19 (2): 237–252. doi:10.1093/erae/19.2.237.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huylenbroeck, G., J. Coelho, and P. A. Pinto. 1996. “Evaluation of Land Consolidation Projects (LCPs): A Multidisciplinary Approach.” Journal of Rural Studies 12 (3): 297–310. doi:10.1016/0743-0167(96)00024-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., X. Wang, Z. Zhang, and X. Zhao. 2018. “Assessing the Potential of Rural Settlement Land Consolidation in China: A Method Based on Comprehensive Evaluation of Restricted Factors.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3102. doi:10.3390/su10093102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. F., W. Zhao, and X. K. Gu. 2014. “Changes Resulting from a Land Consolidation Project (LCP) and Its Resource–Environment Effects: A Case Study in Tianmen City of Hubei Province, China.” Land Use Policy 54: 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.013.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. H., X. X. Qin, L. Liu, and Y. M. Hu. 2017. “A Potential Evaluation Model for Land Consolidation in Fragmental Regions.” Ecological Indicators 74: 230–240. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, B. W., J. R. Zhang, G. H. Tzeng, S. L. Huang, and L. Xiong. 2017. “Public Open Space Development for Elderly People by Using the DANP-V Model to Establish Continuous Improvement Strategies Towards a Sustainable and Healthy Aging Society.” Sustainability 9 (3): 420. doi:10.3390/su9030420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar