409
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Understanding the problems of biogas production deployment in different regions: territorial governance matters too

, &
Pages 1655-1673 | Received 15 Feb 2019, Accepted 08 Oct 2019, Published online: 15 Nov 2019

References

  • Aitken, M. 2010. “Why We Still Don’t Understand the Social Aspects of Wind Power: A Critique of Key Assumptions Within the Literature.” Energy Policy 38 (4): 1834–1841. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060.
  • Batel, S., P. Devine-Wright, and T. Tangeland. 2013. “Social Acceptance of Low Carbon Energy and Associated Infrastructures: A Critical Discussion.” Energy Policy 58: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018.
  • Davidson, D. J., and Gross, M., eds. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Energy and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2005. “Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy.” Wind Energy 8 (2): 125–139. doi:10.1002/we.124.
  • Devine-Wright, P. 2013. “Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line: The Role of Personal, Place Attachment and Project-Related Factors.” Environment and Behavior 45 (6): 761–781. doi:10.1177/0013916512440435.
  • Devine-Wright, P., and H. Devine-Wright. 2006. “Social Representations of Intermittency and the Shaping of Public Support for Wind Energy in the UK.” International Journal of Global Energy Issues 25 (3–4): 243–256. doi:10.1504/IJGEI.2006.008994.
  • Edwards, J., M. Othman, and S. Burn. 2015. “A Review of Policy Drivers and Barriers for the Use of Anaerobic Digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52: 815–828. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.112.
  • Fournis, Y., and M. J. Fortin. 2017. “From Social ‘Acceptance’ to Social ‘Acceptability’ of Wind Energy Projects: Towards a Territorial Perspective.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1133406.
  • Gilly, J. P., and A. Torre. 2000. “Proximity Relations: Elements for an Analytical Framework.” In Industrial Networks and Proximity, edited by M. B. Green, 1–16. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Grabher, G., A. Melchior, B. Schiemer, E. Schüßler, and J. Sydow. 2018. “From Being There to Being Aware: Confronting Geographical and Sociological Imaginations of Copresence.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (1): 245–255. doi:10.1177/0308518X17743507.
  • Greenberg, M. R. 2014. “Energy Policy and Research: The Underappreciation of Trust.” Energy Research and Social Science 1: 152–160. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004.
  • Gross, C. 2007. “Community Perspectives of Wind Energy in Australia: The Application of a Justice and Community Fairness Framework to Increase Social Acceptance.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2727–2736. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
  • Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (vol. 25). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hirschman, A. O. 1986. “Exit and Voice: An Expanding Sphere of Influence.” In Rival Views of Market Society, edited by A. O. Hirschman, 77–101. New York: Viking.
  • Holtz, S. 2013. “Redirecting Anti-Wind Energy.” Alternatives Journal 39 (5): 44.
  • Kortsch, T., J. Hildebrand, and P. Schweizer-Ries. 2015. “Acceptance of Biomass Plants: Results of a Longitudinal Study in the Bioenergy-Region Altmark.” Renewable Energy 83: 690–697. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.04.059.
  • Mander, S. 2008. “The Role of Discourse Coalitions in Planning for Renewable Energy: A Case Study of Wind-Energy Deployment.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26 (3): 583–600. doi:10.1068/c0503j.
  • Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schumacher, K., and F. Schultmann. 2017. “Local Acceptance of Biogas Plants: A Comparative Study in the Trinational Upper Rhine Region.” Waste and Biomass Valorization 8 (7): 2393–2412. doi:10.1007/s12649-016-9802-z.
  • Soland, M., N. Steimer, and G. Walter. 2013. “Local Acceptance of Existing Biogas Plants in Switzerland.” Energy Policy 61: 802–810. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.111.
  • Torre, A. 2014. “Proximity Relations at the Heart of Territorial Development Processes: From Clusters, Spatial Conflicts and Temporary Geographical Proximity to Territorial Governance.” In Regional Development and Proximity Relations, edited by A. Torre and F. Wallet, 94–134. Cheltenham: Elgar Edward.
  • Torre, A., R. Melot, H. Magsi, L. Bossuet, A. Cadoret, A. Caron, S. Darly, P. Jeanneaux, T. Kirat, H. V. Pham., et al. 2014. “Identifying and Measuring Land-Use and Proximity Conflicts: Methods and Identification.” SpringerPlus 3 (1): 85. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-85.
  • Torre, A., and A. Rallet. 2005. “Proximity and Localization.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 47–59. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320842.
  • Torre, A., and F. Wallet. 2014. The Role of Proximity Relations in Regional and Territorial Development Processes. ERSA Conference Papers (No. ersa14p719). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: European Regional Science Association.
  • Torre, A., and B. Zuindeau. 2009. “Proximity Economics and Environment: Assessment and Prospects.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/09640560802504613.
  • Wolsink, M. 2006. “Invalid Theory Impedes Our Understanding: A Critique on the Persistence of the Language of NIMBY.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS31: 85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x.
  • Wolsink, M. 2007. “Planning of Renewables Schemes: Deliberative and Fair Decision-Making on Landscape Issues instead of Reproachful Accusations of Non-Cooperation.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2692–2704. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002.
  • Wolsink, M. 2010. “Contested Environmental Policy Infrastructure: Socio-Political Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Water, and Waste Facilities.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30 (5): 302–311. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.001.
  • Zemo, K. H., T. E. Panduro, and M. Termansen. 2019. “Impact of Biogas Plants on Rural Residential Property Values and Implications for Local Acceptance.” Energy Policy 129: 1121–1131. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.008.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.