Multi-criteria analysis process for creation and evaluation of PES alternatives in the Ruka-Kuusamo tourism area

References

• Arriagada, R. A., P. J. Ferraro, E. O. Sills, S. K. Pattanayak, and S. Cordero-Sancho. 2012. “Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica.” Land Economics 88 (2): 382–399. doi:10.3368/le.88.2.382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, W., and F. H. Barron. 1994. “SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 (3): 306–325. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. “Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of Issues.” Ecological Economics 65 (4): 663–674. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facts about Ruka and Kuusamo. 2017. “Facts about Ruka and Kuusamo.” Accessed November 10, 2019. http://www.ruka.fi/en/facts
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. 2014. Sustainable Growth from Bioeconomy: The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. Ministry of Employment and the Economy. Helsinki: Edita Publishing Ltd. Accessed January 10, 2018. http://biotalous.fi/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy_110620141.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FORMAS. 2012. Swedish Research and Innovation Strategy for a Biobased Economy. Accessed November 28, 2018. http://www.formas.se/PageFiles/5074/Strategy_Biobased_Ekonomy_hela.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, P., and L. Tyrväinen. 2010. “Introduction: Frontiers in Nature-Based Tourism.” Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 10: 177–189. doi:10.1080/15022250.2010.502365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto, P., D. Pettenella, and L. Secco. 2009. “Payments for Forest Environmental Services: Organisational Models and Related Experiences in Italy.” iForest: Biogeosciences and Forestry 2 (4): 133. doi:10.3832/ifor0504-002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieg-Gran, M., I. Porras, and S. Wunder. 2005. “How Can Market Mechanisms for Forest Environmental Services Help the Poor? Preliminary Lessons from Latin America.” World Development 33 (9): 1511–1527. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grima, N., S. Singh, and B. Smetschka. 2018. “Improving Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) Outcomes Through the Use of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and the Software OPTamos.” Ecosystem Services 29: 47–55. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grima, N., S. J. Singh, B. Smetschka, and L. Ringhofer. 2016. “Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the Performance of 40 Case Studies.” Ecosystem Services 17: 24–32. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänninen, H., J. Leppänen, V. Ovaskainen, J. Uusivuori, and E. J. Viitala. 2017. “Metsätalouden uusi kannustinjärjestelmä: teoriaa, käytäntöjä ja ehdotukset [New Incentive System for Forestry: Theory, Practice and Suggestions, in Finnish]. Luonnonvara-ja biotalouden tutkimus 5/2017. Accessed November 27, 2018. https://jukuri.luke.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/538067/luke-luobio_5_2017.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, P. 2006. “Forest Owners' Acceptance of Incentive Based Policy Instruments in Forest Biodiversity Conservation: A Choice Experiment Based Approach.” Silva Fennica 40 (1): 169–178. doi:10.14214/sf.359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, A., M. Kurttila, T. Hujala, K. Eyvindson, and J. Kangas. 2015. Decision Support for Forest Management. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kolinjivadi, V., J. Adamowski, and N. Kosoy. 2014. “Recasting Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Water Resource Management: A Novel Institutional Approach.” Ecosystem Services 10: 144–154. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, D. D., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C. J. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (S1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langemeyer, J., I. Palomo, S. Baraibar, and E. Gómez-Baggethun. 2018. “Participatory Multicriteria Decision Aid: Operationalizing an Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Services.” Ecosystem Services 30: 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, M., Y. Liu, H. Hartmann, S. Stewart, T. Wagener, D. Semmens, R. Stewart, et al. 2009. “A Formal Framework for Scenario Development in Support of Environmental Decision-Making.” Environmental Modelling and Software 24 (7): 798–808. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa, E., A. Juutinen, L. Tyrväinen, J. Karhu, and M. Kurttila. 2018a. “Participation and Compensation Claims in Voluntary Forest Landscape Conservation: The Case of the Ruka-Kuusamo Tourism Area, Finland.” Journal of Forest Economics 33: 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa, E., A. Juutinen, L. Tyrväinen, and M. Kurttila. Forthcoming. “Importance of Landscape Quality for Companies Operating in Nature Tourism Areas.” Land Use Policy 104095. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntymaa, E., V. Ovaskainen, A. Juutinen, and L. Tyrväinen. 2018b. “Integrating Nature-Based Tourism and Forestry in Private Lands under Heterogeneous Visitor Preferences for Forest Attributes.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 61 (4): 724–746. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1333408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, L. 2017. “Commercialization of Nature Through Tourism.” Doctoral diss., Mid Sweden University. Accessed November 30, 2018. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1147748&dswid=-3104.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, L. 2016. “Nature as a Commercial Setting: The Case of Nature-Based Tourism Providers in Sweden.” Current Issues in Tourism 21: 1–19. doi:10.1080/13683500.2016.1232378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElwee, P. D. 2012. “Payments for Environmental Services as Neoliberal Market-Based Forest Conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or Problem?” Geoforum 43 (3): 412–426. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.bioquest.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/files/2009/06/ecosystems-and-health.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Øian, H., P. Fredman, K. Sandell, A.-D. Saeþórsdóttir, L. Tyrväinen, and F. S. Jensen. 2018. Tourism, Nature and Sustainability: A Review of Policy Instruments in the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Pagiola, S. 2008. “Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics 65 (4): 712–724. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirard, R., G. de Buren, and R. Lapeyre. 2014. “Do PES Improve the Governance of Forest Restoration?” Forests 5 (3): 404–424. doi:10.3390/f5030404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, C. A., and S. A. Wolf. 2014. “Payments for Ecosystem Services in Relation to US and UK Agri-Environmental Policy: Disruptive Neoliberal Innovation or Hybrid Policy Adaptation?” Agriculture and Human Values 31 (3): 397–408. doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9518-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primmer, E. 2011. “Analysis of Institutional Adaptation: Integration of Biodiversity Conservation into Forestry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 19 (16): 1822–1832. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roadmap for Tourism. 2015. Achieving More Together: Roadmap for Growth and Renewal in Finnish Tourism 2015 – 2025. (In Finnish with English summary.) Ministry of Employment and the Economy Reports 4/2015. Accessed January 22, 2018. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-227-938-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sattler, C., and B. Matzdorf. 2013. “PES in a Nutshell: From Definitions and Origins to PES in Practice: Approaches, Design Process and Innovative Aspects.” Ecosystem Services 6: 2–11. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, L. P., Kieninger, L. Gerner, M. Kapfer, and J. Kantelhart. 2017. D5.1: Report on Governance Mechanisms Selection, Methodology Adaptation and Guidelines for Evaluation. Deliverable from PROVIDE Project. Accessed November 10, 2018. http://www.provide-project.eu/documents/2017/03/d5-1_report-on-governance-mechanisms-selection-methodology-adaptation-and-guidelines-for-evaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra, R., and E. Russman. 2006. “On the Efficiency of Environmental Service Payments: A Forest Conservation Assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics 59 (1): 131–141. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., P. Rowcroft, M. Everard, L. Couldrick, M. Reed, H. Rogers, T. Quick, C. Eves, and C. White. 2013. Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Best Practice Guide. London: Department for Environment. Food and Rural Affairs. Accessed October 4, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/payments-for-ecosystem-services-pes-best-practice-guide.
   Google Scholar
• Sorice, M. G., and C. J. Donlan. 2015. “A Human-Centered Framework for Innovation in Conservation Incentive Programs.” Ambio 44 (8): 788–792. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0650-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, J. H. 2011. “Sustainability Science: A Review, an Analysis and Some Empirical Lessons.” Environmental Conservation 38 (3): 275–287. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, T., E. G. Nichols, A. James, L. Bradford, L. Ebersöhn, V. Scherman, F. Omidire, D. N. Bunn, W. Twine, and M. R. McHale. 2015. “Practising the Science of Sustainability: The Challenges of Transdisciplinary in a Developing World Context.” Sustainability Science 10: 581–599. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0334-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustainable Innovation. 2013. Sustainable Innovation in Food and Bio-Based Industries–BIONAER, Work programme 2012–2021. The Research Council of Norway. Accessed January 22, 2018. https://www.forskningsradet.no/prognett-bionaer/Programme_description/1253971968649.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. S., and D. A. Friess. 2019. “Stakeholder Preferences for Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) Versus Other Environmental Management Approaches for Mangrove Forests.” Journal of Environmental Management 233: 636–648. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thu, T. P., M. Moeliono, G. Y. Wong, and M. Brockhaus. 2018. “The Politics of Swidden: A Case Study from Nghe An and Son La in Vietnam.” Land Use Policy doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikkanen, J., R. Hokajärvi, T. Hujala, and M. Kurttila. 2017. “Ex Ante Evaluation of a PES System: Safeguarding Recreational Environments for Nature-Based Tourism.” Journal of Rural Studies 52: 42–55. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, P. X., W. H. Dressler, S. Mahanty, T. T. Pham, and C. Zingerli. 2012. “The Prospects for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Vietnam: A Look at Three Payment Schemes.” Human Ecology 40 (2): 237–249. doi:10.1007/s10745-012-9480-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traedal, L. T., P. O. Vedeld, and J. G. Pétursson. 2016. “Analyzing the Transformations of Forest PES in Vietnam: Implications for REDD+.” Forest Policy and Economics 62: 109–117. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen, L., E. Mäntymaa, and V. Ovaskainen. 2014. “Demand for Enhanced Forest Amenities in Private Lands: The Case of Ruka-Kuusamo Tourism Area, Finland.” Forest Policy and Economics 47: 4–13. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen, L., H. Silvennoinen, and V. Hallikainen. 2017. “Effect of the Season and Forest Management on the Quality of the Tourism Environment: Case from Finnish Lapland.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 32 (4): 349–359. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02827581.2016.1241892. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1241892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacik, H., M. Kurttila, T. Hujala, C. Khadka, A. Haara, J. Pykäläinen, P. Honkakoski, B. Wolfslehner, and J. Tikkanen. 2014. “Evaluating Collaborative Planning Methods Supporting Programme-Based Planning in Natural Resource Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 144: 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kerkoff, L. 2014. “Developing Integrative Research for Sustainability Science Through a Complexity Principles-Based Approach.” Sustainability Science 9: 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar