Impact of upstream plant level pollution on downstream water quality: evidence from the clean water act

References

• Bandyopadhyay, S., and J. K. Horowitz. 2006. “Do Plants Overcomply with Water Pollution Regulations? The Role of Discharge Variability.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 6 (1): 4. doi:10.2202/1538-0653.1486.
   Google Scholar
• Bodo, B. A. 1992. “Statistical Analyses of Regional Surface Water Quality in Southeastern Ontario.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 23 (1-3): 165–187. doi:10.1007/BF00406960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Shaarawi, A. H., S. R. Esterby, and K. W. Kuntz. 1983. “A Statistical Evaluation of Trends on the Water Quality of the Niagara River.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 9 (2): 234–240. doi:10.1016/S0380-1330(83)71892-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterby, S. R. 1996. “Review of Methods for the Detection and Estimation of Trends with Emphasis on Water Quality Applications.” Hydrological Processes 10 (2): 127–149. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199602)10:2<127::AID-HYP354>3.0.CO;2-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAO (General Accounting Office). 2000. Water Quality: Key EPA and State Decisions Limited by Inconsistent and Incomplete Data. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office. GAO/RCED-00-54
   Google Scholar
• Gilliom, R.J., and D. R. Helsel. 1986. “Estimation of Distributional Parameters for Censored Trace Level Water Quality Data: 1. Estimation Techniques.” Water Resources Research 22 (2): 135–146. doi:10.1029/WR022i002p00135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L. E., and C. Langpap. 2019. “Private Provision of Public Goods by Environmental Groups.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (12): 5334–5340. doi:10.1073/pnas.1805336115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, W. B., and R. J. Shadbegian. 2004. “‘Optimal’ Pollution Abatement: Whose Benefits Matter, and How Much?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (3): 510–534. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2003.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, R. M., and J. R. Slack. 1984. “A Nonparametric Trend Test for Seasonal Data with Serial Dependence.” Water Resources Research 20 (6): 727–732. doi:10.1029/WR020i006p00727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, D.A., C. L. Kling, and J. S. Shapiro. 2019. “The Low but Uncertain Measured Benefits of US Water Quality Policy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA PNAS 116 (12) 5262–5269. doi:10.1073/pnas.1802870115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser, D.A., and J. S. Shapiro. 2019. “Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134 (1): 349–396. doi:10.1093/qje/qjy019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, V. D., and G.E. Schwarz. 1992. “The Supply and Demand for Pollution Control: Evidence from Wastewater Treatment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23 (1): 54–77. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(92)90041-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmstaed, S.M. 2010. “The Economics of Water Quality.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4 (1): 44–62. doi:10.1093/reep/rep016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman, H. 2002. “International Spillovers and Water Quality in Rivers: Do Countries Free Ride?” The American Economic Review 92 (4): 1152–1159. doi:10.1257/00028280260344687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigman, H. 2004. “Does Trade Promote Environmental Coordination?: Pollution in International Rivers.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (2): 2. doi:10.2202/1538-0645.1251.
   Google Scholar
• Sigman, H. 2005. “Transboundary Spillovers and Decentralization of Environmental Policies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50 (1): 82–101. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. K., and C.V. Wolloh. 2012. Act? “NBER Working Paper 2012. Has Surface Water Quality Improved Since the Clean Water No. 18192, June 2012.” www.nber.org/papers/w18192.
   Google Scholar
• Streeter, H.W., and E.B. Phelps. 1925. A Study of the Pollution and Natural Purification of the Ohio River. Public Health Bulletin 146, Washington, DC: US Public Health Service.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1991. Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Control. EPA505-290-001. EPA 505-290-001. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office for Water.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2000a. A Benefits Assessment of Water Pollution Control Programs since 1972: Part 1, the Benefits of Point Source Controls for Conventional Pollutants in Rivers and Streams. Final Report. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2000b. A Retrospective Assessment of the Costs of the Clean Water Act: 1972 to 1997: Final Report. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2005. “USGS Surface and Water Quality Models Information Clearinghouse.” Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey. http://smig.usgs.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Vellidis, G., P. Barnes, D.D. Bosch, and A.M. Cathey. 2006. “Mathematical Simulation Tools for Developing Dissolved Oxygen TMDLs.” Transactions of the ASABE 49 (4): 1003–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar