EIA decision-making and administrative justice: an empirical analysis

References

• Adler M. 2010. “Understanding and Analysing Administrative Justice.” In Administrative Justice in Context, edited by M. Adler, 129–160. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, R.C. 2020. “An Application of Theory of Change to EIA System Evaluation.” Doctor of Philosophy.” PhD thesis. Potchefstroom, South Africa: Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, R.C., F.P. Retief, C. Roos, and D.P. Cilliers. 2021. “EIA in Developing Countries: A Practitioners Guide.”. In Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, edited by K. Hannah. London: Routledge. (Forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, RC., FP. Retief, C. Roos, DP. Cilliers, and M. Arakele. 2020. “Re-Thinking the Fundamentals of EIA through the Identification of Key Assumptions for Evaluation.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38 (3): 205–213. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1676069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andre, P., B. Enserink, D. Connor, and P. Croal. 2006. Public Participation International Best Practice Principles: Special Publication Series 4. Fargo: International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, J., H. Runhaar, T. B. Fischer, U. Jha-Thakur, F. van Laerhoven, P. Driessen, and V. Onyango. 2012. “The Effectiveness of EIA as an Instrument for Environmental Governance: A Comparison of The Netherlands and the UK.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 14 (4): 1250025. doi:10.1142/S1464333212500251.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D.C., and J.N. McLelland. 2003. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of British Columbia's Environmental Assessment Process for First Nations' Participation in Mining Development.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23 (5): 581–603. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00093-3.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. 1984. Administrative Law. Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Bertenthal, A. 2020. “Administrative Reasonableness: An Empirical Analysis.” Wisconsin Law Review 1: 85–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, A., J. Pope, A. Morrison-Saunders, F. Retief, and J. Gunn. 2014. “Impact Assessment: Eroding Benefits through Streamlining?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 45: 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, A., J. Pope, A. Morrison-Saunders, and F. Retief. 2016. “A Game Theory Perspective on Environmental Assessment: What Games Are Played and What Does This Tell us about Decision Making Rationality and Legitimacy?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 57: 187–194. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., J. Pope, F. Retief, A. Morrison-Saunders, M. Fundingsland, and M. Hauptfleisch. 2020. “Explaining the Political Nature of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): A Neo-Gramscian Perspective.” Journal of Clean Production 244: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., J. Pope, F. Retief, and A. Morrison-Saunders. 2018. “On Legitimacy in Impact Assessment: An Epistemologically-Based Conceptualisation.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 69: 16–23. vol doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., T. B. Fischer, and J. Fothergill. 2017. “Progressing Quality in Environmental Impact Assessment: The IEMA Quality Mark as an Example of Voluntary Accreditation.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 63: 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borriello, F. 2020. “Principle of Proportionality and the Principle of Reasonableness.” Review of European Administrative Law 13 (2): 155–174. doi:10.7590/187479820X15930701852292.
   Google Scholar
• Caddick, A. 2015. Critical Review of the Quality of Environmental Authorisations in South Africa. Potchefstroom, South Africa: Master of Environmental Management (MEM), Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, L.K. 1988. “Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA): Origins, Evolution and Future Directions.” Impact Assessment 6 (3/4): 75–83. doi:10.1080/07349165.1988.9725648.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, D.P., I. Van Staden, C. Roos, R.C. Alberts, and F.P. Retief. 2020. “The Perceived Benefits of EIA for Government: A Regulator Perspective.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38 (5): 358–367. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1734403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. 2009. Authorisation Manual for Assessing Environmental Authorisations. Pretoria: DEAT.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, M., and K.J. Baehler. 2020. ‘Hostages to Compliance’: Towards a Reasonableness Test for Administrative Burdens.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3 (4): 273–287. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa010.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B. 2002. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Transport and Land-Use Planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B., and F. Retief. 2020. “Does Strategic Environmental Assessment Lead to More Environmentally Sustainable Decisions? Reflections on Its Substantive Effectiveness.”, In Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment (Chapter 8), edited by T. B. Fischer and A. González. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B., and O. Nadeem. 2014. Environmental Impact Assessment Course Curriculum for Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Pakistan: IUCN. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/niap___eia_curriculum_for_hei.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hallat, T., F. Retief, and L. Sandham. 2015. “A Critical Evaluation of the Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to EIA in Areas with High Biodiversity Value: Experience from the Cape Floristic Region.” South Africa. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 17 (3): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. 2006. “Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values.” European Journal of International Law 17 (1): 187–214. doi:10.1093/ejil/chi158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S., and T. B. Fischer. 2020. “Objectives for, of and in Strategic Environmental Assessment: UK Practice as an Example.” In Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment (Chapter 3), edited by T. B. Fischer and A. González, Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hoexter, C. 2007. Administrative Law in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). 1998. International EIA Best Practice Principles. Fargo: International Association for Impact Assessment, IAIA.
   Google Scholar
• IAIA and IEA. 1999. Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute for Environmental Assessment UK. Accessed 2019 July 1. http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur, U., and T. B. Fischer. 2016. “25 Years of the UK EIA System: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 61: 19–26. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and T. B. Fischer. 2016. “EIA Follow-Up in the UK: A 2015 Update.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 18 (01): 1650006. doi:10.1142/S146433321650006X.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, M., F. Retief, and R. Alberts. 2018. “Integrated Environmental Impact Assessment and Management.” In Environmental Management in South Africa, edited by H. Strydom, N. King, and F. Retief, 1213–1275. Cape Town: Juta Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzé, L. J. 2004. “The Application of Just Administrative Action in the South African Environmental Governance Sphere: An Analysis of Some Contemporary Thoughts and Recent Jurisprudence.” Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsjoernaal 7 (2): 58–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzé, L.J., and A.J. Van Der Walt. 2003. “Just Administrative Action and the Issue of Unreasonable Delay in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process: A South African Perspective.” South African Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 42: 63–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D. 1997. “Quality and Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessments: Lessons and Insights from Ten Assessments in Canada.” Project Appraisal 12 (4): 219–232. vol doi:10.1080/02688867.1997.9727064.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, John J., and Mauricio Dziedzic. 2018. “Evaluating EIA Systems’ Effectiveness. A State of the Art.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 68: 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashaw, J. 1983. Bureaucratic Justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. and A. Huberman. 1994. An Expanded Source Book: Qualitative Data Analysis – Second Edition. London: Sage Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. K. 2012. “Environmental Impact Assessment: The State of the Art.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., L.E. Sanchez, F. Retief, J. Sinclair, M. Doelle, M. Jones, J. Wessels, and J. Pope. 2020. “Gearing up Impact Assessment as a Vehicle for Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38 (2): 113–117. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1677089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, R. 1924. “Growth of Administrative Justice.” Wisconsin Law Review 2 (6): 321–339.
   Google Scholar
• Retief, F. 2007a. “A Performance Evaluation of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Processes within the South African Context.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27 (1): 84–100. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief, F. 2007b. “A Quality and Effectiveness Review Protocol for Strategic Environmental Assessment in Developing Countries.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 9 (4): 443–471. vol pp doi:10.1142/S1464333207002895.
   Google Scholar
• Retief, F. 2010. “The Evolution of Environmental Assessment Debates – Critical Perspectives from South Africa.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 12 (4): 375–323. doi:10.1142/S146433321000370X.
   Google Scholar
• Retief, F., A. Morrison-Saunders, D. Geneletti, and J. Pope. 2013. “Exploring the Psychology of Trade-off Decision Making in EIA.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.768007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief, F., C. Steenkamp, and R. Alberts. 2020. “Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in South Africa: ‘A Road Not Taken.” In: Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment, edited by T. B. Fischer and A. González, Chapter 22. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Retief, F., C. Welman, and L. A. Sandham. 2011. “Performance of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis between the 1997 and 2006 EIA Regimes.” South African Geographical Journal 93 (2): 154–118. doi:10.1080/03736245.2011.592263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief, F., T.B. Fischer, R.C. Alberts, C. Roos, and D. P. Cilliers. 2020. “An Administrative Justice Perspective on Improving EIA Effectiveness.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38 (2): 151–155. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1680042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, C., D.P. Cilliers, F.P. Retief, R.C. Alberts, and A.J. Bond. 2020. “Regulators’ Perceptions of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Benefits in a Sustainable Development Context.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 81. doi:.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 1998. National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998). (Government Notice 1540). Government Gazette 19519, 2 Nov.
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2014a. Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014. (Government Notice 982). Government Gazette 38282, 4 Dec.
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2014b. National Appeals Regulations, 2014. (Government Notice 993). Government Gazette 38303, 8 Dec.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, B. 1996. International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental assessment - Final Report: Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance. Ottawa: International Association for Impact Assessment and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., A. Hoffman, and F. Retief. 2008. “Reflections on the Quality of Mining EIA Reports in South Africa.” The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 108: 701–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., A. Van Heerden, C. Jones, F. Retief, and A. Morrison-Saunders. 2013. “Does Enhanced Regulation Improve EIA Report Quality? Lessons from South Africa.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 38: 155–162. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., C. Huysaman, F. Retief, A. Morrison-Saunders, A. Bond, J. Pope, and R. Alberts. 2020. “Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment Report Quality in South African National Parks.” Koedoe 62 (1): 1–9. doi:10.4102/koedoe.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., F. Van der Vyver, and F. Retief. 2013b. “Performance of Environmental Impact Assessment in the Explosives Manufacturing Industry in South Africa.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 15 (3): 1350013–1350018. doi:10.1142/S1464333213500130.
   Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., M. Moloto, and F. Retief. 2008a. “The Quality of Environmental Impact Assessment Reports for Projects with the Potential of Affecting Wetlands.” Water SA 34 (2): 155–162. doi:10.4314/wsa.v34i2.183635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandham, L., T. Carrol, and F. Retief. 2010. “The Contribution of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to Decision-Making for Biological Pest Control in South Africa: The Case of Lantana Camara.” Biological Control 55 (2): 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sive, D. 1970. “Some Thoughts of an Environmental Lawyer in the Wilderness of Administrative Law.” Columbia Law Review 70 (4): 612–651. doi:10.2307/1121309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel, Felicity, Francois Retief, Alan Bond, Jenny Pope, Angus Morrison-Saunders, Morgan Houptfleisch, and Monica Fundingsland. 2019. “Explanations for the Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Areas with High Biodiversity Value.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 21 (2): 1950009–1950030. doi:10.1142/S1464333219500091.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar